Bone Mineral Density in Mountain, Road Cyclists and Untrained Controls: Exercise, Diet and Hormones.

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Francesco Zamboni, Pietro Ferrari, Lucia Cazzoletti, Angela Setti, Francesco Bertoldo, Luca G Dalle Carbonare, Elisa Danese, Stefano Tardivo, Ernesto Crisafulli, Marcello Ferrari
{"title":"Bone Mineral Density in Mountain, Road Cyclists and Untrained Controls: Exercise, Diet and Hormones.","authors":"Francesco Zamboni, Pietro Ferrari, Lucia Cazzoletti, Angela Setti, Francesco Bertoldo, Luca G Dalle Carbonare, Elisa Danese, Stefano Tardivo, Ernesto Crisafulli, Marcello Ferrari","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2023.2242417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: The aim of the study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine (LS<sub>BMD</sub>) and the femoral neck (F<sub>BMD</sub>) in male road cyclists (RC <i>n</i> = 39), mountain cyclists (MC <i>n</i> = 30) and controls (C <i>n</i> = 27) and to determine the factors associated with BMD in the same group of participants. <b>Methods</b>: BMD, fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured using DXA. Calcium intake (Cal), exercise energy expenditure (EEE) and energy availability (EA) were assessed using self-reported questionnaires. Samples for circulating hormones were also obtained. VO<sub>2max</sub> was estimated by a cycloergometric test. <b>Results</b>: After adjustment for body mass, in cyclists LS<sub>BMD</sub> (RC 0.98 ± 0.12; MC 0.98 ± 0.10 g/cm<sup>2</sup>) was significantly lower than in C (1.11 ± 0.10; <i>p</i> < .001), while F<sub>BMD</sub> resulted in no significant difference in cyclists compared to C (<i>p</i> = 0.213). EA (kcal/FFM/day) was different in cyclists and in C (<i>p</i> < .05). In C, EEE and EA were positively associated with LS<sub>BMD</sub> (<i>R</i> = 0.561, <i>R</i> = 0.656, respectively, <i>p</i> < .01), whereas only EA was associated with F<sub>BMD</sub> (<i>R</i> = 0.554, <i>p</i> < .05); a positive association between EA and F<sub>BMD</sub> was found in MC (<i>R</i> = 0.464, <i>p</i> < .05). A negative relationship between VO<sub>2max</sub> and LS<sub>BMD</sub> in RC (<i>R</i> = -0.418, <i>p</i> < .05) and a positive one between EEE and LS<sub>BMD</sub> in MC were found (<i>R</i> = 0.605, <i>p</i> < .001). CaI, free testosterone and cortisol were unrelated to BMD. <b>Conclusion</b>: Both the RC and MC had lower LS<sub>BMD</sub> than C, whereas no difference was found between the two groups of cyclists. The factors associated with BMD are manifold, vary in relation to the measurement site and are likely different in RC, MC and C.</p>","PeriodicalId":54491,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2023.2242417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine (LSBMD) and the femoral neck (FBMD) in male road cyclists (RC n = 39), mountain cyclists (MC n = 30) and controls (C n = 27) and to determine the factors associated with BMD in the same group of participants. Methods: BMD, fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured using DXA. Calcium intake (Cal), exercise energy expenditure (EEE) and energy availability (EA) were assessed using self-reported questionnaires. Samples for circulating hormones were also obtained. VO2max was estimated by a cycloergometric test. Results: After adjustment for body mass, in cyclists LSBMD (RC 0.98 ± 0.12; MC 0.98 ± 0.10 g/cm2) was significantly lower than in C (1.11 ± 0.10; p < .001), while FBMD resulted in no significant difference in cyclists compared to C (p = 0.213). EA (kcal/FFM/day) was different in cyclists and in C (p < .05). In C, EEE and EA were positively associated with LSBMD (R = 0.561, R = 0.656, respectively, p < .01), whereas only EA was associated with FBMD (R = 0.554, p < .05); a positive association between EA and FBMD was found in MC (R = 0.464, p < .05). A negative relationship between VO2max and LSBMD in RC (R = -0.418, p < .05) and a positive one between EEE and LSBMD in MC were found (R = 0.605, p < .001). CaI, free testosterone and cortisol were unrelated to BMD. Conclusion: Both the RC and MC had lower LSBMD than C, whereas no difference was found between the two groups of cyclists. The factors associated with BMD are manifold, vary in relation to the measurement site and are likely different in RC, MC and C.

山地、公路自行车运动员和未受训对照组的骨矿物质密度:运动、饮食和荷尔蒙。
目的:本研究旨在比较男性公路自行车运动员(RC n = 39)、山地自行车运动员(MC n = 30)和对照组(C n = 27)的腰椎骨矿物质密度(BMD)和股骨颈骨矿物质密度(FBMD),并确定与同组参与者 BMD 相关的因素。方法使用 DXA 测量 BMD、脂肪量(FM)和无脂肪量(FFM)。钙摄入量(Cal)、运动能量消耗(EEE)和能量可用性(EA)通过自我报告问卷进行评估。此外,还采集了循环激素样本。VO2max 是通过 Cycloergometric 测试估算的。结果显示在对体重进行调整后,骑自行车者的 LSBMD(RC 0.98 ± 0.12;MC 0.98 ± 0.10 g/cm2)明显低于 C(1.11 ± 0.10;p BMD 结果显示,骑自行车者与 C 相比无明显差异(p = 0.213)。骑自行车者的 EA(千卡/FFM/天)与骑自行车者不同(p BMD(R = 0.561,R = 0.656,分别为 R = 0.561、R = 0.656,p BMD(R = 0.554,p BMD 在 MC 中发现(R = 0.464,p 2max),RC 中的 LSBMD(R = -0.418,p BMD 在 MC 中发现(R = 0.605,p 结论:RC和MC的LSBMD均低于C,而两组自行车运动员之间没有发现差异。与 BMD 相关的因素是多方面的,因测量地点而异,并且在 RC、MC 和 C 中可能有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport publishes research in the art and science of human movement that contributes significantly to the knowledge base of the field as new information, reviews, substantiation or contradiction of previous findings, development of theory, or as application of new or improved techniques. The goals of RQES are to provide a scholarly outlet for knowledge that: (a) contributes to the study of human movement, particularly its cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature; (b) impacts theory and practice regarding human movement; (c) stimulates research about human movement; and (d) provides theoretical reviews and tutorials related to the study of human movement. The editorial board, associate editors, and external reviewers assist the editor-in-chief. Qualified reviewers in the appropriate subdisciplines review manuscripts deemed suitable. Authors are usually advised of the decision on their papers within 75–90 days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信