Demonstration Project: Transitioning a Research Network to New Single IRB Platforms

Q2 Social Sciences
Jeri S. Burr, Ann Johnson, Annie Risenmay, Stephanie Bisping, Emily S. Serdoz, Whit Coleman, Katherine A. Sward, Erin Rothwell, J. Michael Dean
{"title":"Demonstration Project: Transitioning a Research Network to New Single IRB Platforms","authors":"Jeri S. Burr,&nbsp;Ann Johnson,&nbsp;Annie Risenmay,&nbsp;Stephanie Bisping,&nbsp;Emily S. Serdoz,&nbsp;Whit Coleman,&nbsp;Katherine A. Sward,&nbsp;Erin Rothwell,&nbsp;J. Michael Dean","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Since the 2016 National Institutes of Health (NIH) mandate to use a single IRB (sIRB) in multicenter research, institutions have struggled to operationalize the process. In this demonstration project, the University of Utah Trial Innovation Center assisted the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network to transition from using individually negotiated reliance agreements and paper-based documentation to a new sIRB master agreement and an informatics platform to capture reliance documentation. Lessons learned that can guide other academic institutions and IRBs as they operationalize sIRBs included the need for sites to understand what type of engagement or reliance is required and their need to understand the difference between reliance and activation. Requirements around local review remain poorly understood. Further research is needed to determine approaches that can achieve the NIH vision of reviews becoming more efficient and improving study start-up times, relieving administrative burden while advancing human research protections.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 6","pages":"32-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10328109/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since the 2016 National Institutes of Health (NIH) mandate to use a single IRB (sIRB) in multicenter research, institutions have struggled to operationalize the process. In this demonstration project, the University of Utah Trial Innovation Center assisted the Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network to transition from using individually negotiated reliance agreements and paper-based documentation to a new sIRB master agreement and an informatics platform to capture reliance documentation. Lessons learned that can guide other academic institutions and IRBs as they operationalize sIRBs included the need for sites to understand what type of engagement or reliance is required and their need to understand the difference between reliance and activation. Requirements around local review remain poorly understood. Further research is needed to determine approaches that can achieve the NIH vision of reviews becoming more efficient and improving study start-up times, relieving administrative burden while advancing human research protections.

示范项目:将研究网络过渡到新的单一IRB平台。
自2016年美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)授权在多中心研究中使用单一IRB(sIRB)以来,各机构一直在努力实施这一过程。在该示范项目中,犹他大学试验创新中心协助协作儿科重症监护研究网络从使用单独协商的依赖协议和纸质文件过渡到新的sIRB主协议和获取依赖文件的信息学平台。可以指导其他学术机构和IRB操作sIRB的经验教训包括,网站需要了解需要什么类型的参与或依赖,以及他们需要了解依赖和激活之间的区别。对地方审查的要求仍知之甚少。需要进一步的研究来确定能够实现NIH愿景的方法,即提高审查效率,缩短研究启动时间,减轻行政负担,同时推进人类研究保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信