Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Neem Leaf Extract, Propolis, and Orange Oil when used as Endodontic Irrigants: An in vitro Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.

Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-30 DOI:10.4103/ccd.ccd_611_21
Ria Setia, Nitika Bajaj, Meenu Bhola, Gurlal Singh Brar
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Neem Leaf Extract, Propolis, and Orange Oil when used as Endodontic Irrigants: An <i>in vitro</i> Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.","authors":"Ria Setia,&nbsp;Nitika Bajaj,&nbsp;Meenu Bhola,&nbsp;Gurlal Singh Brar","doi":"10.4103/ccd.ccd_611_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In root canal treatment, chemical debridement of the root canal with the help of irrigants is important due to the complex internal anatomy of the teeth. Biomechanical root canal preparation produces a smear layer. It covers the dentinal tubules, which may interfere with the penetration of various irrigants and intracanal medicaments, so the smear layer has to be removed. The potential side effects and certain limitations of chemical irrigants for smear layer removal have led to a shift toward herbal alternatives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the smear layer removal efficacy of Neem leaf extract, Propolis, and Orange oil as endodontic irrigants using the scanning electron microscope.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety samples were taken and then randomly (simple random sampling method) divided into three experimental groups (<i>n</i> = 30) depending upon different endodontic irrigants used: Group 1-Neem leaf extract, Group 2-Orange oil and Group 3-Propolis and smear layer removal evaluation was done under the scanning electron microscope Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at all the levels, i.e., coronal, middle, and apical.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The collected data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Group 1 (Neem leaf extract) showed the highest smear layer removal efficacy, which was followed by Group 2 (Orange oil) and the least efficacy of smear layer removal was shown by Group 3 (Propolis) at coronal, middle, and apical levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Group 1 (Neem leaf extract) performed significantly better in removing the smear layer at coronal, middle, and apical levels as compared to the other two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/93/CCD-14-128.PMC10399795.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_611_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In root canal treatment, chemical debridement of the root canal with the help of irrigants is important due to the complex internal anatomy of the teeth. Biomechanical root canal preparation produces a smear layer. It covers the dentinal tubules, which may interfere with the penetration of various irrigants and intracanal medicaments, so the smear layer has to be removed. The potential side effects and certain limitations of chemical irrigants for smear layer removal have led to a shift toward herbal alternatives.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the smear layer removal efficacy of Neem leaf extract, Propolis, and Orange oil as endodontic irrigants using the scanning electron microscope.

Materials and methods: Ninety samples were taken and then randomly (simple random sampling method) divided into three experimental groups (n = 30) depending upon different endodontic irrigants used: Group 1-Neem leaf extract, Group 2-Orange oil and Group 3-Propolis and smear layer removal evaluation was done under the scanning electron microscope Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at all the levels, i.e., coronal, middle, and apical.

Results: The collected data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Group 1 (Neem leaf extract) showed the highest smear layer removal efficacy, which was followed by Group 2 (Orange oil) and the least efficacy of smear layer removal was shown by Group 3 (Propolis) at coronal, middle, and apical levels.

Conclusion: Group 1 (Neem leaf extract) performed significantly better in removing the smear layer at coronal, middle, and apical levels as compared to the other two groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
印楝叶提取物、蜂胶和橙油用作口腔正畸冲洗剂时去除涂抹层效果的比较评价:体外扫描电子显微镜研究。
引言:在根管治疗中,由于牙齿内部解剖结构复杂,在冲洗剂的帮助下对根管进行化学清创是很重要的。生物力学根管预备产生涂抹层。它覆盖了牙本质小管,这可能会干扰各种冲洗剂和肛门内药物的渗透,因此必须去除涂抹层。化学冲洗剂去除涂抹层的潜在副作用和某些局限性导致人们转向草药替代品。目的:利用扫描电镜对印楝叶提取物、蜂胶和橙油作为根管冲洗剂去除涂抹层的效果进行评价和比较。材料和方法:取90个样品,然后根据使用的不同根管冲洗剂随机分为三个实验组(n=30):第1组-印楝叶提取物,在扫描电子显微镜扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下,在所有水平(即冠状、中间和顶端)上进行第2组橙油和第3组前列腺和涂抹层去除评估。结果:采用卡方检验对收集到的数据进行分析。第1组(印楝叶提取物)的涂抹层去除效果最高,其次是第2组(橙油),第3组(蜂胶)在冠状、中间和顶端的涂抹层清除效果最低。结论:与其他两组相比,第1组(印楝叶提取物)在去除冠部、中部和顶端的涂抹层方面表现明显更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信