Extremity exposure of nuclear medicine workers: results from an EANM and EURADOS survey.

Lídia Cunha, Jérémie Dabin, Sigrid Leide-Svegborn, Alessandra Zorz, Robert Kollaard, Peter Covens
{"title":"Extremity exposure of nuclear medicine workers: results from an EANM and EURADOS survey.","authors":"Lídia Cunha,&nbsp;Jérémie Dabin,&nbsp;Sigrid Leide-Svegborn,&nbsp;Alessandra Zorz,&nbsp;Robert Kollaard,&nbsp;Peter Covens","doi":"10.23736/S1824-4785.22.03504-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extremity exposure during the handling of unsealed radioactive sources is a matter of concern for nuclear medicine workers. Next to <sup>99m</sup>Tc and <sup>18</sup>F, other radiopharmaceuticals have seen an increase in their use over the last decade. However, limited information on their impact on extremity dose is available. This study aimed to gain insight into the status of extremity exposure and dose monitoring in Europe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was conducted at the end of 2020 among the European Association of Nuclear Medicine community. It contained 24 questions considering department characteristics, worker tasks, dosimeter use, typical worker extremity dose, department workload for selected radionuclides (<sup>99m</sup>Tc, <sup>18</sup>F, <sup>68</sup>Ga, <sup>177</sup>Lu, <sup>90</sup>Y) and protective measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 replies were received, 92% of which were from Europe. About half of the respondents were from academic hospitals. Ninety-nine departments implement extremity dose monitoring for a total of 1335 workers. Most workers (95%) wear a ring dosimeter, generally on the non-dominant hand, and 44% on the index finger. Monthly doses were generally low (median values at different ring position: 0.4-1.8 mSv), although higher doses were reported (20.8-38.8 mSv). About 1/3 of workers performed the full task range (preparation, dispensing, and administration). Administration is associated with significantly lower extremity doses. Interestingly, no correlation between department workload and collective dose was found. The adoption of vial and syringe shielding, as well as distance tools, was common. The workers dispensing <sup>99m</sup>Tc without syringe shielding or PET nuclides without automated system received a significantly higher dose. Handling <sup>68</sup>Ga, <sup>177</sup>Lu and <sup>90</sup>Y did not appear to have an impact on the reported doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Protective measures play a significant role in lowering extremity doses, while department workload and more recently introduced radionuclides seem not to be major dose determinants.</p>","PeriodicalId":23069,"journal":{"name":"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...","volume":"67 1","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1824-4785.22.03504-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Extremity exposure during the handling of unsealed radioactive sources is a matter of concern for nuclear medicine workers. Next to 99mTc and 18F, other radiopharmaceuticals have seen an increase in their use over the last decade. However, limited information on their impact on extremity dose is available. This study aimed to gain insight into the status of extremity exposure and dose monitoring in Europe.

Methods: A survey was conducted at the end of 2020 among the European Association of Nuclear Medicine community. It contained 24 questions considering department characteristics, worker tasks, dosimeter use, typical worker extremity dose, department workload for selected radionuclides (99mTc, 18F, 68Ga, 177Lu, 90Y) and protective measures.

Results: A total of 106 replies were received, 92% of which were from Europe. About half of the respondents were from academic hospitals. Ninety-nine departments implement extremity dose monitoring for a total of 1335 workers. Most workers (95%) wear a ring dosimeter, generally on the non-dominant hand, and 44% on the index finger. Monthly doses were generally low (median values at different ring position: 0.4-1.8 mSv), although higher doses were reported (20.8-38.8 mSv). About 1/3 of workers performed the full task range (preparation, dispensing, and administration). Administration is associated with significantly lower extremity doses. Interestingly, no correlation between department workload and collective dose was found. The adoption of vial and syringe shielding, as well as distance tools, was common. The workers dispensing 99mTc without syringe shielding or PET nuclides without automated system received a significantly higher dose. Handling 68Ga, 177Lu and 90Y did not appear to have an impact on the reported doses.

Conclusions: Protective measures play a significant role in lowering extremity doses, while department workload and more recently introduced radionuclides seem not to be major dose determinants.

核医学工作者的肢体暴露:EANM和EURADOS调查的结果。
背景:处理非密封放射源时的肢体暴露是核医学工作者关注的问题。除了99mTc和18F之外,其他放射性药物的使用在过去十年中也有所增加。然而,关于它们对极端剂量的影响的资料有限。本研究旨在深入了解欧洲的肢体暴露和剂量监测状况。方法:于2020年底对欧洲核医学协会进行调查。它包含24个问题,考虑部门特点、工人任务、剂量计使用、典型工人极限剂量、选定放射性核素(99mTc、18F、68Ga、177Lu、90Y)的部门工作量和防护措施。结果:共收到106份回复,其中92%来自欧洲。大约一半的受访者来自学术医院。99个部门对1335名工作人员实施极限剂量监测。大多数工人(95%)佩戴环形剂量计,通常在非惯用手,44%在食指。月剂量一般较低(不同环位的中位数为0.4-1.8毫西弗),尽管有较高剂量的报告(20.8-38.8毫西弗)。大约1/3的工人完成了全部任务范围(准备、配药和给药)。给药与下肢剂量显著相关。有趣的是,科室工作量与集体剂量之间没有相关性。采用小瓶和注射器屏蔽,以及距离工具,是普遍的。在没有注射器屏蔽或没有自动系统的情况下分配99mTc或PET核素的工人接受的剂量明显更高。处理68Ga、177Lu和90Y似乎对报告的剂量没有影响。结论:防护措施在降低肢体剂量方面发挥了重要作用,而科室工作量和最近引入的放射性核素似乎不是主要的剂量决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信