Practice day may be unnecessary prior to testing knee extensor strength in young healthy adults.

Q2 Medicine
Jamie E Hibbert, Anthony S Kulas, Patrick M Rider, Zachary J Domire
{"title":"Practice day may be unnecessary prior to testing knee extensor strength in young healthy adults.","authors":"Jamie E Hibbert,&nbsp;Anthony S Kulas,&nbsp;Patrick M Rider,&nbsp;Zachary J Domire","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2020.1766997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A practice session is common prior to strength testing. However, the benefits of practice have not been previously reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a practice session on peak torque, mean torque and between trial variability across three test days. We hypothesized that peak and mean torque would be higher and less variable the second and third test days than the first. Twenty-five healthy, young participants completed 3 maximal voluntary isometric and isokinetic knee extensions on three separate days. No difference in isometric torque was found between days 1 and 2, but there was a significant decrease in isokinetic torque (8.45 Nm). There was a significant decrease in both mean isometric and isokinetic torque from day 1 to day 3 (12.67 and 13.59 Nm). Contrary to our hypothesis, no benefit from a practice session was found. Healthy, young adults are able to produce peak knee extensor torques on the first day of testing and do not demonstrate any benefit from additional testing. Thus, a practice day preceding isometric and isokinetic knee extensor strength testing may not be necessary when testing healthy, young participants, and may, in fact, negatively impact subsequent strength measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":"7 1","pages":"58-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2020.1766997","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2020.1766997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A practice session is common prior to strength testing. However, the benefits of practice have not been previously reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a practice session on peak torque, mean torque and between trial variability across three test days. We hypothesized that peak and mean torque would be higher and less variable the second and third test days than the first. Twenty-five healthy, young participants completed 3 maximal voluntary isometric and isokinetic knee extensions on three separate days. No difference in isometric torque was found between days 1 and 2, but there was a significant decrease in isokinetic torque (8.45 Nm). There was a significant decrease in both mean isometric and isokinetic torque from day 1 to day 3 (12.67 and 13.59 Nm). Contrary to our hypothesis, no benefit from a practice session was found. Healthy, young adults are able to produce peak knee extensor torques on the first day of testing and do not demonstrate any benefit from additional testing. Thus, a practice day preceding isometric and isokinetic knee extensor strength testing may not be necessary when testing healthy, young participants, and may, in fact, negatively impact subsequent strength measurements.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在测试年轻健康成人的膝关节伸肌力量之前,练习日可能是不必要的。
通常在强度测试之前进行练习。然而,以前并没有报道过练习的好处。本研究的目的是确定练习时段对峰值扭矩、平均扭矩和三个测试天之间的试验变异性的影响。我们假设,峰值和平均扭矩将更高和更少的变化,第二个和第三个测试天比第一个。25名健康的年轻参与者在三天内完成了3次最大自主等长和等速膝关节伸展。在第1天和第2天之间,等距扭矩没有差异,但等距扭矩(8.45 Nm)显著降低。从第1天到第3天,平均等距和等速扭矩均显著下降(12.67和13.59 Nm)。与我们的假设相反,没有发现练习有任何好处。健康的年轻人能够在测试的第一天产生最大的膝关节伸肌扭矩,并且不会从额外的测试中获得任何好处。因此,在测试健康的年轻参与者时,在进行等长和等速膝关节伸肌力量测试之前进行一天的练习可能是不必要的,而且实际上可能会对随后的力量测试产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Biomechanics
International Biomechanics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Biomechanics is a fully Open Access biomechanics journal that aims to foster innovation, debate and collaboration across the full spectrum of biomechanics. We publish original articles, reviews, and short communications in all areas of biomechanics and welcome papers that explore: Bio-fluid mechanics, Continuum Biomechanics, Biotribology, Cellular Biomechanics, Mechanobiology, Mechano-transduction, Tissue Mechanics, Comparative Biomechanics and Functional Anatomy, Allometry, Animal locomotion in biomechanics, Gait analysis in biomechanics, Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Cardiovascular Biomechanics, Plant Biomechanics, Injury Biomechanics, Impact Biomechanics, Sport and Exercise Biomechanics, Kinesiology, Rehabilitation in biomechanics, Quantitative Ergonomics, Human Factors engineering, Occupational Biomechanics, Developmental Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信