Dietitian-led micronutrient management in a public bariatric surgery outpatient clinic.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-06 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12836
Carrie-Anne Lewis, Joanne Hiatt, Susan de Jersey, Emma J Osland, Ingrid J Hickman
{"title":"Dietitian-led micronutrient management in a public bariatric surgery outpatient clinic.","authors":"Carrie-Anne Lewis, Joanne Hiatt, Susan de Jersey, Emma J Osland, Ingrid J Hickman","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to explore the multidisciplinary team attitudes and knowledge of bariatric surgery micronutrient management (pre- and postoperative care) and to evaluate the implementation of an extended-scope of practice dietitian-led model of care for micronutrient monitoring and management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed method study design included quantitative evaluation of micronutrient testing practices and deficiency rates. Qualitative reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret multidisciplinary experience with micronutrient monitoring in a traditional and dietitian-led model of care. In addition, deductive analysis used normalisation process theory mapping of multidisciplinary experience with the implementation of the dietitian-led model of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the traditional model, a lack of quality evidence to guide micronutrient management, and a tension in trust between surgeons and patients related to adherence to micronutrient prescriptions were described as challenges in current practice. The dietitian-led model was seen to overcome some of these challenges, increasing collaborative, and coordinated, consistent and personalised patient care that led to increased testing for and detection of micronutrient deficiencies. Barriers to sustainability of the dietitian-led model included a lack of workforce succession planning, and no clearly defined delegation for some aspects of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An extended scope dietitian-led model of care for micronutrient management after bariatric surgery improves clinical care. Challenges such as succession planning must be considered in design of extended scope services.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to explore the multidisciplinary team attitudes and knowledge of bariatric surgery micronutrient management (pre- and postoperative care) and to evaluate the implementation of an extended-scope of practice dietitian-led model of care for micronutrient monitoring and management.

Methods: A mixed method study design included quantitative evaluation of micronutrient testing practices and deficiency rates. Qualitative reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret multidisciplinary experience with micronutrient monitoring in a traditional and dietitian-led model of care. In addition, deductive analysis used normalisation process theory mapping of multidisciplinary experience with the implementation of the dietitian-led model of care.

Results: In the traditional model, a lack of quality evidence to guide micronutrient management, and a tension in trust between surgeons and patients related to adherence to micronutrient prescriptions were described as challenges in current practice. The dietitian-led model was seen to overcome some of these challenges, increasing collaborative, and coordinated, consistent and personalised patient care that led to increased testing for and detection of micronutrient deficiencies. Barriers to sustainability of the dietitian-led model included a lack of workforce succession planning, and no clearly defined delegation for some aspects of care.

Conclusion: An extended scope dietitian-led model of care for micronutrient management after bariatric surgery improves clinical care. Challenges such as succession planning must be considered in design of extended scope services.

公共减肥手术门诊中由营养师主导的微量营养素管理。
目的:本研究旨在探讨多学科团队对减肥手术微量营养素管理(术前和术后护理)的态度和知识,并评估以营养师为主导的微量营养素监测和管理的扩展实践范围护理模式的实施情况:混合方法研究设计包括对微量营养素检测方法和缺乏率进行定量评估。采用定性反思性主题分析法来解释在传统和营养师主导的护理模式下进行微量营养素监测的多学科经验。此外,演绎分析法还对营养师主导型护理模式实施过程中的多学科经验进行了归一化过程理论分析:结果:在传统模式中,缺乏高质量的证据来指导微量营养素管理,以及外科医生和患者之间在遵守微量营养素处方方面的信任关系紧张,这些都是当前实践中面临的挑战。营养师主导的模式被认为克服了其中的一些挑战,加强了合作、协调、一致和个性化的病人护理,从而增加了微量营养素缺乏症的检测和发现。营养师主导模式可持续发展的障碍包括缺乏劳动力继任规划,以及某些护理方面没有明确的授权:结论:以营养师为主导的减肥手术后微量营养素管理护理模式能够改善临床护理。结论:由营养师主导的减肥手术后微量营养素管理模式能够改善临床护理,但在设计扩展服务范围时必须考虑继任规划等挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信