Analysis of povidone iodine, chlorhexidine acetate and polyhexamethylene biguanide as wound disinfectants: in vitro cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity.

IF 3.3 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Mingshi Zhang, Jian Jin, Yingying Liu, Chi Ben, Haihang Li, Dasheng Cheng, Yu Sun, Wang Guang-Yi, Shihui Zhu
{"title":"Analysis of povidone iodine, chlorhexidine acetate and polyhexamethylene biguanide as wound disinfectants: in vitro cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity.","authors":"Mingshi Zhang,&nbsp;Jian Jin,&nbsp;Yingying Liu,&nbsp;Chi Ben,&nbsp;Haihang Li,&nbsp;Dasheng Cheng,&nbsp;Yu Sun,&nbsp;Wang Guang-Yi,&nbsp;Shihui Zhu","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Even though disinfectants are commonly used in clinical practice and daily life, there are few studies on their antibacterial ability and cytotoxicity, which are closely related to the safety and effectiveness of their use. To provide a basis for the use of disinfectants, the cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of three most commonly used disinfectants, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine acetate and polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), were investigated.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A CCK-8 assay was used to measure the activities of human fibroblasts (HF) and keratinocytes (HaCat), the two most important cells in wound healing, following their exposure to disinfectants. The effects of different times and concentrations were included. The antibacterial activity of disinfectants against <i>Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> was reflected by their minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three disinfectants showed strong cytotoxicity in direct contact with HF and HaCat cells. Cytotoxicity increased with increasing exposure time and concentration. <i>S. aureus</i>, <i>A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae</i> comprised 70%, 55% and 85% of the strains sensitive to povidone iodine; 50%, 45% and 80% of the strains sensitive to chlorhexidine acetate; and 60%, 45% and 80% of the strains sensitive to PHMB, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three disinfectants were cytotoxic; therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the use time and concentration in the clinical setting. All three disinfectants were cytotoxic, with povidone-iodine being the most cytotoxic even at low concentrations. PHMB had better antibacterial efficacy against <i>S. aureus</i> and is suitable for the treatment of shallow wounds primarily. All three tested bacteria were significantly more sensitive to PHMB than to the other disinfectants.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407393/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Even though disinfectants are commonly used in clinical practice and daily life, there are few studies on their antibacterial ability and cytotoxicity, which are closely related to the safety and effectiveness of their use. To provide a basis for the use of disinfectants, the cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity of three most commonly used disinfectants, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine acetate and polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), were investigated.

Design: A CCK-8 assay was used to measure the activities of human fibroblasts (HF) and keratinocytes (HaCat), the two most important cells in wound healing, following their exposure to disinfectants. The effects of different times and concentrations were included. The antibacterial activity of disinfectants against Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae was reflected by their minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration.

Results: All three disinfectants showed strong cytotoxicity in direct contact with HF and HaCat cells. Cytotoxicity increased with increasing exposure time and concentration. S. aureus, A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae comprised 70%, 55% and 85% of the strains sensitive to povidone iodine; 50%, 45% and 80% of the strains sensitive to chlorhexidine acetate; and 60%, 45% and 80% of the strains sensitive to PHMB, respectively.

Conclusions: All three disinfectants were cytotoxic; therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the use time and concentration in the clinical setting. All three disinfectants were cytotoxic, with povidone-iodine being the most cytotoxic even at low concentrations. PHMB had better antibacterial efficacy against S. aureus and is suitable for the treatment of shallow wounds primarily. All three tested bacteria were significantly more sensitive to PHMB than to the other disinfectants.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

聚维酮碘、醋酸氯己定和聚六亚甲基双胍作为伤口消毒剂的体外细胞毒性和抗菌活性分析。
目的:尽管消毒剂在临床和日常生活中被广泛使用,但对其抗菌能力和细胞毒性的研究却很少,而这与使用的安全性和有效性密切相关。研究了聚维酮碘、醋酸氯己定和聚六亚甲基双胍(PHMB)三种常用消毒剂的细胞毒性和抗菌活性,为消毒剂的使用提供依据。设计:采用CCK-8测定法测定人成纤维细胞(HF)和角化细胞(HaCat)暴露于消毒剂后伤口愈合过程中最重要的两种细胞的活性。包括不同时间和浓度的影响。消毒剂对金黄色葡萄球菌、鲍曼不动杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌的抑菌活性表现为最低抑菌浓度和最低杀菌浓度。结果:三种消毒剂与HF和HaCat细胞直接接触均表现出较强的细胞毒性。细胞毒性随暴露时间和浓度的增加而增加。金黄色葡萄球菌、鲍曼不动杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分别占聚维酮碘敏感菌株的70%、55%和85%;50%、45%和80%的菌株对醋酸氯己定敏感;对PHMB敏感的菌株分别为60%、45%和80%。结论:3种消毒剂均具有细胞毒性;因此,在临床设置时要注意使用时间和浓度。所有三种消毒剂都具有细胞毒性,聚维酮碘即使在低浓度下也具有最大的细胞毒性。PHMB对金黄色葡萄球菌有较好的抗菌效果,主要适用于浅创面的治疗。所有三种测试细菌对PHMB的敏感性明显高于其他消毒剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信