Texture term usage and hedonic ratings in two age-diverse cohorts of Americans

IF 2.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kai Kai Ma, Aarthi Madhavan, Nicole M. Etter, Helene Hopfer, John E. Hayes
{"title":"Texture term usage and hedonic ratings in two age-diverse cohorts of Americans","authors":"Kai Kai Ma,&nbsp;Aarthi Madhavan,&nbsp;Nicole M. Etter,&nbsp;Helene Hopfer,&nbsp;John E. Hayes","doi":"10.1111/jtxs.12791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the use of food texture terms by adults in the northeastern United States. The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of food texture on food liking and texture term usage among age groups via two complementary online surveys that differed in the specific task given to participants. Survey 1 gathered common food items associated with 25 texture terms using open-ended questions from 345 participants (45% men, 55% women; age range = 20–79 years); it also collected liking scores for foods with these textures. Next, a new group of participants (<i>n</i> = 349, 46% men, 54% women; age range = 20–79 years) completed Survey 2, which asked them to match up to three texture terms to 32 different foods drawn from Survey 1, using a provided list of 35 texture terms. “Tough,” “Chalky,” and “Rubbery” had a negative impact on food liking scores while “Tender,” “Juicy,” and “Crispy” were associated with higher mean food liking scores. “Soft,” “Crunchy,” “Crispy,” “Juicy,” and “Greasy” were commonly used texture terms regardless of age. Within those aged 50–79 years, “Smooth,” “Tender,” “Crunchy,” “Soft,” “Moist,” “Crispy,” and “Creamy” were used more often while “Chalky,” “Rough,” “Mealy,” “Foamy/Airy,” “Gritty” were used less often. Our results identified commonly used texture terms and revealed differential usage in older and younger adults. These data deepen our understanding of the texture of foods in the modern food environment, highlighting how texture perception may vary with age.</p>","PeriodicalId":17175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of texture studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtxs.12791","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of texture studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jtxs.12791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the use of food texture terms by adults in the northeastern United States. The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of food texture on food liking and texture term usage among age groups via two complementary online surveys that differed in the specific task given to participants. Survey 1 gathered common food items associated with 25 texture terms using open-ended questions from 345 participants (45% men, 55% women; age range = 20–79 years); it also collected liking scores for foods with these textures. Next, a new group of participants (n = 349, 46% men, 54% women; age range = 20–79 years) completed Survey 2, which asked them to match up to three texture terms to 32 different foods drawn from Survey 1, using a provided list of 35 texture terms. “Tough,” “Chalky,” and “Rubbery” had a negative impact on food liking scores while “Tender,” “Juicy,” and “Crispy” were associated with higher mean food liking scores. “Soft,” “Crunchy,” “Crispy,” “Juicy,” and “Greasy” were commonly used texture terms regardless of age. Within those aged 50–79 years, “Smooth,” “Tender,” “Crunchy,” “Soft,” “Moist,” “Crispy,” and “Creamy” were used more often while “Chalky,” “Rough,” “Mealy,” “Foamy/Airy,” “Gritty” were used less often. Our results identified commonly used texture terms and revealed differential usage in older and younger adults. These data deepen our understanding of the texture of foods in the modern food environment, highlighting how texture perception may vary with age.

Abstract Image

质地术语的使用和两组不同年龄的美国人的享乐评分。
这项研究探讨了美国东北部成年人对食物质地术语的使用。这项研究的目的是通过两项互补性的在线调查来比较食物质地对不同年龄组的食物喜好和质地术语使用的影响,这两项调查在分配给参与者的具体任务中有所不同。调查1收集了345名参与者(45%的男性,55%的女性;年龄范围= 20-79岁);它还收集了具有这些质地的食物的喜欢分数。接下来,一组新的参与者(n = 349, 46%男性,54%女性;年龄范围= 20-79岁)完成了调查2,该调查要求他们使用提供的35个质地术语列表,将最多3个质地术语与调查1中提取的32种不同食物相匹配。“硬”、“白垩”和“橡胶”对食物喜欢得分有负面影响,而“嫩”、“多汁”和“脆”与较高的平均食物喜欢得分相关。“软的”、“脆的”、“脆的”、“多汁的”和“油腻的”是无论年龄大小都常用的质地术语。在50-79岁的人群中,“光滑的”、“嫩的”、“脆的”、“软的”、“湿润的”、“脆的”和“奶油状的”使用频率更高,而“白垩的”、“粗糙的”、“粉嫩的”、“泡沫/蓬松的”、“粗糙的”使用频率较低。我们的结果确定了常用的纹理术语,并揭示了老年人和年轻人的不同用法。这些数据加深了我们对现代食品环境中食物质地的理解,突出了质地感知如何随着年龄的变化而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of texture studies
Journal of texture studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Texture Studies is a fully peer-reviewed international journal specialized in the physics, physiology, and psychology of food oral processing, with an emphasis on the food texture and structure, sensory perception and mouth-feel, food oral behaviour, food liking and preference. The journal was first published in 1969 and has been the primary source for disseminating advances in knowledge on all of the sciences that relate to food texture. In recent years, Journal of Texture Studies has expanded its coverage to a much broader range of texture research and continues to publish high quality original and innovative experimental-based (including numerical analysis and simulation) research concerned with all aspects of eating and food preference. Journal of Texture Studies welcomes research articles, research notes, reviews, discussion papers, and communications from contributors of all relevant disciplines. Some key coverage areas/topics include (but not limited to): • Physical, mechanical, and micro-structural principles of food texture • Oral physiology • Psychology and brain responses of eating and food sensory • Food texture design and modification for specific consumers • In vitro and in vivo studies of eating and swallowing • Novel technologies and methodologies for the assessment of sensory properties • Simulation and numerical analysis of eating and swallowing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信