Magnetic resonance imaging - evaluation of mesorectal lymphadenopathy in patients with rectal cancer.

Q4 Medicine
P Ihnát, V Židlík, P Hanzlíková, P Koscielnik, J Škarda
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging - evaluation of mesorectal lymphadenopathy in patients with rectal cancer.","authors":"P Ihnát,&nbsp;V Židlík,&nbsp;P Hanzlíková,&nbsp;P Koscielnik,&nbsp;J Škarda","doi":"10.33699/PIS.2023.102.5.194-198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multidisciplinary management of patients with rectal cancer presents a gold standard of care; neoadjuvant therapy indications are based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) description of the local stage of the carcinoma. Although the accuracy of MRI-based assessment of cancer depth of invasion is satisfactory, its accuracy in the assessment of mesorectal lymphadenopathy is very questionable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, single-centre, cohort study focused on the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of mesorectal lymph nodes (LN). MRI findings of each patient were compared with detailed histopathological examination of rectal specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients with rectal cancer, undergoing rectal resection with total mesorectal excision were enrolled in the study. MRI assessment of the T-stage was correct in 22 of the 40 study patients (55.0%). T-stage overstaging was noted in 14 (35.0%), and understaging in 4 (10.0%) study patients. According to preoperative MRI (using Horvat's criteria), there were 50 suspicious/malignant lymph nodes. Only 13 of these 50 LNs (26.0%) were proved malignant on histopathology examination. In total, our study group included 18 patients with suspicious/positive LNs (according to preoperative MRI) who were classified as cN+. MRI diagnosis of malignant lymphadenopathy was correct in only 33.3% of these patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI shows very low accuracy in the evaluation of mesorectal lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer. Therefore neoadjuvant therapy should be offered particularly with respect to MRI description of the depth of carcinoma invasion (T-stage and relationship to fascia propria of the rectum).</p>","PeriodicalId":52413,"journal":{"name":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","volume":"102 5","pages":"194-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2023.102.5.194-198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multidisciplinary management of patients with rectal cancer presents a gold standard of care; neoadjuvant therapy indications are based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) description of the local stage of the carcinoma. Although the accuracy of MRI-based assessment of cancer depth of invasion is satisfactory, its accuracy in the assessment of mesorectal lymphadenopathy is very questionable.

Methods: This was a prospective, single-centre, cohort study focused on the accuracy of preoperative MRI in the assessment of mesorectal lymph nodes (LN). MRI findings of each patient were compared with detailed histopathological examination of rectal specimens.

Results: Forty patients with rectal cancer, undergoing rectal resection with total mesorectal excision were enrolled in the study. MRI assessment of the T-stage was correct in 22 of the 40 study patients (55.0%). T-stage overstaging was noted in 14 (35.0%), and understaging in 4 (10.0%) study patients. According to preoperative MRI (using Horvat's criteria), there were 50 suspicious/malignant lymph nodes. Only 13 of these 50 LNs (26.0%) were proved malignant on histopathology examination. In total, our study group included 18 patients with suspicious/positive LNs (according to preoperative MRI) who were classified as cN+. MRI diagnosis of malignant lymphadenopathy was correct in only 33.3% of these patients.

Conclusion: MRI shows very low accuracy in the evaluation of mesorectal lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer. Therefore neoadjuvant therapy should be offered particularly with respect to MRI description of the depth of carcinoma invasion (T-stage and relationship to fascia propria of the rectum).

磁共振成像对直肠癌患者肠系膜淋巴结病变的评价。
介绍:多学科管理的患者直肠癌提出了护理的黄金标准;新辅助治疗的适应症是基于磁共振成像(MRI)对局部肿瘤分期的描述。虽然基于mri的肿瘤浸润深度评估的准确性是令人满意的,但其在评估肠系膜淋巴结病的准确性是非常值得怀疑的。方法:这是一项前瞻性、单中心、队列研究,重点关注术前MRI评估直肠系膜淋巴结(LN)的准确性。将每位患者的MRI结果与直肠标本的详细组织病理学检查进行比较。结果:40例直肠癌患者接受直肠全肠系膜切除术。40例患者中有22例(55.0%)的t期MRI评估是正确的。14例(35.0%)患者出现t期过分期,4例(10.0%)患者出现t期过分期。术前MRI检查(采用Horvat标准),可疑/恶性淋巴结50个。50例ln中仅有13例(26.0%)经组织病理学检查为恶性。我们的研究组共纳入18例疑似/阳性LNs患者(根据术前MRI),并将其分类为cN+。恶性淋巴结病的MRI诊断正确率仅为33.3%。结论:MRI对直肠癌患者直肠系膜淋巴结的评价准确率很低。因此,应该提供新的辅助治疗,特别是关于肿瘤浸润深度的MRI描述(t分期和与直肠固有筋膜的关系)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rozhledy v Chirurgii
Rozhledy v Chirurgii Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信