Association Between Electrocardiographic Age and Cardiovascular Events in Community Settings: The Framingham Heart Study.

IF 6.9 2区 医学
Luisa C C Brant, Antônio H Ribeiro, Marcelo M Pinto-Filho, Jelena Kornej, Sarah R Preis, Jessica L Fetterman, Oseiwe B Eromosele, Jared W Magnani, Joanne M Murabito, Martin G Larson, Emelia J Benjamin, Antonio L P Ribeiro, Honghuang Lin
{"title":"Association Between Electrocardiographic Age and Cardiovascular Events in Community Settings: The Framingham Heart Study.","authors":"Luisa C C Brant, Antônio H Ribeiro, Marcelo M Pinto-Filho, Jelena Kornej, Sarah R Preis, Jessica L Fetterman, Oseiwe B Eromosele, Jared W Magnani, Joanne M Murabito, Martin G Larson, Emelia J Benjamin, Antonio L P Ribeiro, Honghuang Lin","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep neural networks have been used to estimate age from ECGs, the electrocardiographic age (ECG-age), which predicts adverse outcomes. However, this prediction ability has been restricted to clinical settings or relatively short periods. We hypothesized that ECG-age is associated with death and cardiovascular outcomes in the long-standing community-based FHS (Framingham Heart Study).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested the association of ECG-age with chronological age in the FHS cohorts in ECGs from 1986 to 2021. We calculated the gap between chronological and ECG-age (Δage) and classified individuals as having normal, accelerated, or decelerated aging, if Δage was within, higher, or lower than the mean absolute error of the model, respectively. We assessed the associations of Δage, accelerated and decelerated aging with death or cardiovascular outcomes (atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and heart failure) using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 9877 FHS participants (mean age, 55±13 years; 54.9% women) with 34 948 ECGs. ECG-age was correlated to chronological age (r=0.81; mean absolute error, 9±7 years). After 17±8 years of follow-up, every 10-year increase of Δage was associated with 18% increase in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.23]), 23% increase in atrial fibrillation risk (HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.17-1.29]), 14% increase in myocardial infarction risk (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.05-1.23]), and 40% increase in heart failure risk (HR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.30-1.52]), in multivariable models. In addition, accelerated aging was associated with a 28% increase in all-cause mortality (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.14-1.45]), whereas decelerated aging was associated with a 16% decrease (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.74-0.95]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECG-age was highly correlated with chronological age in FHS. The difference between ECG-age and chronological age was associated with death, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. Given the wide availability and low cost of ECG, ECG-age could be a scalable biomarker of cardiovascular risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10301,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":"16 7","pages":"e009821"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10524985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009821","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deep neural networks have been used to estimate age from ECGs, the electrocardiographic age (ECG-age), which predicts adverse outcomes. However, this prediction ability has been restricted to clinical settings or relatively short periods. We hypothesized that ECG-age is associated with death and cardiovascular outcomes in the long-standing community-based FHS (Framingham Heart Study).

Methods: We tested the association of ECG-age with chronological age in the FHS cohorts in ECGs from 1986 to 2021. We calculated the gap between chronological and ECG-age (Δage) and classified individuals as having normal, accelerated, or decelerated aging, if Δage was within, higher, or lower than the mean absolute error of the model, respectively. We assessed the associations of Δage, accelerated and decelerated aging with death or cardiovascular outcomes (atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and heart failure) using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and clinical factors.

Results: The study population included 9877 FHS participants (mean age, 55±13 years; 54.9% women) with 34 948 ECGs. ECG-age was correlated to chronological age (r=0.81; mean absolute error, 9±7 years). After 17±8 years of follow-up, every 10-year increase of Δage was associated with 18% increase in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.23]), 23% increase in atrial fibrillation risk (HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.17-1.29]), 14% increase in myocardial infarction risk (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.05-1.23]), and 40% increase in heart failure risk (HR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.30-1.52]), in multivariable models. In addition, accelerated aging was associated with a 28% increase in all-cause mortality (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.14-1.45]), whereas decelerated aging was associated with a 16% decrease (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.74-0.95]).

Conclusions: ECG-age was highly correlated with chronological age in FHS. The difference between ECG-age and chronological age was associated with death, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. Given the wide availability and low cost of ECG, ECG-age could be a scalable biomarker of cardiovascular risk.

社区环境中心电图年龄与心血管事件的关系:弗雷明汉心脏研究。
背景:深度神经网络已被用于从心电图中估计年龄,即心电图年龄(ECG年龄),它可以预测不良结果。然而,这种预测能力仅限于临床环境或相对较短的时期。在长期基于社区的FHS(Framingham心脏研究)中,我们假设心电图年龄与死亡和心血管结果相关。方法:我们在1986年至2021年的心电图中测试了FHS队列中心电图年龄与年龄的相关性。我们计算了时间年龄和心电图年龄之间的差距(Δ年龄),并将个体分类为正常、加速或减速衰老,如果Δ年龄分别在、高于或低于模型的平均绝对误差。我们使用Cox比例风险模型评估了Δ年龄、加速和减速衰老与死亡或心血管后果(心房颤动、心肌梗死和心力衰竭)的关系,该模型根据年龄、性别和临床因素进行了调整。结果:研究人群包括9877名FHS参与者(平均年龄55±13岁;54.9%为女性),心电图为34948次。心电图年龄与实际年龄相关(r=0.81;平均绝对误差为9±7岁)。经过17±8年的随访,Δ年龄每增加10年,全因死亡率就会增加18%(危险比[HR],1.18[95%CI,1.12-1.23]),心房颤动风险会增加23%(HR,1.23[95%CI;1.17-1.29]),心肌梗死风险会增加14%(HR,1.14[95%CI:1.05-123]),心力衰竭风险会增加40%(HR,1.40[95%CI:1.30-1.52]),在多变量模型中。此外,加速衰老可使全因死亡率增加28%(HR,1.28[95%CI,1.14-1.45]),而减速衰老可使死亡率降低16%(HR,0.84]95%CI,0.74-0.95])。心电图年龄和实际年龄之间的差异与死亡、心肌梗死、心房颤动和心力衰竭有关。鉴于心电图的广泛可用性和低成本,心电图年龄可能是心血管风险的可扩展生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信