Outcomes of aortic root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome: the role of valve-sparing and valve-replacing approaches.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Joseph S Coselli, Irina V Volguina, Lynna Nguyen, Susan Y Green, Scott A LeMaire, Marc R Moon
{"title":"Outcomes of aortic root replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome: the role of valve-sparing and valve-replacing approaches.","authors":"Joseph S Coselli,&nbsp;Irina V Volguina,&nbsp;Lynna Nguyen,&nbsp;Susan Y Green,&nbsp;Scott A LeMaire,&nbsp;Marc R Moon","doi":"10.21037/acs-2023-avs2-0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a heritable thoracic aortic disease with pervasive cardiovascular effects, including commonly, a dilated aortic root. Traditionally, the root is replaced using a mechanical composite valve graft (CVG); however, this valve-replacing (VR) approach necessitates a lifelong regimen of anticoagulation with a potential for late bleeding complications. In time, valve-sparing (VS) approaches were developed. Today, several options for aortic root replacement (ARR) exist; each has advantages and disadvantages that helps inform choice. The Aortic Valve Operative Outcomes in Marfan Patients (AVOMP) is a multi-center international registry to analyze clinical outcomes of ARR in MFS patients using either VR or VS techniques to better elucidate choice. We summarize outcomes of AVOMP and present our own experience. Methods We performed 223 consecutive elective ARR [1991–2023] in patients with MFS; 15 such repairs were included in AVOMP. Repairs included 113 (51%) using a mechanical CVG, 62 (28%) using a VS approach, and 48 (22%) using a bioprosthetic root. Many patients underwent aortic arch repair (30% to 54% by type). Results The median patient age was 38 [29–52] years. In comparing VS and VR groups, patients were similar in age and rates of major comorbidities and symptoms. Patients with VR repair had a more complex aortic history. The rate of redo sternotomy was 24% (n=54). Operative death was uncommon [4% overall (10/223); ranging from 2% to 8% by type], and stroke was rare [1/223 (<1%)]. Late survival and reoperation differed by operative approach; survival was improved in patients who underwent VS repair. Conclusions We found that repair in patients with MFS undergoing ARR resulted in low operative risk. Our late results were similar to those of AVOMP in that patients undergoing VS repair tended to experience greater rates of valvular-structural deterioration, although this did not appear to impact survival.","PeriodicalId":8067,"journal":{"name":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","volume":"12 4","pages":"338-349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/9f/acs-12-04-338.PMC10405346.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2023-avs2-0085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a heritable thoracic aortic disease with pervasive cardiovascular effects, including commonly, a dilated aortic root. Traditionally, the root is replaced using a mechanical composite valve graft (CVG); however, this valve-replacing (VR) approach necessitates a lifelong regimen of anticoagulation with a potential for late bleeding complications. In time, valve-sparing (VS) approaches were developed. Today, several options for aortic root replacement (ARR) exist; each has advantages and disadvantages that helps inform choice. The Aortic Valve Operative Outcomes in Marfan Patients (AVOMP) is a multi-center international registry to analyze clinical outcomes of ARR in MFS patients using either VR or VS techniques to better elucidate choice. We summarize outcomes of AVOMP and present our own experience. Methods We performed 223 consecutive elective ARR [1991–2023] in patients with MFS; 15 such repairs were included in AVOMP. Repairs included 113 (51%) using a mechanical CVG, 62 (28%) using a VS approach, and 48 (22%) using a bioprosthetic root. Many patients underwent aortic arch repair (30% to 54% by type). Results The median patient age was 38 [29–52] years. In comparing VS and VR groups, patients were similar in age and rates of major comorbidities and symptoms. Patients with VR repair had a more complex aortic history. The rate of redo sternotomy was 24% (n=54). Operative death was uncommon [4% overall (10/223); ranging from 2% to 8% by type], and stroke was rare [1/223 (<1%)]. Late survival and reoperation differed by operative approach; survival was improved in patients who underwent VS repair. Conclusions We found that repair in patients with MFS undergoing ARR resulted in low operative risk. Our late results were similar to those of AVOMP in that patients undergoing VS repair tended to experience greater rates of valvular-structural deterioration, although this did not appear to impact survival.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

马凡氏综合征患者主动脉根置换术的结果:保留瓣膜和瓣膜置换术的作用。
背景:马凡氏综合征(MFS)是一种遗传性胸主动脉疾病,具有普遍的心血管影响,通常包括主动脉根扩张。传统上,使用机械复合瓣膜移植物(CVG)代替根;然而,这种瓣膜置换(VR)方法需要终身抗凝治疗,并有可能出现晚期出血并发症。随着时间的推移,阀门保护(VS)方法被开发出来。目前,存在几种主动脉根部置换(ARR)的选择;每一种都有优点和缺点,有助于做出选择。马凡患者主动脉瓣手术结局(AVOMP)是一项多中心国际注册研究,旨在使用VR或VS技术分析MFS患者ARR的临床结果,以更好地阐明选择。我们总结了AVOMP的结果,并提出了自己的经验。方法:我们对223例MFS患者进行了连续选择性ARR [1991-2023];在AVOMP中包括15次这样的修理。修复包括113例(51%)使用机械CVG, 62例(28%)使用VS方法,48例(22%)使用生物修复根。许多患者接受了主动脉弓修复(按类型划分为30% - 54%)。结果:患者中位年龄38岁[29-52]岁。在VS组和VR组的比较中,患者的年龄和主要合并症和症状的发生率相似。VR修复患者的主动脉病史更为复杂。胸骨切开术复发率为24% (n=54)。手术死亡不常见[总体为4% (10/223);[1/223]结论:我们发现,接受ARR的MFS患者的修复导致较低的手术风险。我们的最新结果与AVOMP相似,接受VS修复的患者往往经历更大的瓣膜结构恶化率,尽管这似乎不影响生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信