Experience and expectations of pharmacogenetic tests in France

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Simon Verdez , Marc Bardou , Yannis Duffourd , Maxime Luu , Christel Thauvin-Robinet , Laurence Faivre , Nicolas Picard
{"title":"Experience and expectations of pharmacogenetic tests in France","authors":"Simon Verdez ,&nbsp;Marc Bardou ,&nbsp;Yannis Duffourd ,&nbsp;Maxime Luu ,&nbsp;Christel Thauvin-Robinet ,&nbsp;Laurence Faivre ,&nbsp;Nicolas Picard","doi":"10.1016/j.therap.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although French genomic medicine is reaching a turning point in its history and the implementation of genome sequencing in routine is being implemented as part of the France Genomic Medicine 2025 Plan (FGMP), many questions about secondary data management remain to be addressed. In particular, the use of pharmacogenetic<span> (PGx) information that can be extracted from genome data is a concern. We sought to analyze the opinion of French health professionals on their desire to have access to this information. For this purpose, we created a 22-item questionnaire on the experiences, attitudes, expectations, and knowledge of French physicians and pharmacists about PGx. We collected the responses in different groups and determined a knowledge score with the last 3 questions of the questionnaire. Then, we built a prediction model for this score and determined which factors may influence it. Half of the responders were physicians (158/311) and the other half were pharmacists (153/311), and the majority of them worked in a hospital (265/311). Almost two third (62.7%, 195/311) of the responders thought that pharmacogenetic data should be communicated with genomic results for the primary indication within the framework of FGMP, and 89.1% (277/311) of them that PGx tests could be an interesting tool to optimize patients’ drug therapy in the future. Only 11.2% (35/311) of the responders reached the maximum knowledge score, while 25.4% (76/311) had already prescribed or recommended a PGx test. This study identified a need for training for French physicians and pharmacists in PGx, particularly given the interest of health professionals in it.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":23147,"journal":{"name":"Therapie","volume":"79 3","pages":"Pages 341-349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040595723001038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although French genomic medicine is reaching a turning point in its history and the implementation of genome sequencing in routine is being implemented as part of the France Genomic Medicine 2025 Plan (FGMP), many questions about secondary data management remain to be addressed. In particular, the use of pharmacogenetic (PGx) information that can be extracted from genome data is a concern. We sought to analyze the opinion of French health professionals on their desire to have access to this information. For this purpose, we created a 22-item questionnaire on the experiences, attitudes, expectations, and knowledge of French physicians and pharmacists about PGx. We collected the responses in different groups and determined a knowledge score with the last 3 questions of the questionnaire. Then, we built a prediction model for this score and determined which factors may influence it. Half of the responders were physicians (158/311) and the other half were pharmacists (153/311), and the majority of them worked in a hospital (265/311). Almost two third (62.7%, 195/311) of the responders thought that pharmacogenetic data should be communicated with genomic results for the primary indication within the framework of FGMP, and 89.1% (277/311) of them that PGx tests could be an interesting tool to optimize patients’ drug therapy in the future. Only 11.2% (35/311) of the responders reached the maximum knowledge score, while 25.4% (76/311) had already prescribed or recommended a PGx test. This study identified a need for training for French physicians and pharmacists in PGx, particularly given the interest of health professionals in it.

法国对药物基因检测的经验和期望。
法国基因组医学正处于历史的转折点,作为法国基因组医学 2025 计划(FGMP)的一部分,法国正在实施常规基因组测序,但二次数据管理的许多问题仍有待解决。从基因组数据中提取的药物遗传学(PGx)信息的使用尤其令人担忧。我们试图分析法国医疗专业人员对获取这些信息的愿望的看法。为此,我们制作了一份包含 22 个项目的调查问卷,内容涉及法国医生和药剂师对 PGx 的经验、态度、期望和知识。我们收集了不同组别的回答,并根据问卷的最后 3 个问题确定了知识得分。然后,我们为该分数建立了一个预测模型,并确定了可能影响该分数的因素。一半的回答者是医生(158/311),另一半是药剂师(153/311),其中大多数人在医院工作(265/311)。近三分之二(62.7%,195/311)的受访者认为,在 FGMP 框架内,药物基因数据应与主要适应症的基因组结果一起交流,其中 89.1%(277/311)的受访者认为,PGx 检测可能是未来优化患者药物治疗的一个有趣工具。只有 11.2%(35/311)的受访者达到了最高知识分数,而 25.4%(76/311)的受访者已经开具或推荐了 PGx 检测。这项研究发现,有必要对法国医生和药剂师进行 PGx 方面的培训,尤其是考虑到医疗专业人员对 PGx 的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapie
Therapie 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
132
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Thérapie is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to Clinical Pharmacology, Therapeutics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacovigilance, Addictovigilance, Social Pharmacology, Pharmacoepidemiology, Pharmacoeconomics and Evidence-Based-Medicine. Thérapie publishes in French or in English original articles, general reviews, letters to the editor reporting original findings, correspondence relating to articles or letters published in the Journal, short articles, editorials on up-to-date topics, Pharmacovigilance or Addictovigilance reports that follow the French "guidelines" concerning good practice in pharmacovigilance publications. The journal also publishes thematic issues on topical subject. The journal is indexed in the main international data bases and notably in: Biosis Previews/Biological Abstracts, Embase/Excerpta Medica, Medline/Index Medicus, Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信