Detecting early physiologic changes through cardiac implantable electronic device data among patients with COVID-19

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Meghan Reading Turchioe PhD, MPH, RN , Rezwan Ahmed PhD , Ruth Masterson Creber PhD, MSc, RN , Kelly Axsom MD , Evelyn Horn MD , Gabriel Sayer MD , Nir Uriel MD , Kenneth Stein MD, FHRS , David Slotwiner MD, FHRS
{"title":"Detecting early physiologic changes through cardiac implantable electronic device data among patients with COVID-19","authors":"Meghan Reading Turchioe PhD, MPH, RN ,&nbsp;Rezwan Ahmed PhD ,&nbsp;Ruth Masterson Creber PhD, MSc, RN ,&nbsp;Kelly Axsom MD ,&nbsp;Evelyn Horn MD ,&nbsp;Gabriel Sayer MD ,&nbsp;Nir Uriel MD ,&nbsp;Kenneth Stein MD, FHRS ,&nbsp;David Slotwiner MD, FHRS","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.07.070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) may enable early identification of COVID-19 to facilitate timelier intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To characterize early physiologic changes associated with the onset of acute COVID-19 infection, as well as during and after acute infection, among patients with CIEDs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>CIED sensor data from March 2020 to February 2021 from 286 patients with a CIED were linked to clinical data from electronic health records. Three cohorts were created: known COVID-positive (n = 20), known COVID-negative (n = 166), and a COVID-untested control group (n = 100) included to account for testing bias. Associations between changes in CIED sensors from baseline (including HeartLogic index, a composite index predicting worsening heart failure) and COVID-19 status were evaluated using logistic regression models, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Significant differences existed between the cohorts by race, ethnicity, CIED device type, and medical admissions. Several sensors changed earlier for COVID-positive vs COVID-negative patients: HeartLogic index (mean 16.4 vs 9.2 days [<em>P</em> = .08]), respiratory rate (mean 8.5 vs 3.9 days [<em>P</em> = .01], and activity (mean 8.2 vs 3.5 days [<em>P</em> = .008]). Respiratory rate during the 7 days before testing significantly predicted a positive vs negative COVID-19 test, adjusting for age, sex, race, and device type (odds ratio 2.31 [95% confidence interval 1.33–5.13]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Physiologic data from CIEDs could signal early signs of infection that precede clinical symptoms, which may be used to support early detection of infection to prevent decompensation in this at-risk population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"3 5","pages":"Pages 247-255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9349024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693622001190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) may enable early identification of COVID-19 to facilitate timelier intervention.

Objective

To characterize early physiologic changes associated with the onset of acute COVID-19 infection, as well as during and after acute infection, among patients with CIEDs.

Methods

CIED sensor data from March 2020 to February 2021 from 286 patients with a CIED were linked to clinical data from electronic health records. Three cohorts were created: known COVID-positive (n = 20), known COVID-negative (n = 166), and a COVID-untested control group (n = 100) included to account for testing bias. Associations between changes in CIED sensors from baseline (including HeartLogic index, a composite index predicting worsening heart failure) and COVID-19 status were evaluated using logistic regression models, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

Significant differences existed between the cohorts by race, ethnicity, CIED device type, and medical admissions. Several sensors changed earlier for COVID-positive vs COVID-negative patients: HeartLogic index (mean 16.4 vs 9.2 days [P = .08]), respiratory rate (mean 8.5 vs 3.9 days [P = .01], and activity (mean 8.2 vs 3.5 days [P = .008]). Respiratory rate during the 7 days before testing significantly predicted a positive vs negative COVID-19 test, adjusting for age, sex, race, and device type (odds ratio 2.31 [95% confidence interval 1.33–5.13]).

Conclusion

Physiologic data from CIEDs could signal early signs of infection that precede clinical symptoms, which may be used to support early detection of infection to prevent decompensation in this at-risk population.

Abstract Image

利用心脏植入式电子设备数据检测COVID-19患者早期生理变化
心脏植入式电子装置(CIEDs)可以早期识别COVID-19,从而促进更及时的干预。目的了解cied患者与COVID-19急性感染发病相关的早期生理变化,以及急性感染期间和之后的生理变化。方法将286例CIED患者2020年3月至2021年2月的scied传感器数据与电子健康记录中的临床数据相关联。创建了三个队列:已知covid - 19阳性(n = 20),已知covid - 19阴性(n = 166),以及一个未经covid - 19测试的对照组(n = 100),以解释测试偏差。使用logistic回归模型、Wilcoxon sign rank检验和Mann-Whitney U检验评估CIED传感器从基线(包括HeartLogic指数,一种预测心力衰竭恶化的综合指数)变化与COVID-19状态之间的关系。结果不同种族、民族、CIED装置类型和就诊情况的队列之间存在显著差异。新冠病毒阳性和新冠病毒阴性患者的几个传感器变化较早:心脏逻辑指数(平均16.4天对9.2天[P = .08])、呼吸频率(平均8.5天对3.9天[P = .01])和活动(平均8.2天对3.5天[P = .008])。经年龄、性别、种族和设备类型调整后,检测前7天的呼吸频率可显著预测COVID-19检测阳性与阴性(优势比2.31[95%置信区间1.33-5.13])。结论cied的生理数据可以在临床症状出现之前提示感染的早期迹象,这可能用于支持感染的早期发现,以防止这一高危人群的代偿失调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信