The effect of skilled motor training on corticomotor control of back muscles in different presentations of low back pain

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Muath A Shraim , Hugo Massé-Alarie , Sauro E Salomoni , Paul W Hodges
{"title":"The effect of skilled motor training on corticomotor control of back muscles in different presentations of low back pain","authors":"Muath A Shraim ,&nbsp;Hugo Massé-Alarie ,&nbsp;Sauro E Salomoni ,&nbsp;Paul W Hodges","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has revealed differences in the motor cortex (M1) between people with and without low back pain (LBP). There is potential to reverse these changes using motor skill training, but it remains unclear whether changes can be induced in people with LBP or whether this differs between LBP presentations. This study (1) compared TMS measures of M1 (single and paired-pulse) and performance of a motor task (lumbopelvic tilting) between individuals with LBP of predominant nociceptive (n = 9) or nociplastic presentation (n = 9) and pain-free individuals (n = 16); (2) compared these measures pre- and post-training; and (3) explored correlations between TMS measures, motor performance, and clinical features. TMS measures did not differ between groups at baseline. The nociplastic group undershot the target in the motor task. Despite improved motor performance for all groups, only MEP amplitudes increased across the recruitment curve and only for the pain-free and nociplastic groups. TMS measures did not correlate with motor performance or clinical features. Some elements of motor task performance and changes in corticomotor excitability differed between LBP groups. Absence of changes in intra-cortical TMS measures suggests regions other than M1 are likely to be involved in skill learning of back muscles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105064112300041X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has revealed differences in the motor cortex (M1) between people with and without low back pain (LBP). There is potential to reverse these changes using motor skill training, but it remains unclear whether changes can be induced in people with LBP or whether this differs between LBP presentations. This study (1) compared TMS measures of M1 (single and paired-pulse) and performance of a motor task (lumbopelvic tilting) between individuals with LBP of predominant nociceptive (n = 9) or nociplastic presentation (n = 9) and pain-free individuals (n = 16); (2) compared these measures pre- and post-training; and (3) explored correlations between TMS measures, motor performance, and clinical features. TMS measures did not differ between groups at baseline. The nociplastic group undershot the target in the motor task. Despite improved motor performance for all groups, only MEP amplitudes increased across the recruitment curve and only for the pain-free and nociplastic groups. TMS measures did not correlate with motor performance or clinical features. Some elements of motor task performance and changes in corticomotor excitability differed between LBP groups. Absence of changes in intra-cortical TMS measures suggests regions other than M1 are likely to be involved in skill learning of back muscles.

熟练运动训练对不同腰痛表现下背部肌肉皮质运动控制的影响
经颅磁刺激(TMS)揭示了患有和不患有腰痛(LBP)的人的运动皮层(M1)的差异。使用运动技能训练有可能逆转这些变化,但尚不清楚LBP患者是否会发生变化,也不清楚不同的LBP表现是否不同。本研究(1)比较了主要伤害性LBP(n=9)或伤害性表现LBP(n=9)和无疼痛个体(n=16)的M1(单脉冲和成对脉冲)的TMS测量值和运动任务(腰痛倾斜)的表现;(2) 比较了培训前和培训后的这些措施;以及(3)探讨了TMS测量、运动表现和临床特征之间的相关性。TMS测量在基线时各组之间没有差异。在运动任务中,非运动弹性组的成绩低于目标。尽管所有组的运动表现都有所改善,但只有MEP振幅在募集曲线上增加,而且只有无痛组和无炎症组的MEP振幅增加。TMS测量与运动表现或临床特征无关。LBP组运动任务表现和皮质运动兴奋性变化的一些因素不同。皮层内TMS测量没有变化,这表明M1以外的区域可能参与背部肌肉的技能学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信