Enhancing the Efficiency of the Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) Quality and Compliance through Automation.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Shannon Link, Adam Kammler, Ritu Gupta, Mahendra Hembade, Retesh Kumar, Vinu George
{"title":"Enhancing the Efficiency of the Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) Quality and Compliance through Automation.","authors":"Shannon Link, Adam Kammler, Ritu Gupta, Mahendra Hembade, Retesh Kumar, Vinu George","doi":"10.2174/1574886318666230801162002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past few years, major inspection findings have been identified in the \"management of adverse reactions\" that may be due to increasing workload in pharmaceutical organizations impacting the correctness of information in individual case safety reports (ICSRs). Although retrospective quality check (Retro-QC) and late submission analyses are important steps in ensuring ICSR quality, their manual application poses several challenges that can be overcome through automation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve the efficiency of the Retro-QC analysis and late submission analysis using a computer-operated tool called Compliance and Metrics Management (CMM) tool, and to measure the tool's effectiveness in terms of productivity, time, and cost savings by comparing against the manual process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Time savings were calculated by measuring the difference in time taken during the manual process versus the automated process. Cost savings were measured in terms of hourly remuneration for the time saved. Productivity was calculated as the difference between the number of cases handled in the manual versus automated process. Thus, the overall efficiency was measured in terms of time and cost savings along with increased productivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Automation resulted in time savings of 49% and cost savings of 43% for Retro-QC analysis, and the productivity level increased by 67%. For late submission analysis, the CMM tool resulted in time savings of 88% and cost savings of 87%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMM tool enhanced the efficiency of both Retro-QC and late submission analyses by increasing productivity along with time and cost savings. It also reduced the number of errors, thereby enhancing the accuracy of the process and overall compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":"255-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574886318666230801162002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the past few years, major inspection findings have been identified in the "management of adverse reactions" that may be due to increasing workload in pharmaceutical organizations impacting the correctness of information in individual case safety reports (ICSRs). Although retrospective quality check (Retro-QC) and late submission analyses are important steps in ensuring ICSR quality, their manual application poses several challenges that can be overcome through automation.

Objectives: To improve the efficiency of the Retro-QC analysis and late submission analysis using a computer-operated tool called Compliance and Metrics Management (CMM) tool, and to measure the tool's effectiveness in terms of productivity, time, and cost savings by comparing against the manual process.

Methods: Time savings were calculated by measuring the difference in time taken during the manual process versus the automated process. Cost savings were measured in terms of hourly remuneration for the time saved. Productivity was calculated as the difference between the number of cases handled in the manual versus automated process. Thus, the overall efficiency was measured in terms of time and cost savings along with increased productivity.

Results: Automation resulted in time savings of 49% and cost savings of 43% for Retro-QC analysis, and the productivity level increased by 67%. For late submission analysis, the CMM tool resulted in time savings of 88% and cost savings of 87%.

Conclusion: CMM tool enhanced the efficiency of both Retro-QC and late submission analyses by increasing productivity along with time and cost savings. It also reduced the number of errors, thereby enhancing the accuracy of the process and overall compliance.

通过自动化提高个案安全报告 (ICSR) 质量和合规性的效率。
背景:在过去几年中,在 "不良反应管理 "方面发现了一些重大检查结果,其原因可能是制药机构的工作量不断增加,影响了个案安全报告(ICSR)中信息的正确性。虽然追溯质量检查(Retro-QC)和逾期提交分析是确保个体安全报告质量的重要步骤,但其人工应用带来了一些挑战,可以通过自动化加以克服:目的:使用一种名为 "合规性和指标管理(CMM)工具 "的计算机操作工具来提高回溯质量检查分析和延迟提交分析的效率,并通过与人工流程进行比较来衡量该工具在生产率、时间和成本节约方面的有效性:方法:通过测量人工流程与自动化流程的时间差,计算所节省的时间。节省的成本按节省时间的小时报酬计算。生产率的计算方法是人工与自动化流程处理的案件数量之差。因此,总体效率是以节省的时间和成本以及提高的生产率来衡量的:结果:自动化后,回溯质量控制分析节省了 49% 的时间和 43% 的成本,生产率提高了 67%。在迟交分析方面,CMM 工具节省了 88% 的时间和 87% 的成本:结论:CMM 工具提高了回溯质量控制和延迟提交分析的效率,在节省时间和成本的同时还提高了生产率。它还减少了错误数量,从而提高了流程的准确性和整体合规性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current drug safety
Current drug safety PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Current Drug Safety publishes frontier articles on all the latest advances on drug safety. The journal aims to publish the highest quality research articles, reviews and case reports in the field. Topics covered include: adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes, management of adverse effects, pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology of new and existing drugs, post-marketing surveillance. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信