An Approach to Reviewing Local Context for Exception from Informed Consent Trials Using a Single IRB

Q2 Social Sciences
Ann R. Johnson, Lisa M. Rigtrup, John VanBuren, Erin Rothwell, J. Michael Dean
{"title":"An Approach to Reviewing Local Context for Exception from Informed Consent Trials Using a Single IRB","authors":"Ann R. Johnson,&nbsp;Lisa M. Rigtrup,&nbsp;John VanBuren,&nbsp;Erin Rothwell,&nbsp;J. Michael Dean","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the context of emergency research, researchers can ask the institutional review board (IRB) to waive the regulatory requirement that individuals provide informed consent when enrolling in research studies. A requirement of the waiver of informed consent is that the reviewing IRB must review and approve a community consultation and public disclosure plan. It is critical that an IRB serving as the single IRB (sIRB) for multisite research be thoroughly versed in the local context concerns for each participating site to determine whether the site's community is being adequately consulted about the research in which individuals will be enrolled under an exception to the informed consent requirement. We designed an sIRB review model for evaluating site-specific community consultation plans that included a local evaluation and feedback step, and we piloted the model with a four-site, pediatric exception from informed consent (EFIC) clinical trial. We identified three key roles for the model: the sIRB, the investigators, and the representative of the institution's human research protection program (HRPP). We successfully collected the information and local input needed to evaluate each site's community consultation plan and applied the information to a thorough IRB review, despite the geographic distance between the study site and the sIRB.</p>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 6","pages":"42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the context of emergency research, researchers can ask the institutional review board (IRB) to waive the regulatory requirement that individuals provide informed consent when enrolling in research studies. A requirement of the waiver of informed consent is that the reviewing IRB must review and approve a community consultation and public disclosure plan. It is critical that an IRB serving as the single IRB (sIRB) for multisite research be thoroughly versed in the local context concerns for each participating site to determine whether the site's community is being adequately consulted about the research in which individuals will be enrolled under an exception to the informed consent requirement. We designed an sIRB review model for evaluating site-specific community consultation plans that included a local evaluation and feedback step, and we piloted the model with a four-site, pediatric exception from informed consent (EFIC) clinical trial. We identified three key roles for the model: the sIRB, the investigators, and the representative of the institution's human research protection program (HRPP). We successfully collected the information and local input needed to evaluate each site's community consultation plan and applied the information to a thorough IRB review, despite the geographic distance between the study site and the sIRB.

Abstract Image

使用单一IRB审查知情同意试验例外的本地背景的方法
在紧急研究的背景下,研究人员可以要求机构审查委员会(IRB)放弃个人在参加研究时提供知情同意的监管要求。豁免知情同意的一项要求是,审查委员会必须审查并批准社区咨询和公众披露计划。至关重要的是,作为多站点研究的单一IRB (sIRB)的IRB必须彻底了解每个参与站点的当地背景问题,以确定该站点的社区是否充分咨询了研究,个人将在知情同意要求的例外情况下被招募。我们设计了一个sIRB评估模型,用于评估特定地点的社区咨询计划,其中包括当地评估和反馈步骤,我们在一个四地点的儿科知情同意例外(EFIC)临床试验中对该模型进行了试点。我们确定了该模型的三个关键角色:sIRB、研究者和该机构人类研究保护计划(HRPP)的代表。我们成功地收集了评估每个站点的社区咨询计划所需的信息和本地输入,并将这些信息应用于彻底的IRB审查,尽管研究站点与sIRB之间存在地理距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信