Differences and Disparities in Ageism Affecting Older US Adults: A Review.

3区 医学
Current Epidemiology Reports Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-29 DOI:10.1007/s40471-022-00316-6
Julie Ober Allen, Lauren K Elias, Josephine C Greenwood
{"title":"Differences and Disparities in Ageism Affecting Older US Adults: A Review.","authors":"Julie Ober Allen, Lauren K Elias, Josephine C Greenwood","doi":"10.1007/s40471-022-00316-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review summarizes findings from quantitative research studies published between 2010 and 2022 providing insight on sociodemographic differences and disparities in ageism among US adults ages 50 and older.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Across 21 studies, disparities in ageism were more consistently found such that those who were older (57% of studies), with less education (64%), and of lower socioeconomic status (100%) reported more ageism than their counterparts. Amount of ageism did not differ by sex in the majority (71%) of studies. Findings regarding race/ethnicity were mixed. Other possible differences in ageism, assessed in a small number of studies, were patterned by employment characteristics, geographic residence, religiosity, and political affiliation but not by marital or employment status.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Given that ageism is both common and associated with poor health outcomes, identifying disproportionately affected segments of the older adult population is a necessary prerequisite for developing targeted interventions to reduce negative outcomes linked to ageism and associated health disparities. Evidence within this review suggests that the patterning of ageism may deviate from that typically documented for other social and structural disadvantages. Some groups traditionally considered to be socially marginalized were found to report more ageism while others did not.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10358738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-022-00316-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review summarizes findings from quantitative research studies published between 2010 and 2022 providing insight on sociodemographic differences and disparities in ageism among US adults ages 50 and older.

Findings: Across 21 studies, disparities in ageism were more consistently found such that those who were older (57% of studies), with less education (64%), and of lower socioeconomic status (100%) reported more ageism than their counterparts. Amount of ageism did not differ by sex in the majority (71%) of studies. Findings regarding race/ethnicity were mixed. Other possible differences in ageism, assessed in a small number of studies, were patterned by employment characteristics, geographic residence, religiosity, and political affiliation but not by marital or employment status.

Summary: Given that ageism is both common and associated with poor health outcomes, identifying disproportionately affected segments of the older adult population is a necessary prerequisite for developing targeted interventions to reduce negative outcomes linked to ageism and associated health disparities. Evidence within this review suggests that the patterning of ageism may deviate from that typically documented for other social and structural disadvantages. Some groups traditionally considered to be socially marginalized were found to report more ageism while others did not.

Abstract Image

影响美国老年人的老龄歧视的差异和差距:综述。
综述目的:本综述总结了 2010 年至 2022 年间发表的定量研究结果,这些研究深入分析了美国 50 岁及以上成年人的社会人口差异和老龄歧视差异:在 21 项研究中,老龄歧视的差异被更一致地发现,如年龄较大(57% 的研究)、教育程度较低(64%)和社会经济地位较低(100%)的人比他们的同龄人报告了更多的老龄歧视。在大多数研究中(71%),老龄歧视的程度没有性别差异。有关种族/民族的研究结果不一。小结:鉴于老龄歧视既普遍又与不良的健康后果相关,识别老年人口中受影响过大的群体是制定有针对性的干预措施以减少与老龄歧视和相关健康差异有关的不良后果的必要前提。本综述中的证据表明,老龄歧视的模式可能不同于其他社会和结构性不利因素的典型记录。一些传统上被认为是社会边缘化的群体被发现报告了更多的老龄歧视,而其他群体则没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信