Reasonable access: important characteristics and perceived quality of legal and illegal sources of cannabis for medical purposes in Canada.

N Rielle Capler, Lynda G Balneaves, Jane A Buxton, Thomas Kerr
{"title":"Reasonable access: important characteristics and perceived quality of legal and illegal sources of cannabis for medical purposes in Canada.","authors":"N Rielle Capler,&nbsp;Lynda G Balneaves,&nbsp;Jane A Buxton,&nbsp;Thomas Kerr","doi":"10.1186/s42238-023-00185-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Throughout the past two decades of legal medical cannabis in Canada, individuals have experienced challenges related to accessing legal sources of cannabis for medical purposes. The objective of our study was to examine the sources of cannabis accessed by individuals authorized to use medical cannabis and to identify possible reasons for their use of illegal sources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals who participated in the Cannabis Access Regulations Study (CANARY), a national cross-sectional survey launched in 2014, and indicated they were currently authorized to use cannabis for medical purposes in Canada were included in this study. We assessed differences between participants accessing cannabis from only legal sources versus from illegal sources in relation to sociodemographic characteristics, health-related factors, and characteristics of medical cannabis they considered important. A secondary analysis assessed differences in satisfaction with various dimensions of cannabis products and services provided by legal versus illegal sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half of the 237 study participants accessed cannabis from illegal sources. Individuals accessing cannabis from illegal sources were significantly more likely to value pesticide-free products, access to a variety of strains, ability to select strain and dosage, ability to observe and smell cannabis, availability in a dispensary, and availability in small quantities than did individuals accessing cannabis from only legal sources (all p < 0.05). Additionally, participants gave significantly higher satisfaction scores to illegal sources than to legal sources on service-related dimensions of cannabis access (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings contribute to an understanding of reasonable access to medical cannabis from a patient perspective and how to assess whether it has been achieved. Characteristics of cannabis products and services valued by patients and appropriate to their needs should be incorporated into legal medical cannabis programs to promote the use of legal medical sources. While pertaining specifically to medical use of cannabis in Canada, the findings of this study may also be instructive for understanding the use of illegal cannabis sources for non-medical purposes in Canada and provide insight for other jurisdictions implementing cannabis regulations for both medical and non-medical purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cannabis Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10251568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cannabis Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-023-00185-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Throughout the past two decades of legal medical cannabis in Canada, individuals have experienced challenges related to accessing legal sources of cannabis for medical purposes. The objective of our study was to examine the sources of cannabis accessed by individuals authorized to use medical cannabis and to identify possible reasons for their use of illegal sources.

Methods: Individuals who participated in the Cannabis Access Regulations Study (CANARY), a national cross-sectional survey launched in 2014, and indicated they were currently authorized to use cannabis for medical purposes in Canada were included in this study. We assessed differences between participants accessing cannabis from only legal sources versus from illegal sources in relation to sociodemographic characteristics, health-related factors, and characteristics of medical cannabis they considered important. A secondary analysis assessed differences in satisfaction with various dimensions of cannabis products and services provided by legal versus illegal sources.

Results: Half of the 237 study participants accessed cannabis from illegal sources. Individuals accessing cannabis from illegal sources were significantly more likely to value pesticide-free products, access to a variety of strains, ability to select strain and dosage, ability to observe and smell cannabis, availability in a dispensary, and availability in small quantities than did individuals accessing cannabis from only legal sources (all p < 0.05). Additionally, participants gave significantly higher satisfaction scores to illegal sources than to legal sources on service-related dimensions of cannabis access (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Our findings contribute to an understanding of reasonable access to medical cannabis from a patient perspective and how to assess whether it has been achieved. Characteristics of cannabis products and services valued by patients and appropriate to their needs should be incorporated into legal medical cannabis programs to promote the use of legal medical sources. While pertaining specifically to medical use of cannabis in Canada, the findings of this study may also be instructive for understanding the use of illegal cannabis sources for non-medical purposes in Canada and provide insight for other jurisdictions implementing cannabis regulations for both medical and non-medical purposes.

Abstract Image

合理获取:加拿大医用大麻合法和非法来源的重要特征和质量。
背景:在加拿大合法医用大麻的过去二十年中,个人在获取用于医疗目的的合法大麻来源方面遇到了挑战。我们研究的目的是审查被授权使用医用大麻的个人获得的大麻来源,并确定他们使用非法来源的可能原因。方法:参与2014年启动的全国性横断面调查“大麻获取条例研究”(CANARY)的个人,并表示他们目前被授权在加拿大用于医疗目的使用大麻,纳入本研究。我们评估了仅从合法来源获取大麻与从非法来源获取大麻之间的差异,包括社会人口学特征、健康相关因素以及他们认为重要的医用大麻特征。第二项分析评估了对合法来源与非法来源提供的大麻产品和服务的各个方面的满意度差异。结果:237名研究参与者中有一半从非法来源获得大麻。与仅从合法来源获取大麻的个人相比,从非法来源获取大麻的个人更有可能重视无农药产品、获得各种品种、选择品种和剂量的能力、观察和闻到大麻的能力、在药房的可获得性以及少量的可获得性(均p < 0.05)。此外,参与者在大麻获取服务相关维度上对非法来源的满意度得分明显高于合法来源(均p < 0.05)。结论:我们的研究结果有助于从患者的角度理解合理获得医用大麻以及如何评估是否已经实现。应将患者重视并适合其需要的大麻产品和服务的特点纳入合法医用大麻方案,以促进合法医疗来源的使用。虽然这项研究的结果专门与加拿大大麻的医疗用途有关,但它也可能有助于了解加拿大为非医疗目的使用非法大麻来源的情况,并为为医疗和非医疗目的实施大麻条例的其他司法管辖区提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信