Prognostic Importance of Combined Use of MELD Scores and SII in Hepatic Visceral Crisis in Patients with Solid Tumours.

Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.879
Fatih Tay, Mustafa Buyukkor, Ayse Ocak Duran
{"title":"Prognostic Importance of Combined Use of MELD Scores and SII in Hepatic Visceral Crisis in Patients with Solid Tumours.","authors":"Fatih Tay,&nbsp;Mustafa Buyukkor,&nbsp;Ayse Ocak Duran","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the sensitivity of combining the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring with new inflammatory indexes in determining the priority for liver transplantation and demonstrating its potential usability in solid tumour visceral crisis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from June 2017 to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong> Patients hospitalised in the medical oncology clinic for hepatic dysfunction were included. The MELD scores of these patients were calculated, and the predictive contribution of the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) to prognosis and mortality was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 295 patients (158 (53.6%) men and 137 (46.4%) women) were included. When compared for primary tumour types, colorectal cancers were the most common with 55 (18.6%) cases, followed by breast cancers at 52 (17.6%), pancreatic carcinoma at 50 (16.9%), and stomach cancers at 40 (13.6%) cases. In the survival analyses of all three MELD scores (MELD-Original, MELD-Na, and MELD 3.0) between <20 groups and ≥20 groups, the median Overall Survival (OS) for MELD-Original was 1.44 vs. 0.88 months (p<0.001), for MELD- Na it was 1.64 vs. 0.85 months (p<0.001), and for MELD 3.0 it was 2.16 vs. 1.28 months (p=0.039). In the ROC analysis, the SII parameter cut-off was ≥626.28 for the estimation of mortality, SII sensitivity was 78.7%, and specificity was 100% (p=0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined use of MELD and SII scores in patients with solid tumours with hepatic visceral crises will be practical, cost-effective, and easy to access, eliminate gender-based disparities, and contribute to clinical follow-ups with objective data.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Malignant neoplasm, MELD score, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0, SII.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"33 8","pages":"879-883"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To determine the sensitivity of combining the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring with new inflammatory indexes in determining the priority for liver transplantation and demonstrating its potential usability in solid tumour visceral crisis.

Study design: Descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from June 2017 to June 2022.

Methodology:  Patients hospitalised in the medical oncology clinic for hepatic dysfunction were included. The MELD scores of these patients were calculated, and the predictive contribution of the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) to prognosis and mortality was evaluated.

Results: A total of 295 patients (158 (53.6%) men and 137 (46.4%) women) were included. When compared for primary tumour types, colorectal cancers were the most common with 55 (18.6%) cases, followed by breast cancers at 52 (17.6%), pancreatic carcinoma at 50 (16.9%), and stomach cancers at 40 (13.6%) cases. In the survival analyses of all three MELD scores (MELD-Original, MELD-Na, and MELD 3.0) between <20 groups and ≥20 groups, the median Overall Survival (OS) for MELD-Original was 1.44 vs. 0.88 months (p<0.001), for MELD- Na it was 1.64 vs. 0.85 months (p<0.001), and for MELD 3.0 it was 2.16 vs. 1.28 months (p=0.039). In the ROC analysis, the SII parameter cut-off was ≥626.28 for the estimation of mortality, SII sensitivity was 78.7%, and specificity was 100% (p=0.013).

Conclusion: Combined use of MELD and SII scores in patients with solid tumours with hepatic visceral crises will be practical, cost-effective, and easy to access, eliminate gender-based disparities, and contribute to clinical follow-ups with objective data.

Key words: Malignant neoplasm, MELD score, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0, SII.

分享
查看原文
MELD评分和SII联合应用在实体肿瘤患者肝脏器危象中的预后重要性。
目的:探讨终末期肝病(MELD)评分模型与新的炎症指标相结合在确定肝移植优先级中的敏感性,并证明其在实体瘤脏器危像中的潜在可用性。研究设计:描述性研究。研究地点和时间:Abdurrahman Yurtaslan肿瘤培训和研究医院,土耳其安卡拉,2017年6月至2022年6月。方法:纳入因肝功能障碍住院的肿瘤内科门诊患者。计算这些患者的MELD评分,并评估全身免疫炎症指数(SII)对预后和死亡率的预测作用。结果:共纳入295例患者,其中男性158例(53.6%),女性137例(46.4%)。当比较原发性肿瘤类型时,结直肠癌最常见,有55例(18.6%),其次是乳腺癌52例(17.6%),胰腺癌50例(16.9%),胃癌40例(13.6%)。在MELD- original, MELD- na和MELD 3.0之间的所有三个MELD评分的生存分析中,结论:MELD和SII评分在合并肝脏器危像的实体瘤患者中联合使用将是实用的,具有成本效益,易于获取,消除了基于性别的差异,并有助于客观数据的临床随访。关键词:恶性肿瘤,MELD评分,MELD- na, MELD 3.0, SII
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信