Risk Factors for the Incidence of the Volar Lunate Facet Fragments in Distal Radius Fractures.

Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1760125
Sadaki Mitsuzawa, Hisataka Takeuchi, Yoshihiro Tsukamoto, Shinnosuke Yamashita, Satoshi Ota, Eijiro Onishi, Tadashi Yasuda
{"title":"Risk Factors for the Incidence of the Volar Lunate Facet Fragments in Distal Radius Fractures.","authors":"Sadaki Mitsuzawa,&nbsp;Hisataka Takeuchi,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Tsukamoto,&nbsp;Shinnosuke Yamashita,&nbsp;Satoshi Ota,&nbsp;Eijiro Onishi,&nbsp;Tadashi Yasuda","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1760125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  The volar lip of the distal radius is the key structure for wrist joint stability. Rigid fixation of the volar lunate facet (VLF) fragment is difficult because of its unique anatomy, and a high rate of postoperative displacement was demonstrated. <b>Purposes</b>  The aim of the study is to identify risk factors for VLF in distal radius fractures (DRFs) and to reconsider the important point for primary fixation. <b>Patients and Methods</b>  One hundred fifty-five patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for an DRF were included and classified into one of the following two groups: VLF(+)or VLF(-). Demographic data, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), laterality, trauma mechanism, and AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification were recorded. Several parameters were investigated using wrist radiographs of the uninjured side and computed tomography scans of the injured side. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for VLF. <b>Results</b>  There were 25 patients in the VLF(+) group and 130 patients in the VLF(-) group. The incidence of VLF was 16.1%. The VLF(+) group tended to have a higher BMI and higher energy trauma mechanism. The odds ratio for the sigmoid notch angle (SNA), volar tilt (VT), and lunate facet curvature radius (LFCR) were 0.84, 1.32, and 0.70, respectively, with multivariate analysis, which was significant. A smaller SNA, larger VT, and smaller LFCR are potential risk factors for VLF. <b>Conclusion</b>  Over-reduction of the VT at primary fixation should be avoided because it could place an excess burden on the VLF and cause subsequent postoperative fixation failure and volar carpal subluxation. <b>Level of Evidence</b>  IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/e1/10-1055-s-0042-1760125.PMC10411066.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1760125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  The volar lip of the distal radius is the key structure for wrist joint stability. Rigid fixation of the volar lunate facet (VLF) fragment is difficult because of its unique anatomy, and a high rate of postoperative displacement was demonstrated. Purposes  The aim of the study is to identify risk factors for VLF in distal radius fractures (DRFs) and to reconsider the important point for primary fixation. Patients and Methods  One hundred fifty-five patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for an DRF were included and classified into one of the following two groups: VLF(+)or VLF(-). Demographic data, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), laterality, trauma mechanism, and AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification were recorded. Several parameters were investigated using wrist radiographs of the uninjured side and computed tomography scans of the injured side. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for VLF. Results  There were 25 patients in the VLF(+) group and 130 patients in the VLF(-) group. The incidence of VLF was 16.1%. The VLF(+) group tended to have a higher BMI and higher energy trauma mechanism. The odds ratio for the sigmoid notch angle (SNA), volar tilt (VT), and lunate facet curvature radius (LFCR) were 0.84, 1.32, and 0.70, respectively, with multivariate analysis, which was significant. A smaller SNA, larger VT, and smaller LFCR are potential risk factors for VLF. Conclusion  Over-reduction of the VT at primary fixation should be avoided because it could place an excess burden on the VLF and cause subsequent postoperative fixation failure and volar carpal subluxation. Level of Evidence  IV.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
桡骨远端骨折掌侧月骨小面碎片发生的危险因素。
背景桡骨远端掌侧唇是腕关节稳定的关键结构。由于其独特的解剖结构,掌侧月骨突(VLF)碎片的刚性固定是困难的,并且术后移位率很高。目的研究桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)中发生VLF的危险因素,并重新考虑初次固定的关键点。155例接受切开复位内固定治疗DRF的患者被分为以下两组:VLF(+)或VLF(-)。统计数据包括年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、侧卧、创伤机制、AO基金会/骨科创伤协会(AO/OTA)分类。使用未受伤侧的手腕x线片和受伤侧的计算机断层扫描研究了几个参数。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析评价VLF的危险因素。结果VLF +组25例,VLF -组130例。VLF的发生率为16.1%。VLF(+)组往往具有更高的BMI和更高的能量创伤机制。经多因素分析,乙状窦切迹角(SNA)、掌侧倾角(VT)和月骨突面曲率半径(LFCR)的比值比分别为0.84、1.32和0.70,差异均有统计学意义。较小的SNA、较大的VT和较小的LFCR是VLF的潜在危险因素。结论初次固定时应避免过份复位VT,否则会对VLF造成过重的负担,导致术后固定失败和掌侧腕半脱位。证据级别IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信