Relationship between labial bone dimensions, labio-palatal implant position and esthetic outcomes of single tooth implants.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Shakeel Shahdad, Jamil Makdissi, Ana Gambôa
{"title":"Relationship between labial bone dimensions, labio-palatal implant position and esthetic outcomes of single tooth implants.","authors":"Shakeel Shahdad, Jamil Makdissi, Ana Gambôa","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the association between the oro-facial implant position distance (ID) and facial bone crest thickness (FBCT) in single-tooth implant crowns (STIC) placed in the esthetic zone, and predict presence of facial bone above the implant shoulder and its impact on Pink and White Esthetic Score (PES and WES) and patient related outcome measurements (PROMS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, all patients treated with STIC in esthetic zone between 2006 and 2013, with at least 12 months post-loading were invited to enroll. CBCTs were used to assess ID and FBCT. Esthetic outcomes included the PES and WES. PROMS measures included participants' satisfaction questionnaire with 13 formulated questions for this study. Descriptive statistics and ROC analysis were used. The association between ID, FBCT, esthetic outcomes and PROMS were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was available for 60 implants. Mean ID was 2.02mm (SD=0.77). Mean FBCT at implant shoulder was 0.99mm (SD=0.98). FBCT was significantly associated with higher PES scores (<i>P</i>=0.040), but not with WES scores (<i>P</i>=0.149). FBCT was significantly associated with ID (<i>P</i>=0.009) and implants positioned ≥ 1.6mm palatal in relation to the adjacent teeth were likely to have higher FBCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FBCT influences PES and is more predictable if implants are positioned ≥ 1.6mm palatal in relation to the adjacent teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2023. Doi: 10.11607/ijp.8052.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the association between the oro-facial implant position distance (ID) and facial bone crest thickness (FBCT) in single-tooth implant crowns (STIC) placed in the esthetic zone, and predict presence of facial bone above the implant shoulder and its impact on Pink and White Esthetic Score (PES and WES) and patient related outcome measurements (PROMS).

Material and methods: In this cross-sectional study, all patients treated with STIC in esthetic zone between 2006 and 2013, with at least 12 months post-loading were invited to enroll. CBCTs were used to assess ID and FBCT. Esthetic outcomes included the PES and WES. PROMS measures included participants' satisfaction questionnaire with 13 formulated questions for this study. Descriptive statistics and ROC analysis were used. The association between ID, FBCT, esthetic outcomes and PROMS were calculated.

Results: Data was available for 60 implants. Mean ID was 2.02mm (SD=0.77). Mean FBCT at implant shoulder was 0.99mm (SD=0.98). FBCT was significantly associated with higher PES scores (P=0.040), but not with WES scores (P=0.149). FBCT was significantly associated with ID (P=0.009) and implants positioned ≥ 1.6mm palatal in relation to the adjacent teeth were likely to have higher FBCT.

Conclusions: FBCT influences PES and is more predictable if implants are positioned ≥ 1.6mm palatal in relation to the adjacent teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2023. Doi: 10.11607/ijp.8052.

唇骨尺寸、唇腭种植体位置与单牙种植的美学效果之间的关系。
目的:研究在美学区植入单牙种植冠(STIC)的口面部种植体位置距离(ID)和面部骨嵴厚度(FBCT)之间的关系,预测种植体肩部以上面部骨质的存在及其对粉色和白色美学评分(PES和WES)和患者相关结果测量(PROMS)的影响:在这项横断面研究中,所有在2006年至2013年期间在美学区接受STIC治疗的患者都被邀请参加,这些患者在植入后至少有12个月的时间。CBCT用于评估ID和FBCT。美学结果包括 PES 和 WES。PROMS测量包括参与者的满意度问卷,其中有13个问题是为本研究制定的。研究采用了描述性统计和 ROC 分析。计算了ID、FBCT、美学结果和PROMS之间的关联:共获得 60 个种植体的数据。平均内径为 2.02 毫米(SD=0.77)。种植体肩部的平均 FBCT 为 0.99 毫米(标准差=0.98)。FBCT与较高的PES评分有明显相关性(P=0.040),但与WES评分无关(P=0.149)。FBCT与ID明显相关(P=0.009),相对于邻牙腭侧位置≥1.6mm的种植体可能具有更高的FBCT:结论:FBCT 对 PES 有影响,如果种植体与邻牙的腭侧距离≥ 1.6 毫米,则 FBCT 的可预测性更高。Int J Prosthodont 2023.Doi: 10.11607/ijp.8052.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Prosthodontics
International Journal of Prosthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP) Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信