Using an Accelerated Undergraduate Needs Finding Course to Build Skills, Inspire Confidence, and Promote Interest in Health Technology Innovation.

Biomedical engineering education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-10 DOI:10.1007/s43683-023-00109-3
Lyn Denend, Susie Spielman, Ross Venook, Ravinder D Pamnani, David Camarillo, James Wall, Joseph Towles
{"title":"Using an Accelerated Undergraduate Needs Finding Course to Build Skills, Inspire Confidence, and Promote Interest in Health Technology Innovation.","authors":"Lyn Denend,&nbsp;Susie Spielman,&nbsp;Ross Venook,&nbsp;Ravinder D Pamnani,&nbsp;David Camarillo,&nbsp;James Wall,&nbsp;Joseph Towles","doi":"10.1007/s43683-023-00109-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many undergraduate educational experiences in biomedical design lack clinical immersion-based needs finding training for students. Convinced of the merits of this type of training for undergraduates, but unable to offer a quarter-long course due to faculty and administrative constraints, we developed an accelerated block-plan course, during which students were dedicated solely to our class for 3 weeks. The course focused on the earliest stages of the health technology innovation process-conducting effective clinical observations and performing comprehensive need research and screening. We grounded the course in experiential learning theory (with hands-on, collaborative, and immersive experiences) and constructivist learning theory (where students integrated prior knowledge with new material on need-driven innovation). This paper describes the design of this intensive block-plan course and the teaching methods intended to support the achievement of five learning objectives. We used pre- and post-course surveys to gather self-reported data about the effect of the course on student learning. Despite the accelerated format, we saw statistically significant gains for all but one sub-measure across the learning objectives. Our experience supports key benefits of the block-plan model, and the results indicate that specific course design choices were effective in achieving positive learning outcomes. These design decisions include (1) opportunities for students to practice observations before entering the clinical setting; (2) a framework for the curriculum that reinforced important concepts iteratively throughout the program; (3) balanced coverage of preparation, clinical immersion, and need research; (4) extensive faculty and peer coaching; and (5) providing hands-on prototyping opportunities while staying focused on need characterization rather than solution development. Based on our experience, we expect that this model is replicable across institutions with limited bandwidth to support clinical immersion opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72385,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering education","volume":"3 2","pages":"319-329"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-023-00109-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many undergraduate educational experiences in biomedical design lack clinical immersion-based needs finding training for students. Convinced of the merits of this type of training for undergraduates, but unable to offer a quarter-long course due to faculty and administrative constraints, we developed an accelerated block-plan course, during which students were dedicated solely to our class for 3 weeks. The course focused on the earliest stages of the health technology innovation process-conducting effective clinical observations and performing comprehensive need research and screening. We grounded the course in experiential learning theory (with hands-on, collaborative, and immersive experiences) and constructivist learning theory (where students integrated prior knowledge with new material on need-driven innovation). This paper describes the design of this intensive block-plan course and the teaching methods intended to support the achievement of five learning objectives. We used pre- and post-course surveys to gather self-reported data about the effect of the course on student learning. Despite the accelerated format, we saw statistically significant gains for all but one sub-measure across the learning objectives. Our experience supports key benefits of the block-plan model, and the results indicate that specific course design choices were effective in achieving positive learning outcomes. These design decisions include (1) opportunities for students to practice observations before entering the clinical setting; (2) a framework for the curriculum that reinforced important concepts iteratively throughout the program; (3) balanced coverage of preparation, clinical immersion, and need research; (4) extensive faculty and peer coaching; and (5) providing hands-on prototyping opportunities while staying focused on need characterization rather than solution development. Based on our experience, we expect that this model is replicable across institutions with limited bandwidth to support clinical immersion opportunities.

Abstract Image

使用加速本科生需求发现课程来培养技能,激发信心,并提高对卫生技术创新的兴趣。
许多生物医学设计专业的本科生教育经验缺乏基于临床沉浸式需求发现的学生培训。我们确信这种类型的培训对本科生有好处,但由于师资和行政限制,无法提供四分之一长的课程,因此我们开发了一个加速的整体计划课程,在这期间,学生们只专注于我们的课程3周。该课程侧重于卫生技术创新过程的早期阶段,进行有效的临床观察,并进行全面的需求研究和筛查。我们以体验式学习理论(实践、合作和沉浸式体验)和建构主义学习理论(学生将先前的知识与新材料结合在需求驱动的创新上)为基础。本文介绍了这门密集型分段计划课程的设计以及旨在支持实现五个学习目标的教学方法。我们使用课前和课后调查来收集关于课程对学生学习影响的自我报告数据。尽管采用了加速形式,但我们发现,在整个学习目标中,除了一个子指标外,其他所有指标都取得了统计上的显著进步。我们的经验支持了整体计划模式的主要优势,结果表明,特定的课程设计选择在实现积极的学习成果方面是有效的。这些设计决策包括:(1)学生在进入临床环境之前有机会进行观察;(2) 课程框架,在整个课程中反复强化重要概念;(3) 均衡覆盖准备、临床沉浸和需求研究;(4) 广泛的教员和同行辅导;以及(5)提供动手制作原型的机会,同时专注于需求表征而非解决方案开发。根据我们的经验,我们预计这种模式可以在带宽有限的机构中复制,以支持临床沉浸式机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信