Dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a longitudinal, mixed-methods evaluation of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care's knowledge translation efforts.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20220121
Christine Fahim, Anupa Jyoti Prashad, Kyle Silveira, Arthana Chandraraj, Brett D Thombs, Marcello Tonelli, Guylène Thériault, Roland Grad, John Riva, Heather Colquhoun, Rachel Rodin, Melissa Subnath, Elizabeth Rolland-Harris, Kim Barnhardt, Sharon E Straus
{"title":"Dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a longitudinal, mixed-methods evaluation of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care's knowledge translation efforts.","authors":"Christine Fahim,&nbsp;Anupa Jyoti Prashad,&nbsp;Kyle Silveira,&nbsp;Arthana Chandraraj,&nbsp;Brett D Thombs,&nbsp;Marcello Tonelli,&nbsp;Guylène Thériault,&nbsp;Roland Grad,&nbsp;John Riva,&nbsp;Heather Colquhoun,&nbsp;Rachel Rodin,&nbsp;Melissa Subnath,&nbsp;Elizabeth Rolland-Harris,&nbsp;Kim Barnhardt,&nbsp;Sharon E Straus","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (task force) develops evidence-based preventive health care guidelines and knowledge translation (KT) tools to facilitate guideline dissemination and implementation. We aimed to determine practitioners' awareness of task force guidelines and KT tools and explore barriers and facilitators to their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The task force's KT team completed annual evaluations using surveys and interviews with primary care providers in Canada from 2014 to 2020, to assess practitioners' awareness and determinants of use of task force guidelines and tools. We transcribed interviews verbatim and double-coded them using a framework analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1284 primary care practitioners completed surveys and 183 participated in interviews. On average, 79.9% of participants were aware of the task force's 7 cancer screening guidelines, 36.2% were aware of the other 6 screening guidelines and 18.6% were aware of the 3 lifestyle or prevention guidelines. Participants identified 13 barriers and 7 facilitators to guideline and KT tool implementation; these were consistent over time. Participants identified strategies at the public and patient, provider and health systems levels to improve uptake of guidelines.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Canadian primary care practitioners were more aware of task force cancer screening guidelines than its other preventive health guidelines. Over the 6-year period, participants consistently reported barriers to guideline uptake, including misalignment with patient preferences and other provincial or specialty guideline organizations. Further evaluations will assess tailored strategies to address the barriers identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 4","pages":"E684-E695"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/45/ab/cmajo.20220121.PMC10414974.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (task force) develops evidence-based preventive health care guidelines and knowledge translation (KT) tools to facilitate guideline dissemination and implementation. We aimed to determine practitioners' awareness of task force guidelines and KT tools and explore barriers and facilitators to their use.

Methods: The task force's KT team completed annual evaluations using surveys and interviews with primary care providers in Canada from 2014 to 2020, to assess practitioners' awareness and determinants of use of task force guidelines and tools. We transcribed interviews verbatim and double-coded them using a framework analysis approach.

Results: A total of 1284 primary care practitioners completed surveys and 183 participated in interviews. On average, 79.9% of participants were aware of the task force's 7 cancer screening guidelines, 36.2% were aware of the other 6 screening guidelines and 18.6% were aware of the 3 lifestyle or prevention guidelines. Participants identified 13 barriers and 7 facilitators to guideline and KT tool implementation; these were consistent over time. Participants identified strategies at the public and patient, provider and health systems levels to improve uptake of guidelines.

Interpretation: Canadian primary care practitioners were more aware of task force cancer screening guidelines than its other preventive health guidelines. Over the 6-year period, participants consistently reported barriers to guideline uptake, including misalignment with patient preferences and other provincial or specialty guideline organizations. Further evaluations will assess tailored strategies to address the barriers identified.

临床实践指南的传播和实施:对加拿大预防保健工作队知识转化工作的纵向、混合方法评价。
背景:加拿大预防保健工作队(工作队)制定循证预防保健指南和知识翻译(KT)工具,以促进指南的传播和实施。我们的目标是确定从业者对工作组指南和KT工具的认识,并探索其使用的障碍和促进因素。方法:从2014年到2020年,工作队的KT小组通过对加拿大初级保健提供者的调查和访谈完成了年度评估,以评估从业人员对工作队指南和工具使用的认识和决定因素。我们逐字记录采访内容,并使用框架分析方法对其进行双重编码。结果:共有1284名基层医护人员完成问卷调查,183人参与访谈。平均而言,79.9%的参与者了解工作组的7项癌症筛查指南,36.2%了解其他6项筛查指南,18.6%了解3项生活方式或预防指南。与会者确定了实施指南和KT工具的13个障碍和7个促进因素;随着时间的推移,这些都是一致的。与会者确定了在公众和患者、提供者和卫生系统层面的战略,以改善对指南的吸收。解释:加拿大初级保健从业人员比其他预防性健康指南更了解工作组癌症筛查指南。在6年的时间里,参与者一致报告了指南采纳的障碍,包括与患者偏好和其他省级或专业指南组织的不一致。进一步的评估将评估针对所确定障碍的量身定制战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信