Factors Associated with Attrition in a Longitudinal Cohort of Older Adults in the Community.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Noah Katsuno, Pei Z Li, Jean Bourbeau, Shawn Aaron, Francois Maltais, Paul Hernandez, Kenneth R Chapman, Brandie Walker, Darcy D Marciniuk, Denis D ODonnell, Don D Sin, James C Hogg, Michael Cheng, Jeremy Road, Wan C Tan
{"title":"Factors Associated with Attrition in a Longitudinal Cohort of Older Adults in the Community.","authors":"Noah Katsuno,&nbsp;Pei Z Li,&nbsp;Jean Bourbeau,&nbsp;Shawn Aaron,&nbsp;Francois Maltais,&nbsp;Paul Hernandez,&nbsp;Kenneth R Chapman,&nbsp;Brandie Walker,&nbsp;Darcy D Marciniuk,&nbsp;Denis D ODonnell,&nbsp;Don D Sin,&nbsp;James C Hogg,&nbsp;Michael Cheng,&nbsp;Jeremy Road,&nbsp;Wan C Tan","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retaining participants in longitudinal studies increases their power. We undertook this study in a population-based longitudinal cohort of adults with COPD to determine the factors associated with increased cohort attrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the longitudinal population-based Canadian Cohort of Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study, 1561 adults > 40 years old were randomly recruited from 9 urban sites. Participants completed in-person visits at 18-month intervals and also were followed up every 3 months over the phone or by email. The cohort retention for the study and the reasons for attrition were analyzed. Hazard ratios and robust standard errors were calculated using Cox regression methods to explore the associations between participants who remained in the study and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up (years) of the study is 9.0 years. The overall mean retention was 77%. Reasons for attrition (23%) were: dropout by participant (39%), loss of contact (27%), investigator-initiated withdrawal (15%), deaths (9%), serious disease (9%), and relocation (2%). Factors independently associated with attrition were lower educational attainment, higher pack-year tobacco consumption, diagnosed cardiovascular disease, and a higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score: adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.43(1.11, 1.85); 1.01(1.00, 1.01); 1.44(1.13, 1.83); 1.06(1.02, 1.10) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identification and awareness of risk factors for attrition could direct targeted retention strategies in longitudinal studies. Moreover, the identification of patient characteristics associated with study dropout could address any potential bias introduced by differential dropouts.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10392873/pdf/JCOPDF-10-178.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2022.0380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Retaining participants in longitudinal studies increases their power. We undertook this study in a population-based longitudinal cohort of adults with COPD to determine the factors associated with increased cohort attrition.

Methods: In the longitudinal population-based Canadian Cohort of Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study, 1561 adults > 40 years old were randomly recruited from 9 urban sites. Participants completed in-person visits at 18-month intervals and also were followed up every 3 months over the phone or by email. The cohort retention for the study and the reasons for attrition were analyzed. Hazard ratios and robust standard errors were calculated using Cox regression methods to explore the associations between participants who remained in the study and those who did not.

Results: The median follow-up (years) of the study is 9.0 years. The overall mean retention was 77%. Reasons for attrition (23%) were: dropout by participant (39%), loss of contact (27%), investigator-initiated withdrawal (15%), deaths (9%), serious disease (9%), and relocation (2%). Factors independently associated with attrition were lower educational attainment, higher pack-year tobacco consumption, diagnosed cardiovascular disease, and a higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score: adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.43(1.11, 1.85); 1.01(1.00, 1.01); 1.44(1.13, 1.83); 1.06(1.02, 1.10) respectively.

Conclusions: Identification and awareness of risk factors for attrition could direct targeted retention strategies in longitudinal studies. Moreover, the identification of patient characteristics associated with study dropout could address any potential bias introduced by differential dropouts.

社区老年人纵向队列中与磨耗相关的因素。
在纵向研究中保留参与者增加了他们的力量。我们对COPD成人患者进行了一项以人群为基础的纵向队列研究,以确定与队列流失增加相关的因素。方法:在以人群为基础的加拿大阻塞性肺病纵向队列(CanCOLD)研究中,从9个城市随机招募1561名> 40岁的成年人。参与者每隔18个月完成一次亲自访问,并每3个月通过电话或电子邮件进行随访。分析了本研究的队列保留率和人员流失的原因。使用Cox回归方法计算风险比和稳健标准误差,以探索留在研究中的参与者与未留在研究中的参与者之间的关联。结果:研究的中位随访(年)为9.0年。总体平均留存率为77%。流失(23%)的原因是:参与者退出(39%)、失去联系(27%)、研究者主动退出(15%)、死亡(9%)、严重疾病(9%)和搬迁(2%)。与减量独立相关的因素为受教育程度较低、每包烟草年消费量较高、诊断出心血管疾病、医院焦虑抑郁量表得分较高:调整后的风险比(95%置信区间)为1.43(1.11,1.85);1.01 (1.00, 1.01);1.44 (1.13, 1.83);分别为1.06(1.02,1.10)。结论:在纵向研究中,对员工流失风险因素的识别和认识可以指导有针对性的挽留策略。此外,确定与研究退出相关的患者特征可以解决因差异退出而引入的任何潜在偏倚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信