ChatGPT: "To Be or Not to Be" in Bikini Bottom.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Aaron B Weingrad, Stephen J Cozza
{"title":"ChatGPT: \"To Be or Not to Be\" in Bikini Bottom.","authors":"Aaron B Weingrad,&nbsp;Stephen J Cozza","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2023.2238617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective:</i> In this report, we tested ChatGPT's ability to think abstractly and to integrate information about two seemingly disparate topics by requesting a well-articulated, intellectually stimulating essay in response to a complex and somewhat paradoxical task. <i>Method:</i> We asked ChatGPT to write a satirical essay comparing SpongeBob Squarepants to Shakespeare's Hamlet and examined its ability to create a cohesive essay using abstract thinking. <i>Findings:</i> ChatGPT's comparison of Hamlet and SpongeBob was successful, comprehensive, and convincing, demonstrating the ability to make judgments and to use appropriate metaphors and idioms. <i>Conclusions:</i> Our findings suggest that ChatGPT can respond to complex tasks using abstract thinking.</p>","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":"86 3","pages":"249-254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2023.2238617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this report, we tested ChatGPT's ability to think abstractly and to integrate information about two seemingly disparate topics by requesting a well-articulated, intellectually stimulating essay in response to a complex and somewhat paradoxical task. Method: We asked ChatGPT to write a satirical essay comparing SpongeBob Squarepants to Shakespeare's Hamlet and examined its ability to create a cohesive essay using abstract thinking. Findings: ChatGPT's comparison of Hamlet and SpongeBob was successful, comprehensive, and convincing, demonstrating the ability to make judgments and to use appropriate metaphors and idioms. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ChatGPT can respond to complex tasks using abstract thinking.

在比奇堡的“生存还是毁灭”。
目的:在这个报告中,我们测试了ChatGPT的抽象思维能力,以及通过要求一个清晰的、智力刺激的文章来回应一个复杂的、有点矛盾的任务,将两个看似不同的主题的信息整合起来的能力。方法:我们要求ChatGPT写一篇讽刺文章,将海绵宝宝和莎士比亚的哈姆雷特进行比较,并测试其使用抽象思维创作连贯文章的能力。调查结果:ChatGPT对哈姆雷特和海绵宝宝的比较是成功的,全面的,令人信服的,显示了判断能力和使用适当的隐喻和习语的能力。结论:我们的研究结果表明,ChatGPT可以通过抽象思维对复杂任务做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internationally recognized, Psychiatry has responded to rapid research advances in psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, trauma, and psychopathology. Increasingly, studies in these areas are being placed in the context of human development across the lifespan, and the multiple systems that influence individual functioning. This journal provides broadly applicable and effective strategies for dealing with the major unsolved problems in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信