The potential of conventional and bulk-fill bioactive composites to inhibit the development of caries lesions around restorations.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-06-01
Daylana P Silva, Matheus Kury, Camila S S Coelho, Mayara Dos S Noronha, Beatriz de O Medeiros, Carolina B André, Cinthia P M Tabchoury, Vanessa Cavalli
{"title":"The potential of conventional and bulk-fill bioactive composites to inhibit the development of caries lesions around restorations.","authors":"Daylana P Silva,&nbsp;Matheus Kury,&nbsp;Camila S S Coelho,&nbsp;Mayara Dos S Noronha,&nbsp;Beatriz de O Medeiros,&nbsp;Carolina B André,&nbsp;Cinthia P M Tabchoury,&nbsp;Vanessa Cavalli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine caries inhibition potential of conventional and bulk-fill bioactive composites around restorations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Enamel and dentin blocks were prepared using a diamond saw under water irrigation, finished (SiC, 600- and 800-grit) and polished (SiC 1,200, final polish= 0.2 μm). Blocks were then selected through enamel surface microhardness, and enamel and dentin standard cavities were restored (n=10/group) with conventional bioactive composite (Beautifil II, BTF), bulk-fill bioactive composite (Activa BioACTIVE, ACT), glass-ionomer cement (Ionofil Plus, ION), conventional composite (GrandioSO, GSO), and bulk-fill composite (Admira Fusion X-TRA, ADM). Afterwards, the blocks were subjected to pH cycling: 4 hours in demineralization and 20 hours in remineralization solutions for 7 days, before being cut in the middle. One half was used to calculate the carious lesion area (ΔS) using values obtained by cross-sectional microhardness (CSMH) testing. The other half was submitted to polarized light microscopy (PLM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The % of internal gap formation (GAP) of restorations' replicas were analyzed under SEM. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey test (α= 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of CSMH, ION group exhibited the lowest ΔS values, with no significant difference to ADM. The composites BTF and ACT were similar to each other (P< 0.05) and to their negative controls (GSO and ADM), respectively. ION showed lower caries formation under PLM, whereas the GSO group presented a greater demineralized area. ION presented the highest % of internal GAP formation. Bioactive composites (BTF and ACT) were similar to their corresponding conventional ones (GSO and ADM) in terms of GAP formation.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The glass-ionomer cement was more effective in inhibiting the formation of caries lesions around restorations. Because of the glass-ionomer cement's limited application in high load-bearing areas, the conventional bioactive composite would be a promising clinical choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"36 3","pages":"136-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine caries inhibition potential of conventional and bulk-fill bioactive composites around restorations.

Methods: Enamel and dentin blocks were prepared using a diamond saw under water irrigation, finished (SiC, 600- and 800-grit) and polished (SiC 1,200, final polish= 0.2 μm). Blocks were then selected through enamel surface microhardness, and enamel and dentin standard cavities were restored (n=10/group) with conventional bioactive composite (Beautifil II, BTF), bulk-fill bioactive composite (Activa BioACTIVE, ACT), glass-ionomer cement (Ionofil Plus, ION), conventional composite (GrandioSO, GSO), and bulk-fill composite (Admira Fusion X-TRA, ADM). Afterwards, the blocks were subjected to pH cycling: 4 hours in demineralization and 20 hours in remineralization solutions for 7 days, before being cut in the middle. One half was used to calculate the carious lesion area (ΔS) using values obtained by cross-sectional microhardness (CSMH) testing. The other half was submitted to polarized light microscopy (PLM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The % of internal gap formation (GAP) of restorations' replicas were analyzed under SEM. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey test (α= 5%).

Results: In terms of CSMH, ION group exhibited the lowest ΔS values, with no significant difference to ADM. The composites BTF and ACT were similar to each other (P< 0.05) and to their negative controls (GSO and ADM), respectively. ION showed lower caries formation under PLM, whereas the GSO group presented a greater demineralized area. ION presented the highest % of internal GAP formation. Bioactive composites (BTF and ACT) were similar to their corresponding conventional ones (GSO and ADM) in terms of GAP formation.

Clinical significance: The glass-ionomer cement was more effective in inhibiting the formation of caries lesions around restorations. Because of the glass-ionomer cement's limited application in high load-bearing areas, the conventional bioactive composite would be a promising clinical choice.

传统和散装填充生物活性复合材料抑制修复体周围龋齿病变发展的潜力。
目的:比较常规生物活性复合材料和填充型生物活性复合材料在修复体周围的龋抑制潜力。方法:用金刚石锯在水冲洗下制备牙釉质和牙本质块,抛光(SiC, 600和800),抛光(SiC 1200,最终抛光= 0.2 μm)。然后通过牙釉质表面显微硬度选择牙釉质块,用常规生物活性复合材料(Beautifil II, BTF)、填充型生物活性复合材料(Activa bioactive, ACT)、玻璃离子聚合物水泥(Ionofil Plus, ION)、常规复合材料(GrandioSO, GSO)和填充型复合材料(Admira Fusion X-TRA, ADM)修复牙釉质和牙本质标准腔(n=10/组)。然后进行pH循环:脱矿4小时,再矿化溶液20小时,持续7天,中间切割。其中一半用于计算龋病面积(ΔS),使用横截面显微硬度(CSMH)测试得到的值。另一半进行偏振光显微镜(PLM)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查。在扫描电镜下分析修复体复制品的内部间隙形成率(gap)。数据采用方差分析和Tukey检验(α= 5%)。结果:在CSMH方面,离子组ΔS值最低,与ADM差异无统计学意义。复合材料BTF和ACT与阴性对照GSO和ADM相似(P< 0.05)。PLM组ION组龋形成较低,而GSO组脱矿面积较大。离子的内部GAP形成率最高。生物活性复合材料(BTF和ACT)在GAP形成方面与相应的常规复合材料(GSO和ADM)相似。临床意义:玻璃离子水门栓能更有效地抑制修复体周围龋齿的形成。由于玻璃离聚体水泥在高承载区域的应用有限,传统的生物活性复合材料将是一种有前途的临床选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信