Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor.

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Tricia Thompson, Adrian Rogers, Johnna Perry
{"title":"Consumer-Led Investigation into Potential Issues That Arise When Testing Dairy Matrixes for Gluten With the NIMA Sensor.","authors":"Tricia Thompson, Adrian Rogers, Johnna Perry","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsad092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some consumers with celiac disease use personal, point-of-use gluten detection devices to test food. False-positive results may occur due to sampling, matrix effects, and sensor issues.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to determine if the positive gluten results some users were obtaining when testing cream cheese and materials of similar consistency were false positives and, if so, what might be causing them to occur.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cream cheese, soft cheese, and yogurt were tested for gluten using the Ridascreen Gliadin R7001 sandwich R5 ELISA and the Ridascreen Gliadin R7021 competitive R5 ELISA. Two test portions were taken, extracted, and tested from each homogenized material. Materials were also analyzed for gluten using a NIMA sensor, a personal, point-of-use gluten detection device. Multiple test portion weights were tested beginning at 0.13 to 0.17 g (the ideal weight of the test portion according to the NIMA sensor development team).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the sandwich R5 ELISA and the competitive R5 ELISA, all materials tested below the lower LOD for gluten. Using a NIMA sensor, as the weight of the test portion tested increased, sensor results went from no gluten found, to gluten found, to no test result.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The gluten found results using the NIMA sensor are likely false positives that appear to correspond with the weight and volume of the material tested, as well as the viscosity. There is also an apparent disconnect between the gluten found result reported by the sensor and an interpretation of the lateral flow device (LFD) strip result when assessed by eye which should also be taken into account. Ideally, NIMA sensor users should be advised on the weight amount of material to analyze and test portions should be weighed before being used with the NIMA sensor. However, this is not a practical solution when testing in many environments, including restaurants.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Slight variations in weight and volume of test materials can result in false positive results when testing dairy matrixes for gluten using the Nima sensor.</p>","PeriodicalId":15003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":"1696-1700"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsad092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some consumers with celiac disease use personal, point-of-use gluten detection devices to test food. False-positive results may occur due to sampling, matrix effects, and sensor issues.

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine if the positive gluten results some users were obtaining when testing cream cheese and materials of similar consistency were false positives and, if so, what might be causing them to occur.

Methods: Cream cheese, soft cheese, and yogurt were tested for gluten using the Ridascreen Gliadin R7001 sandwich R5 ELISA and the Ridascreen Gliadin R7021 competitive R5 ELISA. Two test portions were taken, extracted, and tested from each homogenized material. Materials were also analyzed for gluten using a NIMA sensor, a personal, point-of-use gluten detection device. Multiple test portion weights were tested beginning at 0.13 to 0.17 g (the ideal weight of the test portion according to the NIMA sensor development team).

Results: Using the sandwich R5 ELISA and the competitive R5 ELISA, all materials tested below the lower LOD for gluten. Using a NIMA sensor, as the weight of the test portion tested increased, sensor results went from no gluten found, to gluten found, to no test result.

Conclusion: The gluten found results using the NIMA sensor are likely false positives that appear to correspond with the weight and volume of the material tested, as well as the viscosity. There is also an apparent disconnect between the gluten found result reported by the sensor and an interpretation of the lateral flow device (LFD) strip result when assessed by eye which should also be taken into account. Ideally, NIMA sensor users should be advised on the weight amount of material to analyze and test portions should be weighed before being used with the NIMA sensor. However, this is not a practical solution when testing in many environments, including restaurants.

Highlights: Slight variations in weight and volume of test materials can result in false positive results when testing dairy matrixes for gluten using the Nima sensor.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

消费者主导的调查在使用NIMA传感器检测谷蛋白乳制品基质时出现的潜在问题。
背景:一些患有乳糜泻的消费者使用个人的、即用即用的谷蛋白检测设备来检测食物。由于采样、矩阵效应和传感器问题,可能会出现假阳性结果。目的:本研究的目的是确定一些用户在测试奶油奶酪和类似稠度的材料时获得的阳性面筋结果是否为假阳性,如果是,是什么原因导致了假阳性。方法:使用Ridascreen Gliadin R7001夹心R5 ELISA和Ridascren GliadinR7021竞争性R5 ELISA检测奶油奶酪、软奶酪和酸奶的面筋。从每种均化材料中取出、提取并测试两个测试部分。还使用NIMA传感器对材料的面筋进行了分析,NIMA传感器是一种个人使用点面筋检测设备。从0.13至0.17克(根据NIMA传感器开发团队的说法,这是测试部分的理想重量)开始测试多个测试部分的重量。结果:使用三明治R5 ELISA和竞争性R5 ELISA,所有材料的测试都低于面筋的较低LOD。使用NIMA传感器,随着测试部分重量的增加,传感器结果从没有发现麸质,到发现麸质再到没有测试结果。结论:使用NIMA传感器发现的面筋结果可能是假阳性,似乎与测试材料的重量和体积以及粘度相对应。传感器报告的面筋发现结果与用眼睛评估时对侧流装置(LFD)条带结果的解释之间也存在明显的脱节,这也应考虑在内。理想情况下,应向NIMA传感器用户建议要分析的材料的重量,并在与NIMA传感器一起使用之前对测试部分进行称重。然而,在包括餐馆在内的许多环境中进行测试时,这并不是一个实用的解决方案。亮点:当使用Nima传感器测试乳制品基质中的面筋时,测试材料的重量和体积的微小变化可能会导致假阳性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of AOAC International
Journal of AOAC International 医学-分析化学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
144
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL publishes the latest in basic and applied research in analytical sciences related to foods, drugs, agriculture, the environment, and more. The Journal is the method researchers'' forum for exchanging information and keeping informed of new technology and techniques pertinent to regulatory agencies and regulated industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信