Analyzing Resilience in the Orthopedic Sports Medicine Patient Population.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-09 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20230804-04
John Hayden Sonnier, Austin M Looney, Emma E Johnson, Zac Fuller, Fotios P Tjoumakaris, Kevin B Freedman
{"title":"Analyzing Resilience in the Orthopedic Sports Medicine Patient Population.","authors":"John Hayden Sonnier, Austin M Looney, Emma E Johnson, Zac Fuller, Fotios P Tjoumakaris, Kevin B Freedman","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20230804-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little research has been done to compare resilience, as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), across common sports medicine patient populations. Our purpose was to investigate resilience levels across sports medicine patient populations. All patients who underwent reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACLR), partial meniscectomy (PM), meniscal repair (MR), rotator cuff repair (RCR), or shoulder stabilization (SS) between January 1 and June 30, 2020, were screened for inclusion. At our institution, BRS scores are routinely collected during the preoperative period. Patients with preoperative BRS scores available were included for analysis. Patients who were eligible on the basis of ACLR who underwent concomitant PM or MR were included in the ACL group. A total of 655 patients with a median age of 49 years were included in analysis. The median preoperative resilience score across all patients was 3.83 (interquartile range, 3.50-4.17), and the highest scores were seen in the ACLR group (median, 4.00; interquartile range, 3.67-4.17). On multivariate regression, scores were significantly and independently lower in the PM and RCR groups. Male patients were found to have significantly higher scores than female patients overall (<i>P</i>=.028), but in subgroup analysis by pathology, this effect was only seen in the SS and PM groups. Psychological factors are important to consider when surgically treating patients, and resilience specifically may play a role in predicting treatment success. Patients undergoing PM and RCR tend to report lower resilience scores than patients undergoing ACLR at preoperative baseline. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2024;47(2):95-100.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20230804-04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little research has been done to compare resilience, as measured by the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), across common sports medicine patient populations. Our purpose was to investigate resilience levels across sports medicine patient populations. All patients who underwent reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACLR), partial meniscectomy (PM), meniscal repair (MR), rotator cuff repair (RCR), or shoulder stabilization (SS) between January 1 and June 30, 2020, were screened for inclusion. At our institution, BRS scores are routinely collected during the preoperative period. Patients with preoperative BRS scores available were included for analysis. Patients who were eligible on the basis of ACLR who underwent concomitant PM or MR were included in the ACL group. A total of 655 patients with a median age of 49 years were included in analysis. The median preoperative resilience score across all patients was 3.83 (interquartile range, 3.50-4.17), and the highest scores were seen in the ACLR group (median, 4.00; interquartile range, 3.67-4.17). On multivariate regression, scores were significantly and independently lower in the PM and RCR groups. Male patients were found to have significantly higher scores than female patients overall (P=.028), but in subgroup analysis by pathology, this effect was only seen in the SS and PM groups. Psychological factors are important to consider when surgically treating patients, and resilience specifically may play a role in predicting treatment success. Patients undergoing PM and RCR tend to report lower resilience scores than patients undergoing ACLR at preoperative baseline. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):95-100.].

分析骨科运动医学患者的恢复能力。
通过简易复原力量表(BRS)对普通运动医学患者群体的复原力进行比较的研究很少。我们的目的是调查运动医学患者群体的复原力水平。所有在 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日期间接受过前交叉韧带(ACLR)重建术、半月板部分切除术(PM)、半月板修复术(MR)、肩袖修复术(RCR)或肩关节稳定术(SS)的患者均被纳入筛选范围。我院在术前常规收集 BRS 评分。有术前 BRS 评分的患者被纳入分析范围。前交叉韧带组包括符合前交叉韧带置换术条件且同时接受 PM 或 MR 的患者。共有 655 名患者参与分析,中位年龄为 49 岁。所有患者术前复原力评分的中位数为 3.83(四分位数间距为 3.50-4.17),其中 ACLR 组的评分最高(中位数为 4.00;四分位数间距为 3.67-4.17)。在多变量回归中,PM 组和 RCR 组的得分明显较低,而且是独立的。男性患者的总体评分明显高于女性患者(P=.028),但在按病理进行的亚组分析中,只有 SS 和 PM 组出现了这种效应。在对患者进行手术治疗时,心理因素是需要考虑的重要因素,特别是复原力可能在预测治疗成功方面发挥作用。与接受前交叉韧带重建术的患者相比,接受PM和RCR手术的患者在术前基线时的复原力评分往往较低。[Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):95-100.].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信