Adherence to Iron Chelation Therapy among Adults with Thalassemia: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Margaret Locke, Paavani S Reddy, Sherif M Badawy
{"title":"Adherence to Iron Chelation Therapy among Adults with Thalassemia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Margaret Locke,&nbsp;Paavani S Reddy,&nbsp;Sherif M Badawy","doi":"10.1080/03630269.2022.2072320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Iron chelation therapy (ICT) is essential to prevent complications of iron overload in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia. However, the role that adherence to ICT plays in health-related outcomes is less well known. Our objectives were to identify adherence rates of ICT, and to assess methods of measurement, predictors of adherence, and adherence-related health outcomes in the literature published between 1980 and 2020. Of 543 articles, 43 met the inclusion criteria. Studies measured ICT adherence, predictors, and/or outcomes associated with adherence. Most studies were across multiple countries in Europe and North America (<i>n</i> = 8/43, 18.6%), recruited in clinics (<i>n</i> = 39/43, 90.7%), and focused on β-thalassemia (β-thal) (<i>n</i> = 25/43, 58.1%). Common methods of assessing ICT adherence included patient self-report (<i>n</i> = 24/43, 55.8%), pill count (<i>n</i> = 9/43, 20.9%), prescription refill history (<i>n</i> = 3/43, 7.0%), provider scoring (<i>n</i> = 3/43, 7.0%), and combinations of methods (<i>n</i> = 4/43, 9.3%). Studies reported adherence either in 'categories' with different levels of adherence (<i>n</i> = 24) or 'quantitatively' as a percentage of doses of medication taken out of those prescribed (<i>n</i> = 17). Adherence levels varied (median 91.7%, range 42.0-99.97%). Studies varied in sample size and methods of adherence assessment and reporting, which prohibited meta-analysis. Due to a lack of consensus on how adherence is defined, it is difficult to compare ICT adherence reporting. Further research is needed to establish guidelines for assessing adherence and identifying suboptimal adherence. Behavioral digital interventions have the potential to optimize ICT adherence and health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12997,"journal":{"name":"Hemoglobin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948767/pdf/nihms-1871956.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemoglobin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630269.2022.2072320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Iron chelation therapy (ICT) is essential to prevent complications of iron overload in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia. However, the role that adherence to ICT plays in health-related outcomes is less well known. Our objectives were to identify adherence rates of ICT, and to assess methods of measurement, predictors of adherence, and adherence-related health outcomes in the literature published between 1980 and 2020. Of 543 articles, 43 met the inclusion criteria. Studies measured ICT adherence, predictors, and/or outcomes associated with adherence. Most studies were across multiple countries in Europe and North America (n = 8/43, 18.6%), recruited in clinics (n = 39/43, 90.7%), and focused on β-thalassemia (β-thal) (n = 25/43, 58.1%). Common methods of assessing ICT adherence included patient self-report (n = 24/43, 55.8%), pill count (n = 9/43, 20.9%), prescription refill history (n = 3/43, 7.0%), provider scoring (n = 3/43, 7.0%), and combinations of methods (n = 4/43, 9.3%). Studies reported adherence either in 'categories' with different levels of adherence (n = 24) or 'quantitatively' as a percentage of doses of medication taken out of those prescribed (n = 17). Adherence levels varied (median 91.7%, range 42.0-99.97%). Studies varied in sample size and methods of adherence assessment and reporting, which prohibited meta-analysis. Due to a lack of consensus on how adherence is defined, it is difficult to compare ICT adherence reporting. Further research is needed to establish guidelines for assessing adherence and identifying suboptimal adherence. Behavioral digital interventions have the potential to optimize ICT adherence and health outcomes.

Abstract Image

成人地中海贫血患者坚持铁螯合治疗:一项系统综述。
铁螯合治疗(ICT)对于预防输血依赖型地中海贫血患者铁超载并发症至关重要。然而,坚持使用信通技术在健康相关结果中所起的作用却鲜为人知。我们的目标是确定ICT的依从率,并评估1980年至2020年间发表的文献中的测量方法、依从性的预测因素和依从性相关的健康结果。543篇文章中,43篇符合纳入标准。研究测量了ICT依从性、预测因素和/或与依从性相关的结果。大多数研究来自欧洲和北美的多个国家(n = 8/43, 18.6%),在诊所招募(n = 39/43, 90.7%),重点研究β-地中海贫血(β-thal) (n = 25/43, 58.1%)。评估ICT依从性的常用方法包括患者自我报告(n = 24/43, 55.8%)、药片计数(n = 9/43, 20.9%)、处方续药史(n = 3/43, 7.0%)、提供者评分(n = 3/43, 7.0%)和方法组合(n = 4/43, 9.3%)。研究报告的依从性要么是不同程度的“类别”(n = 24),要么是“定量”(n = 17),即服用处方药物剂量的百分比。依从性水平各不相同(中位数91.7%,范围42.0-99.97%)。研究的样本量和依从性评估和报告方法各不相同,这就禁止了荟萃分析。由于对如何定义依从性缺乏共识,很难比较ICT依从性报告。需要进一步的研究来建立评估依从性和识别次优依从性的指南。行为数字干预具有优化信息通信技术依从性和健康结果的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hemoglobin
Hemoglobin 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Hemoglobin is a journal in the English language for the communication of research and information concerning hemoglobin in humans and other species. Hemoglobin publishes articles, reviews, points of view The journal covers topics such as: structure, function, genetics and evolution of hemoglobins biochemical and biophysical properties of hemoglobin molecules characterization of hemoglobin disorders (variants and thalassemias), consequences and treatment of hemoglobin disorders epidemiology and prevention of hemoglobin disorders (neo-natal and adult screening) modulating factors methodology used for diagnosis of hemoglobin disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信