Changes in Perioperative Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy during the COVID-19 Era

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
William N. Doyle Jr , Diep Nguyen , William J. West III , Cole R. Fiedler , Kristie M. Labib , Lauren Ladehoff , Allison O. Dumitriu Carcoana , Jenna C. Marek , Jose A. Malavet , Carla C. Moodie , Joseph R. Garrett , Jenna R. Tew , Jobelle J.A.R. Baldonado , Jacques P. Fontaine , Eric M. Toloza
{"title":"Changes in Perioperative Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy during the COVID-19 Era","authors":"William N. Doyle Jr ,&nbsp;Diep Nguyen ,&nbsp;William J. West III ,&nbsp;Cole R. Fiedler ,&nbsp;Kristie M. Labib ,&nbsp;Lauren Ladehoff ,&nbsp;Allison O. Dumitriu Carcoana ,&nbsp;Jenna C. Marek ,&nbsp;Jose A. Malavet ,&nbsp;Carla C. Moodie ,&nbsp;Joseph R. Garrett ,&nbsp;Jenna R. Tew ,&nbsp;Jobelle J.A.R. Baldonado ,&nbsp;Jacques P. Fontaine ,&nbsp;Eric M. Toloza","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic presented patients with barriers to receiving healthcare. We sought to determine whether changes in healthcare access and practice during the pandemic affected perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy (RAPL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed 721 consecutive patients who underwent RAPL. With March 1<sup>st</sup>, 2020, defining the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, we grouped 638 patients as “PreCOVID-19” and 83 patients as “COVID-19-Era” based on surgical date. Demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, intraoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. Variables were compared utilizing Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Chi-square (or Fisher's exact) test, with significance at p<span><math><mrow><mo>≤</mo><mn>0.05</mn><mo>.</mo></mrow></math></span> Multivariable generalized linear regression was used to investigate predictors of postoperative complication.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>COVID-19-Era patients had significantly higher preoperative FEV1%, lower cumulative smoking history and higher incidences of preoperative atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and bleeding disorders compared to PreCOVID-19 patients. COVID-19-Era patients had lower intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), reduced incidence of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), but higher incidence of effusion or empyema postoperatively. Overall postoperative complication rates between the groups were similar. Older age, increased EBL, lower preoperative FEV1%, and preoperative COPD are all predictive of an increased risk for postoperative complication.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>COVID-19-Era patients having lower EBL and less new-onset POAF, despite greater incidences of multiple preoperative comorbidities, demonstrates that RAPL is safe during the COVID-19 era. Risk factors for development of postoperative effusion should be determined to minimize risk of empyema in COVID-19-Era patients. Age, preoperative FEV1%, COPD, and EBL should all be considered when planning for complication risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic presented patients with barriers to receiving healthcare. We sought to determine whether changes in healthcare access and practice during the pandemic affected perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy (RAPL).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 721 consecutive patients who underwent RAPL. With March 1st, 2020, defining the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, we grouped 638 patients as “PreCOVID-19” and 83 patients as “COVID-19-Era” based on surgical date. Demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, intraoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. Variables were compared utilizing Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Chi-square (or Fisher's exact) test, with significance at p0.05. Multivariable generalized linear regression was used to investigate predictors of postoperative complication.

Results

COVID-19-Era patients had significantly higher preoperative FEV1%, lower cumulative smoking history and higher incidences of preoperative atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and bleeding disorders compared to PreCOVID-19 patients. COVID-19-Era patients had lower intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), reduced incidence of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), but higher incidence of effusion or empyema postoperatively. Overall postoperative complication rates between the groups were similar. Older age, increased EBL, lower preoperative FEV1%, and preoperative COPD are all predictive of an increased risk for postoperative complication.

Conclusions

COVID-19-Era patients having lower EBL and less new-onset POAF, despite greater incidences of multiple preoperative comorbidities, demonstrates that RAPL is safe during the COVID-19 era. Risk factors for development of postoperative effusion should be determined to minimize risk of empyema in COVID-19-Era patients. Age, preoperative FEV1%, COPD, and EBL should all be considered when planning for complication risk.

新型冠状病毒肺炎时代机器人辅助肺叶切除术围手术期结局的变化
背景新冠肺炎大流行给患者提供了获得医疗保健的障碍。我们试图确定疫情期间医疗服务和实践的变化是否会影响机器人辅助肺叶切除术(RAPL)后的围手术期结果。方法我们回顾性分析了721例连续接受RAPL的患者。2020年3月1日是新冠肺炎大流行的开始,根据手术日期,我们将638名患者分为“新冠肺炎前期”,83名患者分为了“新冠病毒Era”。分析人口统计学、合并症、肿瘤特征、术中并发症、发病率和死亡率。采用Student t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验和卡方检验(或Fisher精确检验)对变量进行比较,显著性p≤0.05。多变量广义线性回归用于研究术后并发症的预测因素。结果与新冠肺炎前期患者相比,新冠肺炎患者术前FEV1%显著升高,累计吸烟史较低,术前心房颤动、外周血管疾病(PVD)和出血障碍的发生率较高。COVID-19-Era患者术中估计出血量(EBL)较低,术后新发心房颤动(POAF)的发生率较低,但术后积液或脓胸的发生率较高。两组的术后并发症发生率相似。年龄较大、EBL增加、术前FEV1%降低和术前COPD都预示着术后并发症的风险增加。结论COVID-19-Era患者EBL较低,新发POAF较少,尽管术前多种合并症的发生率较高,但这表明RAPL在新冠肺炎时代是安全的。应确定术后积液发生的危险因素,以最大限度地降低COVID-19-Era患者出现脓胸的风险。在规划并发症风险时,应考虑年龄、术前FEV1%、COPD和EBL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信