Navigating gaps in practice: consensus recommendations for educational and support structures for emergency physicians returning from gaps in practice.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Andrew K Hall, Nicole Rocca, Raluca Alexandra Stefan, Tegan Turner, Timothy Chaplin, Teresa M Chan, Tamara McColl, Teresa Wawrykow, Jill McEwen, Shirley Lee, Heather Murray
{"title":"Navigating gaps in practice: consensus recommendations for educational and support structures for emergency physicians returning from gaps in practice.","authors":"Andrew K Hall,&nbsp;Nicole Rocca,&nbsp;Raluca Alexandra Stefan,&nbsp;Tegan Turner,&nbsp;Timothy Chaplin,&nbsp;Teresa M Chan,&nbsp;Tamara McColl,&nbsp;Teresa Wawrykow,&nbsp;Jill McEwen,&nbsp;Shirley Lee,&nbsp;Heather Murray","doi":"10.1007/s43678-023-00536-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify the learning needs of emergency physicians returning to Emergency Medicine (EM) practice after clinical leaves of less than 2 years, summarize existing return to practice programs, and propose recommendations regarding ideal educational and support structures for these physicians both during their practice gaps and upon return to EM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multiple-phased study was conducted to establish recommendations regarding ideal educational and support structures for emergency physicians returning from practice gaps of less than 2 years. The overall design involved an initial environmental scan of existing and exemplar programs and regulatory body positions, followed by interviews with EM Department Heads from across Canada, and then subsequent content analysis and recommendation derivation by EM medical education expert group consensus. These summary recommendations were further revised by consensus at the 2022 CAEP conference academic symposium to derive a final set of consensus recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have developed a set of recommendations regarding ideal educational and support structures for physicians experiencing gaps in practice of less than 2 years. This set of recommendations was informed by review of existing and exemplar programs, policies and experience of regulatory bodies, interviews with EM Department Heads across Canada, and a subsequent process of consensus at the 2022 CAEP conference academic symposium. It is hoped that this set of recommendations will inform discussions and potential strategies employed by departments to facilitate the smooth and effective return to EM practice for individuals experiencing gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":55286,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 7","pages":"568-579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-023-00536-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify the learning needs of emergency physicians returning to Emergency Medicine (EM) practice after clinical leaves of less than 2 years, summarize existing return to practice programs, and propose recommendations regarding ideal educational and support structures for these physicians both during their practice gaps and upon return to EM.

Methods: A multiple-phased study was conducted to establish recommendations regarding ideal educational and support structures for emergency physicians returning from practice gaps of less than 2 years. The overall design involved an initial environmental scan of existing and exemplar programs and regulatory body positions, followed by interviews with EM Department Heads from across Canada, and then subsequent content analysis and recommendation derivation by EM medical education expert group consensus. These summary recommendations were further revised by consensus at the 2022 CAEP conference academic symposium to derive a final set of consensus recommendations.

Conclusions: We have developed a set of recommendations regarding ideal educational and support structures for physicians experiencing gaps in practice of less than 2 years. This set of recommendations was informed by review of existing and exemplar programs, policies and experience of regulatory bodies, interviews with EM Department Heads across Canada, and a subsequent process of consensus at the 2022 CAEP conference academic symposium. It is hoped that this set of recommendations will inform discussions and potential strategies employed by departments to facilitate the smooth and effective return to EM practice for individuals experiencing gaps.

在实践中导航差距:从实践差距中返回的急诊医生的教育和支持结构的共识建议
目的:本研究的目的是确定临床休假不到2年的急诊医生重返急诊医学(EM)实践的学习需求,总结现有的重返实践计划,并提出关于这些医生在实习间隙和重返EM后的理想教育和支持结构的建议。开展了一项多阶段的研究,旨在为实习不足2年的急诊医生提供理想的教育和支持结构建议。总体设计包括对现有和示范项目以及监管机构职位进行初步环境扫描,随后与加拿大各地的EM部门负责人进行访谈,然后由EM医学教育专家组共识进行内容分析和建议推导。这些总结建议在2022年CAEP会议学术研讨会上经共识进一步修订,得出最终的共识建议。结论:我们已经制定了一套关于理想的教育和支持结构的建议,以供医生在实践中经历不到2年的差距。这组建议是通过审查现有和示范项目、政策和监管机构的经验,采访加拿大各地的EM部门负责人,以及随后在2022年CAEP会议学术研讨会上达成共识的过程得出的。希望这组建议能够为各部门的讨论和可能采用的策略提供信息,以促进经历差距的个人顺利有效地回归电子商务实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
171
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CJEM is a peer-reviewed journal owned by CAEP. CJEM is published every 2 months (January, March, May, July, September and November). CJEM presents articles of interest to emergency care providers in rural, urban or academic settings. Publishing services are provided by the Canadian Medical Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信