The impact of alternate level of care on access block and operational strategies to reduce emergency wait times: a multi-center simulation study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Yuan Tian, Nathaniel D Osgood, James Stempien, Vivian Onaemo, Adrienne Danyliw, Graham Fast, Beliz Acan Osman, Janet Reynolds, Jenny Basran
{"title":"The impact of alternate level of care on access block and operational strategies to reduce emergency wait times: a multi-center simulation study.","authors":"Yuan Tian,&nbsp;Nathaniel D Osgood,&nbsp;James Stempien,&nbsp;Vivian Onaemo,&nbsp;Adrienne Danyliw,&nbsp;Graham Fast,&nbsp;Beliz Acan Osman,&nbsp;Janet Reynolds,&nbsp;Jenny Basran","doi":"10.1007/s43678-023-00514-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lengthy emergency department (ED) wait times caused by hospital access block is a growing concern for the Canadian health care system. Our objective was to quantify the impact of alternate-level-of-care on hospital access block and evaluate the likely effects of multiple interventions on ED wait times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Discrete-event simulation models were developed to simulate patient flows in EDs and acute care of six Canadian hospitals. The model was populated with administrative data from multiple sources (April 2017-March 2018). We simulated and assessed six different intervention scenarios' impact on three outcome measures: (1) time waiting for physician initial assessment, (2) time waiting for inpatient bed, and (3) patients who leave without being seen. We compared each scenario's outcome measures to the baseline scenario for each ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eliminating 30% of medical inpatients' alternate-level-of-care days reduced the mean time waiting for inpatient bed by 0.25 to 4.22 h. Increasing ED physician coverage reduced the mean time waiting for physician initial assessment (∆ 0.16-0.46 h). High-quality care transitions targeting medical patients lowered the mean time waiting for inpatient bed for all EDs (∆ 0.34-6.85 h). Reducing ED visits for family practice sensitive conditions or improving continuity of care resulted in clinically negligible reductions in wait times and patients who leave without being seen rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A moderate reduction in alternate-level-of-care hospital days for medical patients could alleviate access block and reduce ED wait times, although the magnitude of reduction varies by site. Increasing ED physician staffing and aligning physician capacity with inflow demand could also decrease wait time. Operational strategies for reducing ED wait times should prioritize resolving output and throughput factors rather than input factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":55286,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 7","pages":"608-616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-023-00514-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: Lengthy emergency department (ED) wait times caused by hospital access block is a growing concern for the Canadian health care system. Our objective was to quantify the impact of alternate-level-of-care on hospital access block and evaluate the likely effects of multiple interventions on ED wait times.

Methods: Discrete-event simulation models were developed to simulate patient flows in EDs and acute care of six Canadian hospitals. The model was populated with administrative data from multiple sources (April 2017-March 2018). We simulated and assessed six different intervention scenarios' impact on three outcome measures: (1) time waiting for physician initial assessment, (2) time waiting for inpatient bed, and (3) patients who leave without being seen. We compared each scenario's outcome measures to the baseline scenario for each ED.

Results: Eliminating 30% of medical inpatients' alternate-level-of-care days reduced the mean time waiting for inpatient bed by 0.25 to 4.22 h. Increasing ED physician coverage reduced the mean time waiting for physician initial assessment (∆ 0.16-0.46 h). High-quality care transitions targeting medical patients lowered the mean time waiting for inpatient bed for all EDs (∆ 0.34-6.85 h). Reducing ED visits for family practice sensitive conditions or improving continuity of care resulted in clinically negligible reductions in wait times and patients who leave without being seen rates.

Conclusions: A moderate reduction in alternate-level-of-care hospital days for medical patients could alleviate access block and reduce ED wait times, although the magnitude of reduction varies by site. Increasing ED physician staffing and aligning physician capacity with inflow demand could also decrease wait time. Operational strategies for reducing ED wait times should prioritize resolving output and throughput factors rather than input factors.

备用护理级别对通道阻塞和减少紧急等待时间的操作策略的影响:一项多中心模拟研究
目的:冗长的急诊科(ED)等待时间引起的医院访问阻塞是一个日益关注的加拿大卫生保健系统。我们的目标是量化交替护理级别对医院通道阻塞的影响,并评估多种干预措施对急诊科等待时间的可能影响。方法:建立离散事件模拟模型来模拟加拿大六家医院急诊科和急症护理的病人流动。该模型填充了来自多个来源的管理数据(2017年4月至2018年3月)。我们模拟并评估了六种不同干预方案对三个结果指标的影响:(1)等待医生初步评估的时间,(2)等待住院床位的时间,以及(3)未被看到的患者离开。我们将每个情景的结果测量值与每个ed的基线情景进行了比较。减少30%的医疗住院患者的备选护理级别天数,使平均等待住院床位的时间减少了0.25至4.22小时。增加急诊科医生覆盖率减少了平均等待医生初步评估的时间(∆0.16-0.46小时)。针对医疗患者的高质量护理转变降低了所有急诊科的平均等待住院床位时间(∆0.34-6.85小时)可忽略不计的减少等待时间和病人离开没有看到率。结论:适度减少医疗患者的交替护理级别住院天数可以缓解通道阻塞并减少急诊科等待时间,尽管减少的幅度因地点而异。增加急诊科医生的配备,使医生的能力与流入的需求保持一致,也可以减少等待时间。减少ED等待时间的操作策略应该优先解决输出和吞吐量因素,而不是输入因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
171
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CJEM is a peer-reviewed journal owned by CAEP. CJEM is published every 2 months (January, March, May, July, September and November). CJEM presents articles of interest to emergency care providers in rural, urban or academic settings. Publishing services are provided by the Canadian Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信