Effectiveness of Acapella along with institutional based chest physiotherapy techniques on pulmonary functions and airway clearance in post-operative CABG patients.

Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1142/S101370252250007X
Bhagyashree Jage, Anuprita Thakur
{"title":"Effectiveness of Acapella along with institutional based chest physiotherapy techniques on pulmonary functions and airway clearance in post-operative CABG patients.","authors":"Bhagyashree Jage,&nbsp;Anuprita Thakur","doi":"10.1142/S101370252250007X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery often develop pulmonary complications in the early post-operative period as result of decreased lung function and impaired cough. Conventional physiotherapy in early post-operative period aims at increasing lung volumes and airway clearance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the addition of Acapella to conventional chest physiotherapy in improving lung volumes and secretion clearance in early post-operative CABG patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patients of both genders (40-70 years) who had undergone CABG and were in Phase I of Cardiac Rehabilitation were involved in this pilot randomized control trial (9 control, 11 experimental). Post-surgery intervention commenced on post-operative day 2 (POD 2) and continued till POD 6. Patients in the control group were given conventional physiotherapy that included breathing exercises, incentive spirometry and manual techniques. Patient in the experimental group used an Acapella device along with the conventional intervention. Outcome measures considered were pulmonary function parameters (FVC, FEV1 & PEFR) and amount of sputum expectorated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant increase in lung volumes was observed in both the groups on POD 6 as compared to POD 2 (<math><mstyle><mtext>both</mtext></mstyle><mo><</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>01</mn></math>). However, the increase was significantly greater on POD 6 in experimental group than the control group [mean difference (95% CI) FVC: 0.44 L (0.24-0.63), FEV1: 0.43 L (0.19-0.66), PEFR: 0.86 L/s (0.57-1.14)]. The amount of sputum expectoration significantly greater in the experimental group as compared to the control group [2.71 mL (0.53-4.90)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of Acapella enhanced the effect conventional physiotherapy in improving lung volumes and airway clearance in the early post-operative period for CABG patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/ca/hkpj-42-081.PMC10406641.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S101370252250007X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery often develop pulmonary complications in the early post-operative period as result of decreased lung function and impaired cough. Conventional physiotherapy in early post-operative period aims at increasing lung volumes and airway clearance.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the addition of Acapella to conventional chest physiotherapy in improving lung volumes and secretion clearance in early post-operative CABG patients.

Methods: Twenty patients of both genders (40-70 years) who had undergone CABG and were in Phase I of Cardiac Rehabilitation were involved in this pilot randomized control trial (9 control, 11 experimental). Post-surgery intervention commenced on post-operative day 2 (POD 2) and continued till POD 6. Patients in the control group were given conventional physiotherapy that included breathing exercises, incentive spirometry and manual techniques. Patient in the experimental group used an Acapella device along with the conventional intervention. Outcome measures considered were pulmonary function parameters (FVC, FEV1 & PEFR) and amount of sputum expectorated.

Results: A significant increase in lung volumes was observed in both the groups on POD 6 as compared to POD 2 (both<0.01). However, the increase was significantly greater on POD 6 in experimental group than the control group [mean difference (95% CI) FVC: 0.44 L (0.24-0.63), FEV1: 0.43 L (0.19-0.66), PEFR: 0.86 L/s (0.57-1.14)]. The amount of sputum expectoration significantly greater in the experimental group as compared to the control group [2.71 mL (0.53-4.90)].

Conclusion: The addition of Acapella enhanced the effect conventional physiotherapy in improving lung volumes and airway clearance in the early post-operative period for CABG patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
Acapella联合基于机构的胸部物理治疗技术对CABG术后患者肺功能和气道清除率的影响。
背景:接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的患者在术后早期由于肺功能下降和咳嗽受损而发生肺部并发症。术后早期常规物理治疗旨在增加肺容量和气道清除率。目的:本研究旨在确定在常规胸部物理治疗基础上加用阿卡贝拉对早期CABG术后患者肺容量和分泌物清除率的改善效果。方法:选取20例已行CABG手术并处于心脏康复I期的患者,年龄40-70岁,男女均有,其中对照组9例,试验组11例。术后干预从术后第2天(POD 2)开始,持续到POD 6。对照组患者接受常规物理治疗,包括呼吸练习、刺激肺活量测定和手工技术。实验组患者在常规干预的同时使用Acapella装置。考虑的结局指标是肺功能参数(FVC、FEV1和PEFR)和咳痰量。结果:与POD 2组相比,POD 6组肺容量显著增加(均为0.01)。然而,实验组POD 6的增加明显大于对照组[平均差异(95% CI) FVC: 0.44 L (0.24-0.63), FEV1: 0.43 L (0.19-0.66), PEFR: 0.86 L/s(0.57-1.14)]。实验组痰量明显高于对照组[2.71 mL(0.53-4.90)]。结论:Acapella的加入增强了常规物理治疗在术后早期改善CABG患者肺容量和气道清除率方面的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信