Validation of the Pittsburgh Performance Fatigability Index in the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yujia Susanna Qiao, Jaroslaw Harezlak, Peggy M Cawthon, Steven R Cummings, Daniel E Forman, Bret H Goodpaster, Marquis Hawkins, Kyle D Moored, Barbara J Nicklas, Frederico G S Toledo, Pamela E Toto, Adam J Santanasto, Elsa S Strotmeyer, Anne B Newman, Nancy W Glynn
{"title":"Validation of the Pittsburgh Performance Fatigability Index in the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging.","authors":"Yujia Susanna Qiao, Jaroslaw Harezlak, Peggy M Cawthon, Steven R Cummings, Daniel E Forman, Bret H Goodpaster, Marquis Hawkins, Kyle D Moored, Barbara J Nicklas, Frederico G S Toledo, Pamela E Toto, Adam J Santanasto, Elsa S Strotmeyer, Anne B Newman, Nancy W Glynn","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glad197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pittsburgh Performance Fatigability Index (PPFI) quantifies the percent decline in cadence using accelerometry during standardized walking tasks. Although PPFI has shown strong correlations with physical performance, the developmental sample was relatively homogenous and small, necessitating further validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants from the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (N = 805, age = 76.4 ± 5.0 years, 58% women, 85% White) wore an ActiGraph GT9X on the nondominant wrist during usual-paced 400 m walk. Tri-axial accelerations were analyzed to compute PPFI (higher score = greater fatigability). To evaluate construct and discriminant validity, Spearman correlations (rs) between PPFI and gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), chair stand speed, leg peak power, VO2peak, perceived fatigability, and mood were examined. Sex-specific PPFI cut-points that optimally discriminated gait speed using classification and regression tree were then generated. Their discriminate power in relation to aforementioned physical performance were further evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median PPFI score was 1.4% (25th-75th percentile range: 0%-21.7%), higher among women than men (p < .001). PPFI score was moderate-to-strongly correlated with gait speed (rs = -0.75), SPPB score (rs = -0.38), chair stand speed (rs = -0.36), leg peak power (rs = -0.34) and VO2peak (rs = -0.40), and less strongly with perceived fatigability (rs = 0.28-0.29), all p < .001. PPFI score was not correlated with mood (|rs| < 0.08). Sex-specific PPFI cut-points (no performance fatigability: PPFI = 0%; mild performance fatigability: 0% < PPFI < 3.5% [women], 0% < PPFI < 5.4% [men]; moderate-to-severe performance fatigability: PPFI ≥ 3.5% [women], PPFI ≥ 5.4% [men]) discriminated physical performance (all p < .001), adjusted for demographics and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our work underscores the utility of PPFI as a valid measure to quantify performance fatigability in future longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical/pharmaceutical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":49953,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2387-2395"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glad197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Pittsburgh Performance Fatigability Index (PPFI) quantifies the percent decline in cadence using accelerometry during standardized walking tasks. Although PPFI has shown strong correlations with physical performance, the developmental sample was relatively homogenous and small, necessitating further validation.

Methods: Participants from the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (N = 805, age = 76.4 ± 5.0 years, 58% women, 85% White) wore an ActiGraph GT9X on the nondominant wrist during usual-paced 400 m walk. Tri-axial accelerations were analyzed to compute PPFI (higher score = greater fatigability). To evaluate construct and discriminant validity, Spearman correlations (rs) between PPFI and gait speed, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), chair stand speed, leg peak power, VO2peak, perceived fatigability, and mood were examined. Sex-specific PPFI cut-points that optimally discriminated gait speed using classification and regression tree were then generated. Their discriminate power in relation to aforementioned physical performance were further evaluated.

Results: Median PPFI score was 1.4% (25th-75th percentile range: 0%-21.7%), higher among women than men (p < .001). PPFI score was moderate-to-strongly correlated with gait speed (rs = -0.75), SPPB score (rs = -0.38), chair stand speed (rs = -0.36), leg peak power (rs = -0.34) and VO2peak (rs = -0.40), and less strongly with perceived fatigability (rs = 0.28-0.29), all p < .001. PPFI score was not correlated with mood (|rs| < 0.08). Sex-specific PPFI cut-points (no performance fatigability: PPFI = 0%; mild performance fatigability: 0% < PPFI < 3.5% [women], 0% < PPFI < 5.4% [men]; moderate-to-severe performance fatigability: PPFI ≥ 3.5% [women], PPFI ≥ 5.4% [men]) discriminated physical performance (all p < .001), adjusted for demographics and smoking status.

Conclusion: Our work underscores the utility of PPFI as a valid measure to quantify performance fatigability in future longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical/pharmaceutical trials.

匹兹堡疲劳性能指数在肌肉、运动和衰老研究中的验证。
背景:匹兹堡性能疲劳指数(PPFI)量化在标准化步行任务中使用加速度计的节奏下降百分比。虽然PPFI已显示出与物理性能的强相关性,但发育样本相对均匀且较小,需要进一步验证。方法:来自肌肉、活动和衰老研究的参与者(N = 805,年龄= 76.4±5.0岁,58%女性,85%白人)在常规400米步行时在非优势手腕佩戴ActiGraph GT9X。分析三轴加速度以计算PPFI(分数越高=疲劳程度越高)。为了评估结构效度和判别效度,研究了PPFI与步态速度、短时间物理性能电池(SPPB)、椅子站立速度、腿峰值功率、vo2峰值、感知疲劳和情绪之间的Spearman相关性(rs)。然后使用分类和回归树生成最佳区分步态速度的性别PPFI切点。进一步评估他们在上述身体表现方面的歧视能力。结果:PPFI评分中位数为1.4%(25 -75百分位范围:0%-21.7%),女性高于男性(p结论:我们的工作强调了PPFI在未来纵向流行病学研究和临床/药物试验中作为量化工作疲劳的有效措施的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Publishes articles representing the full range of medical sciences pertaining to aging. Appropriate areas include, but are not limited to, basic medical science, clinical epidemiology, clinical research, and health services research for professions such as medicine, dentistry, allied health sciences, and nursing. It publishes articles on research pertinent to human biology and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信