Non-nulling protocols for fast, accurate, 3-D velocity measurements in stacks.

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Iosif I Shinder, Aaron N Johnson, B James Filla, Vladimir B Khromchenko, Michael R Moldover, Joey Boyd, John D Wright, John Stoup
{"title":"Non-nulling protocols for fast, accurate, 3-D velocity measurements in stacks.","authors":"Iosif I Shinder, Aaron N Johnson, B James Filla, Vladimir B Khromchenko, Michael R Moldover, Joey Boyd, John D Wright, John Stoup","doi":"10.1080/10962247.2023.2218827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors present protocols for making fast, accurate, 3D velocity measurements in the stacks of coal-fired power plants. The measurements are traceable to internationally-recognized standards; therefore, they provide a rigorous basis for measuring and/or regulating the emissions from stacks. The authors used novel, five-hole, hemispherical, differential-pressure probes optimized for non-nulling (no-probe rotation) measurements. The probes resist plugging from ash and water droplets. Integrating the differential pressures for only 5 seconds determined the axial velocity <i>V</i><sub>a</sub> with an expanded relative uncertainty <i>U</i><sub>r</sub>(<i>V</i><sub>a</sub>) ≤ 2% of the axial velocity at the probe's location, the flow's pitch (α) and yaw (β) angles with expanded uncertainties <i>U(α)</i> = <i>U(β)</i> = 1 °, and the static pressure <i>p</i><sub>s</sub> with <i>U</i><sub>r</sub>(<i>p</i><sub>s</sub>) = 0.1% of the static pressure. This accuracy was achieved 1) by calibrating each probe in a wind tunnel at 130, strategically-chosen values of (<i>V</i><sub>a</sub>, <i>α, β</i>) spanning the conditions found in the majority of stacks (|<i>α</i>| ≤ 20 °; |<i>β</i>| ≤ 40 °; 4.5 m/s ≤ <i>V</i><sub>a </sub>≤27 m/s), and 2) by using a long-forgotten definition of the pseudo-dynamic pressure that scales with the dynamic pressure. The resulting calibration functions span the probe-diameter Reynolds number range from 7,600 to 45,000.<i>Implications</i>: The continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) that measure the flue gas flow rate in coal-fired power plant smokestacks are calibrated (at least) annually by a velocity profiling method. The stack axial velocity profile is measured by traversing S-type pitot probes (or one of the other EPA-sanctioned pitot probes) across two orthogonal, diametric chords in the stack cross-section. The average area-weighted axial velocity calculated from the pitot traverse quantifies the accuracy of the CEMS flow monitor. Therefore, the flow measurement accuracy of coal-fired power plants greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions depends on the accuracy of pitot probe velocity measurements. Coal-fired power plants overwhelmingly calibrate CEMS flow monitors using S-type pitot probes. Almost always, stack testers measure the velocity without rotating or nulling the probe (i.e., the non-nulling method). These 1D non-nulling velocity measurements take significantly less time than the corresponding 2D nulling measurements (or 3D nulling measurements for other probe types). However, the accuracy of the 1D non-nulling velocity measurements made using S-type probes depends on the pitch and yaw angles of the flow. Measured axial velocities are accurate at pitch and yaw angles near zero, but the accuracy degrades at larger pitch and yaw angles.The authors developed a 5-hole hemispherical pitot probe that accurately measures the velocity vector in coal-fired smokestacks without needing to rotate or null the probe. This non-nulling, 3D probe is designed with large diameter pressure ports to prevent water droplets (or particulates) from obstructing its pressure ports when applied in stack flow measurement applications. This manuscript presents a wind tunnel calibration procedure to determine the non-nulling calibration curves for 1) dynamic pressure; 2) pitch angle; 3) yaw angle; and 4) static pressure. These calibration curves are used to determine axial velocities from 6 m/s to 27 m/s, yaw angles between ±40°, and pitch angles between ±20°. The uncertainties at the 95% confidence limit for axial velocity, yaw angle, and pitch angle are 2% (or less), 1°, and 1°, respectively. Therefore, in contrast to existing EPA-sanctioned probes, the non-nulling hemispherical probe provides fast, low uncertainty velocity measurements independent of the pitch and yaw angles of the stack flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":49171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","volume":"73 8","pages":"600-617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10867762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2023.2218827","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors present protocols for making fast, accurate, 3D velocity measurements in the stacks of coal-fired power plants. The measurements are traceable to internationally-recognized standards; therefore, they provide a rigorous basis for measuring and/or regulating