Cross-cultural Study of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) across the Portuguese and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Community and Clinical Populations.

Q2 Medicine

Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130

Olga Coelho, Rute Pires, Ana Sousa Ferreira, Bruno Gonçalves, Samia A Alkhoori, Mohamed Sayed, Amany ElRasheed, Maryam AlJassmi, Joana Henriques-Calado, Joana Stocker

{"title":"Cross-cultural Study of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) across the Portuguese and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Community and Clinical Populations.","authors":"Olga Coelho, Rute Pires, Ana Sousa Ferreira, Bruno Gonçalves, Samia A Alkhoori, Mohamed Sayed, Amany ElRasheed, Maryam AlJassmi, Joana Henriques-Calado, Joana Stocker","doi":"10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The present paper focused on compare the PID-5 mean score levels across two matched community and clinical samples of Portugal and the UAE.Background: The generalizability and universality of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders has been thoroughly studied through the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) across countries and languages. However, studies comparing Western and Middle Eastern countries are still limited, in particular those who assess the PID-5 measurement invariance.Objectives: We examined measurement invariance of the PID-5 scales across matched Emirati and Portuguese clinical and nonclinical groups, as well as compare and contrast the PID-5 mean score levels across both countries and samples.Methods: The Arabic and the Portuguese versions of the PID-5 was administered to Emirati community participants (N = 300, 80% women and 20% men, Mage = 27.95) which were matched with Portuguese community participants (N = 300, 80.3% women and 19.7% men, Mage = 28.96), as well as clinical participants of the UAE (N = 150, 61.3% women and 38.7% men, Mage = 31.29) and Portugal (N = 150, 52% men and 48% women, Mage = 44.97). We examined measurement invariance through an unrestricted Factor Analysis based program, and mean scores levels were compared and analyzed.Results: Our findings supported the PID-5 measurement invariance across the Emirati and Portuguese clinical samples pointing to the universality and generalizability of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders. The Emirati psychiatric sample exhibited somehow higher results than the Portuguese psychiatric participants, albeit the small effect size for most of the PID-5 scales.Conclusion: Further research is needed to examine the applicability of the PID-5 across non-clinical representative samples of Portugal and the UAE, and other Middle Eastern countries.","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156022/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: The present paper focused on compare the PID-5 mean score levels across two matched community and clinical samples of Portugal and the UAE.

Background: The generalizability and universality of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders has been thoroughly studied through the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) across countries and languages. However, studies comparing Western and Middle Eastern countries are still limited, in particular those who assess the PID-5 measurement invariance.

Objectives: We examined measurement invariance of the PID-5 scales across matched Emirati and Portuguese clinical and nonclinical groups, as well as compare and contrast the PID-5 mean score levels across both countries and samples.

Methods: The Arabic and the Portuguese versions of the PID-5 was administered to Emirati community participants (N = 300, 80% women and 20% men, M_age = 27.95) which were matched with Portuguese community participants (N = 300, 80.3% women and 19.7% men, M_age = 28.96), as well as clinical participants of the UAE (N = 150, 61.3% women and 38.7% men, M_age = 31.29) and Portugal (N = 150, 52% men and 48% women, M_age = 44.97). We examined measurement invariance through an unrestricted Factor Analysis based program, and mean scores levels were compared and analyzed.

Results: Our findings supported the PID-5 measurement invariance across the Emirati and Portuguese clinical samples pointing to the universality and generalizability of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders. The Emirati psychiatric sample exhibited somehow higher results than the Portuguese psychiatric participants, albeit the small effect size for most of the PID-5 scales.

Conclusion: Further research is needed to examine the applicability of the PID-5 across non-clinical representative samples of Portugal and the UAE, and other Middle Eastern countries.

查看原文本刊更多论文

DSM-5 (PID-5)人格量表在葡萄牙和阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)社区和临床人群中的跨文化研究。

目的:本论文重点比较了葡萄牙和阿联酋两个匹配的社区和临床样本的PID-5平均得分水平。背景:通过DSM-5人格量表(PID-5)，对人格障碍替代模型的可泛化性和普适性进行了跨国家和跨语言的深入研究。然而，比较西方和中东国家的研究仍然有限，特别是那些评估PID-5测量不变性的研究。目的:我们在匹配的阿联酋和葡萄牙临床和非临床组中检查了PID-5量表的测量不变性，并比较和对比了两国和样本的PID-5平均得分水平。方法:对阿联酋社区参与者(N = 300人，女性占80%，男性占20%，Mage = 27.95)、葡萄牙社区参与者(N = 300人，女性占80.3%，男性占19.7%，Mage = 28.96)、阿联酋临床参与者(N = 150人，女性占61.3%，男性占38.7%，Mage = 31.29)和葡萄牙临床参与者(N = 150人，男性占52%，女性占48%，Mage = 44.97)进行阿拉伯语和葡萄牙语版本的id -5测试。我们通过一个基于不受限制因子分析的程序来检验测量不变性，并对平均得分水平进行比较和分析。结果:我们的研究结果支持了阿联酋和葡萄牙临床样本中PID-5测量的不变性，指出了人格障碍替代模型的普遍性和概泛性。阿联酋精神病学样本显示出比葡萄牙精神病学参与者更高的结果，尽管对大多数PID-5量表的影响较小。结论:需要进一步研究PID-5在葡萄牙、阿联酋和其他中东国家非临床代表性样本中的适用性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.