Meeting the wellness needs of emergency department clinicians: A scoping review of interventions

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Karen M. Gerrard , Julie Shepherd , Rajesh Sehdev , Vinay Gangathimmaiah , Cate Nagle
{"title":"Meeting the wellness needs of emergency department clinicians: A scoping review of interventions","authors":"Karen M. Gerrard ,&nbsp;Julie Shepherd ,&nbsp;Rajesh Sehdev ,&nbsp;Vinay Gangathimmaiah ,&nbsp;Cate Nagle","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2022.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Emergency Departments are stressful </span>work environments that can adversely affect clinicians’ wellbeing. The purpose of this scoping review was to report wellness interventions evaluated in Emergency Departments and clinicians’ experience of these interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five data bases were searched using a modification of Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews were employed to report the findings. The review included only peer-reviewed articles and had no date or language restrictions applied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions included tactile massage, hypnosis, mindfulness, happiness practice, resiliency, meditation, and video-based debriefing. Three key themes emerged following data extraction and analysis: The value of mindfulness; One size doesn’t fit all; and Enablers and Barriers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Successful wellness programs<span> must be relevant to Emergency Departments and staff need to be involved in the development and application of these programs to achieve maximum benefit. For long term benefits and sustainability, the strategies must be supported by senior hospital management.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 169-178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X22000872","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Emergency Departments are stressful work environments that can adversely affect clinicians’ wellbeing. The purpose of this scoping review was to report wellness interventions evaluated in Emergency Departments and clinicians’ experience of these interventions.

Methods

Five data bases were searched using a modification of Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews were employed to report the findings. The review included only peer-reviewed articles and had no date or language restrictions applied.

Results

Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions included tactile massage, hypnosis, mindfulness, happiness practice, resiliency, meditation, and video-based debriefing. Three key themes emerged following data extraction and analysis: The value of mindfulness; One size doesn’t fit all; and Enablers and Barriers.

Conclusions

Successful wellness programs must be relevant to Emergency Departments and staff need to be involved in the development and application of these programs to achieve maximum benefit. For long term benefits and sustainability, the strategies must be supported by senior hospital management.

满足急诊科临床医生的健康需求:干预措施的范围审查
背景急诊科是一种压力很大的工作环境,会对临床医生的健康产生不利影响。本范围审查的目的是报告急诊科评估的健康干预措施和临床医生对这些干预措施的经验。方法对Arksey和O'Malley框架进行改进,检索5个数据库。PRISMA范围审查指南用于报告调查结果。审查只包括同行评审的文章,没有日期或语言限制。结果9项研究符合入选标准。干预措施包括触觉按摩、催眠、正念、快乐练习、弹性、冥想和基于视频的汇报。在数据提取和分析之后,出现了三个关键主题:正念的价值;一种尺寸不适合所有人;结论成功的健康计划必须与急诊部门相关,员工需要参与这些计划的开发和应用,以实现最大效益。为了长期效益和可持续性,这些战略必须得到医院高级管理层的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信