Intra- and inter-observer agreement in distal radius fracture dislocation measurement of casting position.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Katriina Paasikallio, Reijo Sund, Simo Miettinen, Sonja Kauranen, Hannu Sorsa, Heikki Kröger, Joonas Sirola
{"title":"Intra- and inter-observer agreement in distal radius fracture dislocation measurement of casting position.","authors":"Katriina Paasikallio,&nbsp;Reijo Sund,&nbsp;Simo Miettinen,&nbsp;Sonja Kauranen,&nbsp;Hannu Sorsa,&nbsp;Heikki Kröger,&nbsp;Joonas Sirola","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2023.13707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Most displaced distal radius fractures (DRF) are treated nonoperatively, with reduction and immobilization in a cast. Studies assessing intra- or inter-observer agreement on radiologic measurements of casting position have not been published, which was the aim of our study.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Our study is based on the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention (OSTPRE) study. All detected DRFs during the OSTPRE follow-up were retrieved and based on sample size calculations 50 fractures were randomly selected for the study. 5 independent reviewers measured dislocation parameters and wrist position in a cast from the radiographs. A linear mixed model was used to estimate the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and total deviance index (TDI) that were used to evaluate intra- and inter-observer agreement. We used Kappa values to determine intra- and inter-rater agreement on radiographically acceptable reduction of the DRF. Limits of acceptable position were those defined by Finnish Current Care Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For radial inclination, radial shortening, and dorsal/volar tilt, intra- and inter-observer correlations were high (CCC > 0.76). In addition, measurements of wrist angle in a splint had high correlations (CCC > 0.78), whereas measurement of intra-articular gap and step had poor correlations (CCC < 0.52). The Kappa value for overall agreement on the radiographically acceptable position of the DRF was modest (0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intra- and inter-observer repeatability of casting position of radial inclination, radial shortening, and dorsal/volar tilt were high whereas intra-articular gap and step had poor correlations.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"94 ","pages":"379-386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/58/fb/ActaO-94-13707.PMC10370410.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.13707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Most displaced distal radius fractures (DRF) are treated nonoperatively, with reduction and immobilization in a cast. Studies assessing intra- or inter-observer agreement on radiologic measurements of casting position have not been published, which was the aim of our study.

Patients and methods: Our study is based on the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention (OSTPRE) study. All detected DRFs during the OSTPRE follow-up were retrieved and based on sample size calculations 50 fractures were randomly selected for the study. 5 independent reviewers measured dislocation parameters and wrist position in a cast from the radiographs. A linear mixed model was used to estimate the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and total deviance index (TDI) that were used to evaluate intra- and inter-observer agreement. We used Kappa values to determine intra- and inter-rater agreement on radiographically acceptable reduction of the DRF. Limits of acceptable position were those defined by Finnish Current Care Guidelines.

Results: For radial inclination, radial shortening, and dorsal/volar tilt, intra- and inter-observer correlations were high (CCC > 0.76). In addition, measurements of wrist angle in a splint had high correlations (CCC > 0.78), whereas measurement of intra-articular gap and step had poor correlations (CCC < 0.52). The Kappa value for overall agreement on the radiographically acceptable position of the DRF was modest (0.59).

Conclusion: Intra- and inter-observer repeatability of casting position of radial inclination, radial shortening, and dorsal/volar tilt were high whereas intra-articular gap and step had poor correlations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

桡骨远端骨折位错测量的观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性。
背景和目的:大多数移位性桡骨远端骨折(DRF)采用非手术治疗,在石膏中复位和固定。评估铸造位置放射学测量的内部或内部观察者协议的研究尚未发表,这是我们研究的目的。患者和方法:我们的研究基于Kuopio骨质疏松症危险因素和预防(OSTPRE)研究。检索OSTPRE随访期间检测到的所有drf,并根据样本量计算随机选择50例骨折进行研究。5名独立评论者根据x线片测量了石膏脱位参数和手腕位置。使用线性混合模型估计一致性相关系数(CCC)和总偏差指数(TDI),用于评估观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性。我们使用Kappa值来确定放射学上可接受的DRF复位的内部和内部一致性。可接受体位的限制由芬兰现行护理指南定义。结果:对于径向倾斜、径向缩短和背侧/掌侧倾斜,观察者内部和观察者之间的相关性很高(CCC > 0.76)。此外,夹板腕部角度测量具有高相关性(CCC > 0.78),而关节内间隙和步长测量相关性较差(CCC < 0.52)。对于DRF放射学上可接受位置的总体一致性Kappa值是适度的(0.59)。结论:桡骨倾斜、桡骨缩短和关节背/掌侧倾斜的铸造位置在观察者内和观察者间的重复性较高,而关节内间隙和关节步距相关性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信