Effect of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator on Venous Blood Carbon Dioxide Levels and Hemodynamic Changes in Health Care Workers.

IF 0.8 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sana Yasmin Hussain, Samiksha Khanuja, Pratibha Panjiar, Dhruv Jain, Kharat Mohammad Batt
{"title":"Effect of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator on Venous Blood Carbon Dioxide Levels and Hemodynamic Changes in Health Care Workers.","authors":"Sana Yasmin Hussain,&nbsp;Samiksha Khanuja,&nbsp;Pratibha Panjiar,&nbsp;Dhruv Jain,&nbsp;Kharat Mohammad Batt","doi":"10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_170_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) are used by health care workers for prevention of airborne infection, and its use has increased manifolds during COVID-19 pandemic. Prolonged use may result in carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) accumulation, affect hemodynamics, and blood gas values. Although arterial blood gas values accurately measure the blood CO<sub>2</sub> levels, venous blood gas values also show acceptable correlation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the physiological impact of N95 FFRs on health care workers, including hemodynamic changes and venous blood levels of CO<sub>2</sub> during a period of 6 h.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 30 health care workers who performed routine duties while wearing N95 FFR. Venous blood gas values (CO<sub>2</sub>, pH, and bicarbonate) and vitals (respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, and saturation) were noted at baseline, 2 (T2), and 6 h (T6) after wearing the mask. Discomfort level was also measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 1-10.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Repeated measures analysis was done using repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman's test. Group comparisons for continuously distributed data were made using independent sample \"<i>t</i>\" test or Wilcoxon test.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>Hemodynamic and blood gas values did not change over time. The VAS for discomfort because of respirator use was 1.33 (1.42) at T2 and 2.77 (1.91) at T6. This was a significant increase in discomfort over time (<i>P</i> = 0.001). About 80% of participants experienced discomfort during this period. N95 FFR did not lead to significant alteration in hemodynamics or change in blood gas values after 6 h of continuous usage. However, discomfort significantly increased over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":43585,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"38-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_170_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) are used by health care workers for prevention of airborne infection, and its use has increased manifolds during COVID-19 pandemic. Prolonged use may result in carbon dioxide (CO2) accumulation, affect hemodynamics, and blood gas values. Although arterial blood gas values accurately measure the blood CO2 levels, venous blood gas values also show acceptable correlation.

Aim: To evaluate the physiological impact of N95 FFRs on health care workers, including hemodynamic changes and venous blood levels of CO2 during a period of 6 h.

Settings and design: Prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital.

Methods: The study was conducted on 30 health care workers who performed routine duties while wearing N95 FFR. Venous blood gas values (CO2, pH, and bicarbonate) and vitals (respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, and saturation) were noted at baseline, 2 (T2), and 6 h (T6) after wearing the mask. Discomfort level was also measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 1-10.

Statistical analysis: Repeated measures analysis was done using repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman's test. Group comparisons for continuously distributed data were made using independent sample "t" test or Wilcoxon test.

Results and conclusion: Hemodynamic and blood gas values did not change over time. The VAS for discomfort because of respirator use was 1.33 (1.42) at T2 and 2.77 (1.91) at T6. This was a significant increase in discomfort over time (P = 0.001). About 80% of participants experienced discomfort during this period. N95 FFR did not lead to significant alteration in hemodynamics or change in blood gas values after 6 h of continuous usage. However, discomfort significantly increased over time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

N95过滤面罩对医护人员静脉血二氧化碳水平和血液动力学变化的影响。
背景:N95过滤面罩呼吸器(FFR)被医护人员用于预防空气传播感染,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,其使用增加了歧管。长期使用可能导致二氧化碳(CO2)积聚,影响血流动力学和血气值。尽管动脉血气值准确地测量血液CO2水平,但静脉血气值也显示出可接受的相关性。目的:评估N95 FFR对医护人员的生理影响,包括6小时内的血液动力学变化和静脉血CO2水平。设置和设计:三级护理医院的前瞻性观察性研究。方法:对30名戴N95 FFR执行日常工作的医护人员进行研究。在基线、戴口罩后2小时(T2)和6小时(T6)记录静脉血气值(CO2、pH和碳酸氢盐)和生命体征(呼吸频率、心率、血压和饱和度)。不适程度也采用1-10的视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量。统计分析:使用重复测量ANOVA或Friedman检验进行重复测量分析。使用独立样本“t”检验或Wilcoxon检验对连续分布数据进行分组比较。结果和结论:血液动力学和血气值没有随时间变化。T2时使用呼吸器引起的不适VAS为1.33(1.42),T6时为2.77(1.91)。随着时间的推移,不适感显著增加(P=0.001)。大约80%的参与者在这段时间内感到不适。连续使用6小时后,N95 FFR未导致血流动力学或血气值的显著变化。然而,随着时间的推移,不适感明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The website of Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine aims to make the printed version of the journal available to the scientific community on the web. The site is purely for educational purpose of the medical community. The site does not cater to the needs of individual patients and is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her existing physician.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信