the emissions from stacks. The authors used novel, five-hole, hemispherical, differential-pressure probes optimized for non-nulling (no-probe rotation) measurements. The probes resist plugging from ash and water droplets. Integrating the differential pressures for only 5 seconds determined the axial velocity Va with an expanded relative uncertainty Ur(Va) ≤ 2% of the axial velocity at the probe's location, the flow's pitch (α) and yaw (β) angles with expanded uncertainties U(α) = U(β) = 1 °, and the static pressure ps with Ur(ps) = 0.1% of the static pressure. This accuracy was achieved 1) by calibrating each probe in a wind tunnel at 130, strategically-chosen values of (Va, α, β) spanning the conditions found in the majority of stacks (|α| ≤ 20 °; |β| ≤ 40 °; 4.5 m/s ≤ Va ≤27 m/s), and 2) by using a long-forgotten definition of the pseudo-dynamic pressure that scales with the dynamic pressure. The resulting calibration functions span the probe-diameter Reynolds number range from 7,600 to 45,000.Implications: The continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) that measure the flue gas flow rate in coal-fired power plant smokestacks are calibrated (at least) annually by a velocity profiling method. The stack axial velocity profile is measured by traversing S-type pitot probes (or one of the other EPA-sanctioned pitot probes) across two orthogonal, diametric chords in the stack cross-section. The average area-weighted axial velocity calculated from the pitot traverse quantifies the accuracy of the CEMS flow monitor. Therefore, the flow measurement accuracy of coal-fired power plants greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions depends on the accuracy of pitot probe velocity measurements. Coal-fired power plants overwhelmingly calibrate CEMS flow monitors using S-type pitot probes. Almost always, stack testers measure the velocity without rotating or nulling the probe (i.e., the non-nulling method). These 1D non-nulling velocity measurements take significantly less time than the corresponding 2D nulling measurements (or 3D nulling measurements for other probe types). However, the accuracy of the 1D non-nulling velocity measurements made using S-type probes depends on the pitch and yaw angles of the flow. Measured axial velocities are accurate at pitch and yaw angles near zero, but the accuracy degrades at larger pitch and yaw angles.The authors developed a 5-hole hemispherical pitot probe that accurately measures the velocity vector in coal-fired smokestacks without needing to rotate or null the probe. This non-nulling, 3D probe is designed with large diameter pressure ports to prevent water droplets (or particulates) from obstructing its pressure ports when applied in stack flow measurement applications. This manuscript presents a wind tunnel calibration procedure to determine the non-nulling calibration curves for 1) dynamic pressure; 2) pitch angle; 3) yaw angle; and 4) static pressure. These calibration curves are used to determine axial velocities from 6 m/s to 27 m/s, yaw angles between ±40°, and pitch angles between ±20°. The uncertainties at the 95% confidence limit for axial velocity, yaw angle, and pitch angle are 2% (or less), 1°, and 1°, respectively. Therefore, in contrast to existing EPA-sanctioned probes, the non-nulling hemispherical probe provides fast, low uncertainty velocity measurements independent of the pitch and yaw angles of the stack flow.

用于快速、准确、三维叠层速度测量的非归零协议。
作者介绍了在燃煤发电厂烟囱中进行快速、准确、三维速度测量的规程。测量结果可追溯到国际公认的标准;因此,它们为测量和/或监管烟囱排放提供了严格的依据。作者使用了新颖的五孔半球形压差探头,该探头经过优化,可进行非归零(无探头旋转)测量。这种探头可以防止灰尘和水滴堵塞。对压差进行仅 5 秒钟的积分,确定了轴向速度 Va(相对不确定度 Ur(Va) ≤ 探测器位置处轴向速度的 2%)、流动的俯仰角 (α) 和偏航角 (β)(不确定度 U(α) = U(β) = 1 °)以及静压 ps(不确定度 Ur(ps) = 静压的 0.1%)。实现这一精度的方法是:1)在风洞中对每个探头进行校准,校准条件为战略性选择的 130 个 (Va、α、β) 值,涵盖大多数烟囱中发现的条件(|α| ≤ 20 °;|β| ≤ 40 °;4.5 m/s ≤ Va ≤ 27 m/s);2)使用早已被遗忘的伪动态压力定义,该定义与动态压力成比例。由此得到的校准函数的探头直径雷诺数范围为 7,600 到 45,000:测量燃煤发电厂烟囱中烟气流速的连续排放监控系统(CEMS)每年(至少)通过速度剖面法进行校准。烟囱轴向速度剖面是通过横穿烟囱横截面上两个正交的直径弦的 S 型皮托管探头(或环保局认可的其他皮托管探头之一)来测量的。根据坑道横截面计算出的平均面积加权轴向速度可量化 CEMS 流量监测器的准确性。因此,燃煤发电厂温室气体(GHG)排放的流量测量精度取决于皮托管速度测量的精度。燃煤发电厂绝大多数使用 S 型皮托管探头校准 CEMS 流量监测器。烟囱测试人员几乎总是在不旋转探头或不归零的情况下测量速度(即非归零法)。与相应的二维空程测量(或其他探头类型的三维空程测量)相比,一维非空程速度测量所需的时间要少得多。不过,使用 S 型探头进行一维非归零速度测量的精度取决于气流的俯仰角和偏航角。在俯仰角和偏航角接近于零时,测量的轴向速度是准确的,但在俯仰角和偏航角较大时,准确度会降低。作者开发了一种 5 孔半球形坑道探头,无需旋转或归零探头即可准确测量燃煤烟囱中的速度矢量。这种不归零的三维探头采用大直径压力端口设计,以防止水滴(或颗粒)在烟囱流量测量应用中阻塞其压力端口。本手稿介绍了风洞校准程序,以确定 1) 动态压力、2) 俯仰角、3) 偏航角和 4) 静态压力的非归零校准曲线。这些校准曲线用于确定 6 m/s 至 27 m/s 的轴向速度、±40° 之间的偏航角以及 ±20° 之间的俯仰角。轴向速度、偏航角和俯仰角在 95% 置信限下的不确定性分别为 2%(或更小)、1° 和 1°。因此,与现有的美国环保局认可的探头相比,非归零半球形探头可提供快速、低不确定性的速度测量,不受烟囱气流俯仰角和偏航角的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (J&AWMA) is one of the oldest continuously published, peer-reviewed, technical environmental journals in the world. First published in 1951 under the name Air Repair, J&AWMA is intended to serve those occupationally involved in air pollution control and waste management through the publication of timely and reliable information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信