Neonatal Intestinal Segmental Volvulus: What Are the Differences with Midgut Volvulus?

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-11 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1772173
Maria Casalino, Maria Enrica Miscia, Giuseppe Lauriti, Estelle Gauda, Augusto Zani, Elke Zani-Ruttenstock
{"title":"Neonatal Intestinal Segmental Volvulus: What Are the Differences with Midgut Volvulus?","authors":"Maria Casalino, Maria Enrica Miscia, Giuseppe Lauriti, Estelle Gauda, Augusto Zani, Elke Zani-Ruttenstock","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1772173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Intestinal volvulus in the neonate is a surgical emergency caused by either midgut volvulus (MV) with intestinal malrotation or less commonly, by segmental volvulus (SV) without intestinal malrotation. The aim of our study was to investigate if MV and SV can be differentiated by clinical course, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Using a defined search strategy, two investigators independently identified all studies comparing MV and SV in neonates. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 1,026 abstracts screened, 104 full-text articles were analyzed, and 3 comparative studies were selected (112 patients). There were no differences in gestational age (37 vs. 36 weeks), birth weight (2,989 vs. 2,712 g), and age at presentation (6.9 vs. 3.8 days). SV was more commonly associated with abnormal findings on fetal ultrasound (US; 65 vs. 11.6%; <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Preoperatively, SV was more commonly associated with abdominal distension (32 vs. 77%; <i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas MV with a whirlpool sign on ultrasound (57 vs. 3%; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Bilious vomiting had similar incidence in both (88 ± 4% vs. 50 ± 5%). Intraoperatively, SV had a higher incidence of intestinal atresia (2 vs. 19%; <i>p</i> < 0.05) and need for bowel resection (13 vs. 91%; <i>p</i> < 0.00001). There were no differences in postoperative complications (13% MV vs. 14% SV), short bowel syndrome (15% MV vs. 0% SV; data available only from one study), and mortality (12% MV vs. 2% SV).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our study highlights the paucity of studies on SV in neonates. Nonetheless, our meta-analysis clearly indicates that SV is an entity on its own with distinct clinical features and intraoperative findings that are different from MV. SV should be considered as one of the differential diagnoses in all term and preterm babies with bilious vomiting after MV was ruled out-especially if abnormal fetal US and abdominal distension is present.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  Intestinal volvulus in the neonate is a surgical emergency caused by either midgut volvulus (MV) with intestinal malrotation or less commonly, by segmental volvulus (SV) without intestinal malrotation. The aim of our study was to investigate if MV and SV can be differentiated by clinical course, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes.

Methods:  Using a defined search strategy, two investigators independently identified all studies comparing MV and SV in neonates. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

Results:  Of 1,026 abstracts screened, 104 full-text articles were analyzed, and 3 comparative studies were selected (112 patients). There were no differences in gestational age (37 vs. 36 weeks), birth weight (2,989 vs. 2,712 g), and age at presentation (6.9 vs. 3.8 days). SV was more commonly associated with abnormal findings on fetal ultrasound (US; 65 vs. 11.6%; p < 0.00001). Preoperatively, SV was more commonly associated with abdominal distension (32 vs. 77%; p < 0.05), whereas MV with a whirlpool sign on ultrasound (57 vs. 3%; p < 0.01). Bilious vomiting had similar incidence in both (88 ± 4% vs. 50 ± 5%). Intraoperatively, SV had a higher incidence of intestinal atresia (2 vs. 19%; p < 0.05) and need for bowel resection (13 vs. 91%; p < 0.00001). There were no differences in postoperative complications (13% MV vs. 14% SV), short bowel syndrome (15% MV vs. 0% SV; data available only from one study), and mortality (12% MV vs. 2% SV).

Conclusion:  Our study highlights the paucity of studies on SV in neonates. Nonetheless, our meta-analysis clearly indicates that SV is an entity on its own with distinct clinical features and intraoperative findings that are different from MV. SV should be considered as one of the differential diagnoses in all term and preterm babies with bilious vomiting after MV was ruled out-especially if abnormal fetal US and abdominal distension is present.

新生儿肠段外翻:与中肠溃疡的区别是什么?
目的:新生儿肠套叠是一种外科急症,其原因可能是中肠套叠(MV)伴有肠旋转不良,也可能是不伴有肠旋转不良的节段性肠套叠(SV)。我们的研究旨在探讨是否可以通过临床过程、术中发现和术后结果来区分中段肠套叠和节段性肠套叠:方法:两位研究者采用明确的检索策略,独立鉴定了所有比较新生儿 MV 和 SV 的研究。结果:在筛选出的 1,026 篇摘要中,有 1,000 多篇是关于新生儿 MV 和 SV 的:在筛选出的 1026 篇摘要中,对 104 篇全文进行了分析,选出了 3 项对比研究(112 名患者)。胎龄(37 周与 36 周)、出生体重(2989 克与 2712 克)和发病年龄(6.9 天与 3.8 天)均无差异。SV 更常见于胎儿超声检查(US;65% 对 11.6%;P P P P P 结论:我们的研究凸显了有关新生儿 SV 的研究很少。然而,我们的荟萃分析清楚地表明,SV 是一个独立的实体,具有不同于 MV 的临床特征和术中发现。在排除 MV 后,所有出现胆汁性呕吐的足月儿和早产儿都应将 SV 作为鉴别诊断之一,尤其是在胎儿超声检查异常和腹胀的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This broad-based international journal updates you on vital developments in pediatric surgery through original articles, abstracts of the literature, and meeting announcements. You will find state-of-the-art information on: abdominal and thoracic surgery neurosurgery urology gynecology oncology orthopaedics traumatology anesthesiology child pathology embryology morphology Written by surgeons, physicians, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and others involved in the surgical care of neonates, infants, and children, the EJPS is an indispensable resource for all specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信