Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared with those after cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nicola Marconi, Christopher Patrick Allen, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Abha Maheshwari
{"title":"Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared with those after cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.","authors":"Nicola Marconi,&nbsp;Christopher Patrick Allen,&nbsp;Siladitya Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Abha Maheshwari","doi":"10.1093/humupd/dmab042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extended embryo culture to blastocyst stage is widely used in IVF and is the default strategy in most clinics. The last decade has witnessed a growing interest in obstetric-perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer. Recent studies have challenged the conclusions of systematic reviews that associate risks of preterm birth (PTB) and large for gestational age (LGA) babies with blastocyst transfer. A higher proportion of blastocysts is transferred as frozen-thawed embryos, which may also have added implications.</p><p><strong>Objective and rationale: </strong>The aim of this study was to conduct an updated systematic review of the obstetric-perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies following blastocyst-stage transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles. Where deemed appropriate, data were combined in cumulative meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>Data sources from Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (1980-2020) were searched using combinations of relevant keywords. Searches had no language restrictions and were limited to human studies. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing obstetric-perinatal outcomes between singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage transfer and those after cleavage-stage transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles were sought. Two independent reviewers extracted data in 2 × 2 tables and assessed the methodological quality of the relevant studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme scoring. Cumulative meta-analyses were carried out with independent analysis of pregnancies after fresh and frozen embryo transfers, using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. If provided by included studies, adjusted effect sizes were combined in a sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>A total of 35 studies were included (n = 520 769 singleton pregnancies). Outcome data suggest singleton pregnancies following fresh blastocyst transfer were associated with higher risk of LGA (risk ratio (RR) 1.14; 95% CI 1.05-1.24) and very PTB (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.08-1.26) compared to fresh cleavage-stage transfer. Singleton pregnancies following frozen blastocyst transfer were associated with higher risks of LGA (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.08-1.27), PTB (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.24) and caesarean section (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.13) but lower risks of small for gestational age (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95) and perinatal mortality (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.58-0.86). Increased risks of LGA and PTB after frozen blastocyst transfer persisted in the sensitivity analysis, which also showed a significantly increased risk of PTB after fresh blastocyst transfer. Cumulative meta-analyses revealed consistency in prevalence and magnitude of risks for a number of years. Data on other perinatal outcomes are still evolving.</p><p><strong>Wider implications: </strong>While the available evidence is predominantly reassuring in the context of blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, observational data suggest that blastocyst transfer is associated with a higher risk of LGA. This holds true irrespective of fresh or frozen transfer. Meta-analysis of adjusted data showed an increased risk of PTB with fresh and frozen blastocyst transfer. However, the quality of available evidence ranges from low to very low. Although blastocyst-stage embryo transfer remains the default position in most centres, based on individual risk profile we may need to consider cleavage-stage embryo transfer in some to mitigate the risk of LGA/PTB.</p>","PeriodicalId":55045,"journal":{"name":"Human Reproduction Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Reproduction Update","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Extended embryo culture to blastocyst stage is widely used in IVF and is the default strategy in most clinics. The last decade has witnessed a growing interest in obstetric-perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer. Recent studies have challenged the conclusions of systematic reviews that associate risks of preterm birth (PTB) and large for gestational age (LGA) babies with blastocyst transfer. A higher proportion of blastocysts is transferred as frozen-thawed embryos, which may also have added implications.

Objective and rationale: The aim of this study was to conduct an updated systematic review of the obstetric-perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies following blastocyst-stage transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles. Where deemed appropriate, data were combined in cumulative meta-analyses.

Search methods: Data sources from Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (1980-2020) were searched using combinations of relevant keywords. Searches had no language restrictions and were limited to human studies. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing obstetric-perinatal outcomes between singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage transfer and those after cleavage-stage transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles were sought. Two independent reviewers extracted data in 2 × 2 tables and assessed the methodological quality of the relevant studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme scoring. Cumulative meta-analyses were carried out with independent analysis of pregnancies after fresh and frozen embryo transfers, using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. If provided by included studies, adjusted effect sizes were combined in a sensitivity analysis.

Outcomes: A total of 35 studies were included (n = 520 769 singleton pregnancies). Outcome data suggest singleton pregnancies following fresh blastocyst transfer were associated with higher risk of LGA (risk ratio (RR) 1.14; 95% CI 1.05-1.24) and very PTB (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.08-1.26) compared to fresh cleavage-stage transfer. Singleton pregnancies following frozen blastocyst transfer were associated with higher risks of LGA (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.08-1.27), PTB (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.24) and caesarean section (RR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.13) but lower risks of small for gestational age (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95) and perinatal mortality (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.58-0.86). Increased risks of LGA and PTB after frozen blastocyst transfer persisted in the sensitivity analysis, which also showed a significantly increased risk of PTB after fresh blastocyst transfer. Cumulative meta-analyses revealed consistency in prevalence and magnitude of risks for a number of years. Data on other perinatal outcomes are still evolving.

