An Insurance Value Modeling Approach That Captures the Wider Value of a Novel Antimicrobial to Health Systems, Patients, and the Population.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2023-07-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.36469/001c.75206
Mei S Chan, Richard Holloway, Robert King, Rosie Polya, Rebecca Sloan, Jack C Kowalik, Tom Ashfield, Luke S P Moore, Thomas Porter, Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard
{"title":"An Insurance Value Modeling Approach That Captures the Wider Value of a Novel Antimicrobial to Health Systems, Patients, and the Population.","authors":"Mei S Chan, Richard Holloway, Robert King, Rosie Polya, Rebecca Sloan, Jack C Kowalik, Tom Ashfield, Luke S P Moore, Thomas Porter, Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard","doi":"10.36469/001c.75206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Traditional health economic evaluations of antimicrobials currently underestimate their value to wider society. They can be supplemented by additional value elements including insurance value, which captures the value of an antimicrobial in preventing or mitigating impacts of adverse risk events. Despite being commonplace in other sectors, constituents of the impacts and approaches for estimating insurance value have not been investigated. <b>Objectives:</b> This study assessed the insurance value of a novel gram-negative antimicrobial from operational healthcare, wider population health, productivity, and informal care perspectives. <b>Methods:</b> A novel mixed-methods approach was used to model insurance value in the United Kingdom: (1) literature review and multidisciplinary expert workshops to identify risk events for 4 relevant scenarios: ward closures, unavoidable shortage of conventional antimicrobials, viral respiratory pandemics, and catastrophic antimicrobial resistance (AMR); (2) parameterizing mitigable costs and frequencies of risk events across perspectives and scenarios; (3) estimating insurance value through a Monte Carlo simulation model for extreme events and a dynamic disease transmission model. <b>Results:</b> The mean insurance value across all scenarios and perspectives over 10 years in the UK was £718 million, should AMR remain unchanged, where only £134 million related to operational healthcare costs. It would be 50%-70% higher if AMR steadily increased or if a more risk-averse view (1-in-10 year downside) of future events is taken. <b>Discussion:</b> The overall insurance value if AMR remains at current levels (a conservative projection), is over 5 times greater than insurance value from just the operational healthcare costs perspective, traditionally the sole perspective used in health budgeting. Insurance value was generally larger for nationwide or universal (catastrophic AMR, pandemic, and conventional antimicrobial shortages) rather than localized (ward closure) scenarios, across perspectives. Components of this insurance value match previously published estimates of operational costs and mortality impacts. <b>Conclusions:</b> Insurance value of novel antimicrobials can be systematically modeled and substantially augments their traditional health economic value in normal circumstances. These approaches are generalizable to similar health interventions and form a framework for health systems and governments to capture broader value in health technology assessments, improve healthcare access, and increase resilience by planning for adverse scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10359113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.75206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional health economic evaluations of antimicrobials currently underestimate their value to wider society. They can be supplemented by additional value elements including insurance value, which captures the value of an antimicrobial in preventing or mitigating impacts of adverse risk events. Despite being commonplace in other sectors, constituents of the impacts and approaches for estimating insurance value have not been investigated. Objectives: This study assessed the insurance value of a novel gram-negative antimicrobial from operational healthcare, wider population health, productivity, and informal care perspectives. Methods: A novel mixed-methods approach was used to model insurance value in the United Kingdom: (1) literature review and multidisciplinary expert workshops to identify risk events for 4 relevant scenarios: ward closures, unavoidable shortage of conventional antimicrobials, viral respiratory pandemics, and catastrophic antimicrobial resistance (AMR); (2) parameterizing mitigable costs and frequencies of risk events across perspectives and scenarios; (3) estimating insurance value through a Monte Carlo simulation model for extreme events and a dynamic disease transmission model. Results: The mean insurance value across all scenarios and perspectives over 10 years in the UK was £718 million, should AMR remain unchanged, where only £134 million related to operational healthcare costs. It would be 50%-70% higher if AMR steadily increased or if a more risk-averse view (1-in-10 year downside) of future events is taken. Discussion: The overall insurance value if AMR remains at current levels (a conservative projection), is over 5 times greater than insurance value from just the operational healthcare costs perspective, traditionally the sole perspective used in health budgeting. Insurance value was generally larger for nationwide or universal (catastrophic AMR, pandemic, and conventional antimicrobial shortages) rather than localized (ward closure) scenarios, across perspectives. Components of this insurance value match previously published estimates of operational costs and mortality impacts. Conclusions: Insurance value of novel antimicrobials can be systematically modeled and substantially augments their traditional health economic value in normal circumstances. These approaches are generalizable to similar health interventions and form a framework for health systems and governments to capture broader value in health technology assessments, improve healthcare access, and increase resilience by planning for adverse scenarios.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种保险价值建模方法,捕捉新型抗菌药物对卫生系统、患者和人群的更广泛价值。
背景:传统的抗微生物药物的健康经济评估目前低估了它们对更广泛社会的价值。它们可以由额外的价值元素来补充,包括保险价值,保险价值体现了抗菌药物在预防或减轻不良风险事件影响方面的价值。尽管在其他行业很常见,但影响的组成部分和估计保险价值的方法尚未得到调查。目的:本研究从操作医疗、更广泛的人群健康、生产力和非正规护理的角度评估了一种新型革兰氏阴性抗菌药物的保险价值。方法:采用一种新的混合方法对英国的保险价值进行建模:(1)文献综述和多学科专家研讨会,以确定4种相关情况的风险事件:病房关闭、常规抗菌药物不可避免的短缺、病毒性呼吸道大流行病和灾难性抗微生物耐药性(AMR);(2) 参数化不同视角和情景下的可缓解成本和风险事件频率;(3) 通过极端事件的蒙特卡罗模拟模型和动态疾病传播模型来估计保险价值。结果:如果AMR保持不变,英国10年内所有情景和视角的平均保险价值为7.18亿英镑,其中只有1.34亿英镑与运营医疗成本有关。如果AMR稳步上升,或者对未来事件采取更规避风险的观点(10年一遇的下行趋势),则会高出50%-70%。讨论:如果AMR保持在当前水平(保守预测),仅从运营医疗成本角度来看,整体保险价值是保险价值的5倍以上,而运营医疗成本是传统上医疗预算中唯一使用的角度。从各个角度来看,全国性或普遍性(灾难性AMR、大流行和常规抗菌药物短缺)的保险价值通常大于局部(病房关闭)情况。该保险价值的组成部分与之前公布的运营成本和死亡率影响的估计值相匹配。结论:新型抗菌药物的保险价值可以系统地建模,并在正常情况下大大提高其传统的健康经济价值。这些方法可推广到类似的卫生干预措施中,并为卫生系统和政府提供了一个框架,以在卫生技术评估中获得更广泛的价值,改善医疗服务的可及性,并通过规划不利情况来提高抵御能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信