Beginning Early: Reflective Practice Development in a Pre-health Course on Health Literacy and Health Disparities.

Jody L Lounsbery, Anna Milone, Claire Fenimore, Amy L Pittenger
{"title":"Beginning Early: Reflective Practice Development in a Pre-health Course on Health Literacy and Health Disparities.","authors":"Jody L Lounsbery,&nbsp;Anna Milone,&nbsp;Claire Fenimore,&nbsp;Amy L Pittenger","doi":"10.24926/iip.v13i4.4781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Learning reflective practices and understanding the complexity of health literacy and health disparities need to start early in health professions training. The primary objective of this inquiry was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using reflection categorization for assessing learner progression on reflective practice development. The secondary objective was to evaluate student reflection as a strategy for introducing and advancing pre-professional learners' understanding of health literacy and health disparities. <b>Case Description</b>: Within an online undergraduate health literacy course, two written reflection assignments were coded using Kember's four categories: habitual action, understanding, reflection, and critical reflection. Students received feedback based on this reflection categorization to promote development of reflective practices. However, reflections were not graded using the reflection categorization. <b>Case Themes</b>: Most (78%) students were at the level of understanding for the first reflection. For the second reflection, 29% of students were at the reflection level, demonstrating health literacy application and describing the important contributing role of personal context to health outcomes. Sixteen (33%) students progressed in their level of reflection. Within the reflections, students discussed knowledge gained and plans for future application. <b>Conclusion</b>: Using a structured reflection activity allowed pre-health students to begin developing reflection practices. Through reflection, students were able to describe and apply health literacy and health disparities knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10256287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i4.4781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Learning reflective practices and understanding the complexity of health literacy and health disparities need to start early in health professions training. The primary objective of this inquiry was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of using reflection categorization for assessing learner progression on reflective practice development. The secondary objective was to evaluate student reflection as a strategy for introducing and advancing pre-professional learners' understanding of health literacy and health disparities. Case Description: Within an online undergraduate health literacy course, two written reflection assignments were coded using Kember's four categories: habitual action, understanding, reflection, and critical reflection. Students received feedback based on this reflection categorization to promote development of reflective practices. However, reflections were not graded using the reflection categorization. Case Themes: Most (78%) students were at the level of understanding for the first reflection. For the second reflection, 29% of students were at the reflection level, demonstrating health literacy application and describing the important contributing role of personal context to health outcomes. Sixteen (33%) students progressed in their level of reflection. Within the reflections, students discussed knowledge gained and plans for future application. Conclusion: Using a structured reflection activity allowed pre-health students to begin developing reflection practices. Through reflection, students were able to describe and apply health literacy and health disparities knowledge.

Abstract Image

早期开始:健康素养和健康差异的学前健康课程的反思实践发展。
背景:学习反思性实践和理解卫生素养和卫生差异的复杂性需要在卫生专业培训的早期开始。本调查的主要目的是评估使用反思分类来评估学习者在反思实践发展方面的进展的可行性和有效性。第二个目标是评价学生的反思作为一种策略,以引入和促进专业前学习者对健康素养和健康差异的理解。案例描述:在一个在线本科健康素养课程中,两个书面反思作业使用Kember的四个类别进行编码:习惯性行动、理解、反思和批判性反思。学生根据这种反思分类得到反馈,以促进反思实践的发展。但是,没有使用反射分类对反射进行分级。案例主题:大多数(78%)学生在第一次反思时达到理解水平。对于第二次反思,29%的学生处于反思水平,展示了健康素养的应用,并描述了个人背景对健康结果的重要贡献作用。16名(33%)学生的反思水平有所提高。在反思中,学生们讨论了所获得的知识和未来应用的计划。结论:使用结构化的反思活动允许学前健康学生开始发展反思实践。通过反思,学生能够描述和应用健康素养和健康差异知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信