Wider implications: While the available evidence is predominantly reassuring in the context of blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, observational data suggest that blastocyst transfer is associated with a higher risk of LGA. This holds true irrespective of fresh or frozen transfer. Meta-analysis of adjusted data showed an increased risk of PTB with fresh and frozen blastocyst transfer. However, the quality of available evidence ranges from low to very low. Although blastocyst-stage embryo transfer remains the default position in most centres, based on individual risk profile we may need to consider cleavage-stage embryo transfer in some to mitigate the risk of LGA/PTB.

囊胚期胚胎移植与卵裂期胚胎移植后单胎妊娠的产科和围产期结局:一项系统综述和累积荟萃分析
背景:延长胚胎培养至囊胚期广泛应用于体外受精,是大多数诊所的默认策略。在过去的十年里,人们对囊胚移植后的产科围产期结果越来越感兴趣。最近的研究挑战了系统综述的结论,即早产(PTB)和大胎龄(LGA)婴儿的风险与囊胚移植有关。更高比例的囊胚作为冻融胚胎被转移,这也可能有额外的含义。目的和理由:本研究的目的是对IVF/ICSI周期中囊胚期移植与卵裂期移植后单胎妊娠的产科-围产期结局进行最新的系统回顾。在认为合适的情况下,将数据合并为累积荟萃分析。检索方法:结合相关关键词检索Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials和国际临床试验注册平台(International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ICTRP) 1980-2020年的数据来源。搜索没有语言限制,仅限于人类研究。观察性研究和随机对照试验比较了IVF/ICSI周期中囊胚期移植后单胎妊娠和卵裂期移植后单胎妊娠的产科-围产期结局。两名独立审稿人从2 × 2表格中提取数据,并使用关键评估技能计划评分评估相关研究的方法学质量。使用综合荟萃分析软件对新鲜和冷冻胚胎移植后的妊娠进行累积荟萃分析。如果纳入的研究提供,调整后的效应量在敏感性分析中合并。结果:共纳入35项研究(n = 520 769例单胎妊娠)。结果数据显示,新鲜囊胚移植后单胎妊娠与LGA的高风险相关(风险比(RR) 1.14;95% CI 1.05-1.24)和very PTB (RR 1.17;95% CI 1.08-1.26)。冷冻囊胚移植后单胎妊娠与LGA风险升高相关(RR 1.17;95% ci 1.08-1.27),肺结核(rr 1.13;95% CI 1.03-1.24)和剖宫产(RR 1.08;95% CI 1.03-1.13),但小于胎龄(RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95)和围产期死亡率(RR 0.70;95% ci 0.58-0.86)。敏感性分析显示,冷冻囊胚移植后LGA和PTB的风险持续增加,新鲜囊胚移植后PTB的风险也显著增加。累积的荟萃分析揭示了多年来患病率和风险程度的一致性。关于其他围产期结局的数据仍在不断发展。更广泛的影响:虽然现有的证据主要是在囊胚期胚胎移植的背景下令人放心,但观察数据表明囊胚移植与LGA的高风险相关。无论是新鲜的还是冷冻的转移都是如此。调整后数据的荟萃分析显示,新鲜和冷冻囊胚移植增加了PTB的风险。然而,现有证据的质量从低到极低不等。尽管囊胚期胚胎移植仍然是大多数中心的默认位置,但基于个体风险情况,我们可能需要考虑在一些中心进行卵裂期胚胎移植以降低LGA/PTB的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Reproduction Update
Human Reproduction Update 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
28.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction Update is the leading journal in its field, boasting a Journal Impact FactorTM of 13.3 and ranked first in Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (Source: Journal Citation ReportsTM from Clarivate, 2023). It specializes in publishing comprehensive and systematic review articles covering various aspects of human reproductive physiology and medicine. The journal prioritizes basic, transitional, and clinical topics related to reproduction, encompassing areas such as andrology, embryology, infertility, gynaecology, pregnancy, reproductive endocrinology, reproductive epidemiology, reproductive genetics, reproductive immunology, and reproductive oncology. Human Reproduction Update is published on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), maintaining the highest scientific and editorial standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信