Modeling and mitigating supply chain disruptions as a bilevel network flow problem.

IF 1.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS
Computational Management Science Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-28 DOI:10.1007/s10287-022-00421-3
René Y Glogg, Anna Timonina-Farkas, Ralf W Seifert
{"title":"Modeling and mitigating supply chain disruptions as a bilevel network flow problem.","authors":"René Y Glogg,&nbsp;Anna Timonina-Farkas,&nbsp;Ralf W Seifert","doi":"10.1007/s10287-022-00421-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Years of globalization, outsourcing and cost cutting have increased supply chain vulnerability calling for more effective risk mitigation strategies. In our research, we analyze supply chain disruptions in a production setting. Using a bilevel optimization framework, we minimize the total production cost for a manufacturer interested in finding optimal disruption mitigation strategies. The problem constitutes a convex network flow program under a chance constraint bounding the manufacturer's regrets in disrupted scenarios. Thus, in contrast to standard bilevel optimization schemes with two decision-makers, a leader and a follower, our model searches for the optimal production plan of a manufacturer in view of a reduction in the sequence of his own scenario-specific regrets. Defined as the difference in costs of a <i>reactive plan</i>, which considers the disruption as unknown until it occurs, and a benchmark <i>anticipative plan</i>, which predicts the disruption in the beginning of the planning horizon, the regrets allow measurement of the impact of scenario-specific production strategies on the manufacturer's total cost. For an efficient solution of the problem, we employ generalized Benders decomposition and develop customized feasibility cuts. In the managerial section, we discuss the implications for the risk-adjusted production and observe that the regrets of long disruptions are reduced in our mitigation strategy at the cost of shorter disruptions, whose regrets typically stay far below the risk threshold. This allows a decrease of the production cost under rare but high-impact disruption scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":46743,"journal":{"name":"Computational Management Science","volume":"19 3","pages":"395-423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8882721/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-022-00421-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Years of globalization, outsourcing and cost cutting have increased supply chain vulnerability calling for more effective risk mitigation strategies. In our research, we analyze supply chain disruptions in a production setting. Using a bilevel optimization framework, we minimize the total production cost for a manufacturer interested in finding optimal disruption mitigation strategies. The problem constitutes a convex network flow program under a chance constraint bounding the manufacturer's regrets in disrupted scenarios. Thus, in contrast to standard bilevel optimization schemes with two decision-makers, a leader and a follower, our model searches for the optimal production plan of a manufacturer in view of a reduction in the sequence of his own scenario-specific regrets. Defined as the difference in costs of a reactive plan, which considers the disruption as unknown until it occurs, and a benchmark anticipative plan, which predicts the disruption in the beginning of the planning horizon, the regrets allow measurement of the impact of scenario-specific production strategies on the manufacturer's total cost. For an efficient solution of the problem, we employ generalized Benders decomposition and develop customized feasibility cuts. In the managerial section, we discuss the implications for the risk-adjusted production and observe that the regrets of long disruptions are reduced in our mitigation strategy at the cost of shorter disruptions, whose regrets typically stay far below the risk threshold. This allows a decrease of the production cost under rare but high-impact disruption scenarios.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

将供应链中断建模和缓解为双层网络流问题。
多年的全球化、外包和成本削减增加了供应链的脆弱性,需要更有效的风险缓解策略。在我们的研究中,我们分析了生产环境中的供应链中断。使用双层优化框架,我们将有兴趣寻找最佳中断缓解策略的制造商的总生产成本降至最低。该问题构成了一个在机会约束下的凸网络流程序,该程序限制了制造商在中断场景中的遗憾。因此,与具有两个决策者(一个领导者和一个追随者)的标准双层优化方案相比,我们的模型搜索制造商的最佳生产计划,以减少他自己的特定场景遗憾的序列。遗憾被定义为反应性计划和基准预期计划的成本差异,反应性计划认为中断在发生之前是未知的,基准预期计划在规划期开始时预测中断,遗憾允许衡量特定场景的生产策略对制造商总成本的影响。为了有效地解决这个问题,我们采用了广义Benders分解,并开发了定制的可行性切割。在管理部分,我们讨论了风险调整生产的影响,并观察到,在我们的缓解策略中,长期中断的遗憾是以较短的中断为代价的,而较短的干扰的遗憾通常远低于风险阈值。这允许在罕见但影响较大的中断情况下降低生产成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Management Science
Computational Management Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Computational Management Science (CMS) is an international journal focusing on all computational aspects of management science. These include theoretical and empirical analysis of computational models; computational statistics; analysis and applications of constrained, unconstrained, robust, stochastic and combinatorial optimisation algorithms; dynamic models, such as dynamic programming and decision trees; new search tools and algorithms for global optimisation, modelling, learning and forecasting; models and tools of knowledge acquisition. The emphasis on computational paradigms is an intended feature of CMS, distinguishing it from more classical operations research journals. Officially cited as: Comput Manag Sci
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信