Апробация методики «Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – Third Edition»

Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.21702/RPJ.2020.4.4
Полина А. Павлова, Надежда Игоревна Бакушкина, Екатерина Валерьевна Сулейманова, Надежда Валентиновна Павлова, М. А. Лаврова, Инна Викторовна Туктарева, Дмитрий А. Чегодаев, Ольга Александровна Львова, Д. М. Максимов
{"title":"Апробация методики «Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development – Third Edition»","authors":"Полина А. Павлова, Надежда Игоревна Бакушкина, Екатерина Валерьевна Сулейманова, Надежда Валентиновна Павлова, М. А. Лаврова, Инна Викторовна Туктарева, Дмитрий А. Чегодаев, Ольга Александровна Львова, Д. М. Максимов","doi":"10.21702/RPJ.2020.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. There is currently no universal comprehensive measurement tool for the assessment of children development in the Russian Federation (RF). The Bayley-III scales developed by American researchers are widely used as such a tool. Numerous research groups recognize the need to modify the original scales before using them in a new linguistic and socio-cultural environment. \nMethods. The authors (a) translated the original Bayley-III manual into Russian, (b) tested the tool by assessing cognitive, language, and motor development of 163 Russian children aged 2–11 months, and (c) made an indirect comparison of the mean scale scores of neuropsychological development and those obtained from the original American sample of children using Student’s t-test. \nResults. The modified version of the Bayley-III manual has been successfully tested in the RF. The indices of language and motor development of the children examined in this study did not statistically differ from the original American data (10 points). Higher scores were obtained for the cognitive scale (10.7 versus 10; p = 0.003). However, this effect was not very pronounced (Cohen’s d = 0.25). \nDiscussion. The indices of neuropsychological development of Russian children fully comply with the original Bayley-III norms, which opens up new possibilities for its use in the RF. Slightly higher scores of the cognitive scale among Russian children do not generally affect the compliance with the original tool, since the difference was not significant. The results of this study can be extrapolated to full-term Caucasian children aged 2–11 months, whose parents have at least secondary education and average level of earnings. The widespread use of Bayley-III requires its further adaptation in larger and more representative samples of children from different regions of the RF with the additional assessment of social-emotional development as well as adaptive behavior.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"198","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21702/RPJ.2020.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 198

Abstract

Introduction. There is currently no universal comprehensive measurement tool for the assessment of children development in the Russian Federation (RF). The Bayley-III scales developed by American researchers are widely used as such a tool. Numerous research groups recognize the need to modify the original scales before using them in a new linguistic and socio-cultural environment. Methods. The authors (a) translated the original Bayley-III manual into Russian, (b) tested the tool by assessing cognitive, language, and motor development of 163 Russian children aged 2–11 months, and (c) made an indirect comparison of the mean scale scores of neuropsychological development and those obtained from the original American sample of children using Student’s t-test. Results. The modified version of the Bayley-III manual has been successfully tested in the RF. The indices of language and motor development of the children examined in this study did not statistically differ from the original American data (10 points). Higher scores were obtained for the cognitive scale (10.7 versus 10; p = 0.003). However, this effect was not very pronounced (Cohen’s d = 0.25). Discussion. The indices of neuropsychological development of Russian children fully comply with the original Bayley-III norms, which opens up new possibilities for its use in the RF. Slightly higher scores of the cognitive scale among Russian children do not generally affect the compliance with the original tool, since the difference was not significant. The results of this study can be extrapolated to full-term Caucasian children aged 2–11 months, whose parents have at least secondary education and average level of earnings. The widespread use of Bayley-III requires its further adaptation in larger and more representative samples of children from different regions of the RF with the additional assessment of social-emotional development as well as adaptive behavior.
分享
查看原文
Апробация методики«贝利婴幼儿发展量表-第三版»
介绍。目前还没有普遍的综合衡量工具来评估俄罗斯联邦的儿童发展情况。美国研究人员开发的Bayley-III量表被广泛用作此类工具。许多研究小组认识到在新的语言和社会文化环境中使用它们之前需要修改原始量表。方法。作者(a)将原始的Bayley-III手册翻译成俄语,(b)通过评估163名2-11个月的俄罗斯儿童的认知、语言和运动发展来测试该工具,(c)使用学生t检验间接比较神经心理发展的平均量表分数和从原始的美国儿童样本中获得的分数。结果。贝利- iii手册的修改版本已经成功地在RF测试。本研究中儿童的语言和运动发展指标与美国原始数据(10分)无统计学差异。认知量表得分更高(10.7比10;p = 0.003)。然而,这种影响不是很明显(Cohen’s d = 0.25)。讨论。俄罗斯儿童的神经心理发展指标完全符合原Bayley-III规范,这为其在RF中的应用开辟了新的可能性。认知量表得分稍高的俄罗斯儿童一般不影响对原始工具的依从性,因为差异不显著。这项研究的结果可以外推到2-11个月的白种人足月儿童,其父母至少受过中等教育,平均收入水平。Bayley-III的广泛使用需要进一步适应来自RF不同地区的更大、更有代表性的儿童样本,并对社会情感发展和适应行为进行额外的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信