Surgical approach had minor association with femoral stem migration in total hip arthroplasty: radiostereometric analysis of 61 patients after 5-year follow-up.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Kristin Haugan, Olav A Foss, Otto S Husby, Vigdis S Husby, Svein Svenningsen, Siri B Winther
{"title":"Surgical approach had minor association with femoral stem migration in total hip arthroplasty: radiostereometric analysis of 61 patients after 5-year follow-up.","authors":"Kristin Haugan,&nbsp;Olav A Foss,&nbsp;Otto S Husby,&nbsp;Vigdis S Husby,&nbsp;Svein Svenningsen,&nbsp;Siri B Winther","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2023.18264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is usually performed using 1 of 3 surgical approaches: direct lateral (DLA), posterior (PA), or anterior (AA). AA is different from DLA and PA owing to limited intraoperative visibility of the femoral canal. This could affect stem positioning and therefore migration. We aimed to perform an exploratory radiostereometric analysis (RSA) study with 3 groups for surgical approach assessing stem migration up to 5 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>61 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip were included. 21 patients were allocated to the DLA, 20 to the PA, and 20 to the AA group. All patients received an uncemented, collarless, double-tapered, fully hydroxyapatite-coated Profemur Gladiator stem. Migration was measured with model-based RSA. Baseline RSA was on day 1 postoperatively. The follow-ups were at day 8, at 5 weeks, and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after surgery. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze maximum total point motion (MTPM) migrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group mean differences in MTPM were 0.4 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.5 to 2.4) for DLA vs. PA, 1.1 mm (CI -1.0 to 3.3) for AA vs. DLA, and 1.6 mm (CI -0.8 to 3.9) for AA vs. PA, when adjusted for sex and age as covariates. 2 stems in the AA group had excessive early migration. For all stems the migrations occurred mainly within 5-week follow-up and then stabilized.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At 5-year follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in stem migration associated with the 3 surgical approaches used in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"94 ","pages":"410-415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/ee/ActaO-94-18264.PMC10416221.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.18264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is usually performed using 1 of 3 surgical approaches: direct lateral (DLA), posterior (PA), or anterior (AA). AA is different from DLA and PA owing to limited intraoperative visibility of the femoral canal. This could affect stem positioning and therefore migration. We aimed to perform an exploratory radiostereometric analysis (RSA) study with 3 groups for surgical approach assessing stem migration up to 5 years postoperatively.

Patients and methods: 61 patients with unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip were included. 21 patients were allocated to the DLA, 20 to the PA, and 20 to the AA group. All patients received an uncemented, collarless, double-tapered, fully hydroxyapatite-coated Profemur Gladiator stem. Migration was measured with model-based RSA. Baseline RSA was on day 1 postoperatively. The follow-ups were at day 8, at 5 weeks, and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after surgery. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze maximum total point motion (MTPM) migrations.

Results: Group mean differences in MTPM were 0.4 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.5 to 2.4) for DLA vs. PA, 1.1 mm (CI -1.0 to 3.3) for AA vs. DLA, and 1.6 mm (CI -0.8 to 3.9) for AA vs. PA, when adjusted for sex and age as covariates. 2 stems in the AA group had excessive early migration. For all stems the migrations occurred mainly within 5-week follow-up and then stabilized.

Conclusion: At 5-year follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in stem migration associated with the 3 surgical approaches used in this study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

手术入路与全髋关节置换术中股骨干移位的相关性较小:61例患者5年随访后的放射立体分析。
背景和目的:全髋关节置换术(THA)通常采用三种手术入路中的一种:直接外侧(DLA)、后部(PA)或前方(AA)。由于术中股骨管能见度有限,AA与DLA和PA不同。这可能会影响杆的定位,从而影响杆的迁移。我们的目的是进行一项探索性放射立体分析(RSA)研究,其中三组手术入路评估术后5年的干迁移。患者和方法:纳入61例单侧髋关节骨关节炎患者。21例患者分为DLA组,20例患者分为PA组,20例患者分为AA组。所有患者均接受无骨水泥、无颈圈、双锥形、全羟基磷灰石涂层的Profemur Gladiator骨干。迁移用基于模型的RSA进行测量。基线RSA为术后第1天。随访时间分别为术后第8天、第5周、第3、6、12、24和60个月。采用广义线性混合模型对最大总点运动(MTPM)偏移进行分析。结果:当将性别和年龄作为协变量调整后,DLA与PA的MTPM组平均差异为0.4 mm(95%可信区间[CI] -1.5至2.4),AA与DLA的MTPM组平均差异为1.1 mm (CI -1.0至3.3),AA与PA的MTPM组平均差异为1.6 mm (CI -0.8至3.9)。AA组有2个茎过早迁移过多。所有病例的迁移主要发生在随访5周内,随后趋于稳定。结论:在5年随访中,本研究中使用的3种手术入路在干细胞迁移方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信