Impact of the contraction of medial forearm muscles during grip tasks in different forearm positions on medial support at the elbow joint

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Hiroaki Koizumi , Mineo Oyama , Masahiro Odagiri , Noriyuki Shioda , Chihiro Fujime , Nozomu Kusano
{"title":"Impact of the contraction of medial forearm muscles during grip tasks in different forearm positions on medial support at the elbow joint","authors":"Hiroaki Koizumi ,&nbsp;Mineo Oyama ,&nbsp;Masahiro Odagiri ,&nbsp;Noriyuki Shioda ,&nbsp;Chihiro Fujime ,&nbsp;Nozomu Kusano","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2023.102783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We measured the medial joint distance (MJD), activity of muscles involved in medial elbow-joint support, and grip strength, aiming to examine the supportfunction of muscles.</p><p><span><span>MJD was measured in supinated and pronated positions of the forearm of 10 participants under three conditions: at rest (R), under valgus load on the elbow joint (L), and under valgus load on the elbow joint during the grip task (L-grip). Under the L-grip condition, </span>electromyography was performed on flexor </span>digitorum<span> superficialis (FDS), pronator teres (PT), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU); subsequently, normalized integrated electromyograms (NIEMG) were calculated. Under the L-grip condition, MJD was shorter in the pronated position than in the supinated position (p &lt; 0.001); however, grip strength was lower in the pronated position. NIEMG of FDS was 90% in both positions, and those of FCR and FCU were low at 10%. However, that of PT was 3.6% in the supinated position and 40.9% in the pronated position, showing higher NIEMG in the pronated position (p &lt; 0.001). Medial support during grip tasks was higher in the pronated position probably because PT activity compensates for the decreased FDS activity.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641123000421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We measured the medial joint distance (MJD), activity of muscles involved in medial elbow-joint support, and grip strength, aiming to examine the supportfunction of muscles.

MJD was measured in supinated and pronated positions of the forearm of 10 participants under three conditions: at rest (R), under valgus load on the elbow joint (L), and under valgus load on the elbow joint during the grip task (L-grip). Under the L-grip condition, electromyography was performed on flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), pronator teres (PT), flexor carpi radialis (FCR), and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU); subsequently, normalized integrated electromyograms (NIEMG) were calculated. Under the L-grip condition, MJD was shorter in the pronated position than in the supinated position (p < 0.001); however, grip strength was lower in the pronated position. NIEMG of FDS was 90% in both positions, and those of FCR and FCU were low at 10%. However, that of PT was 3.6% in the supinated position and 40.9% in the pronated position, showing higher NIEMG in the pronated position (p < 0.001). Medial support during grip tasks was higher in the pronated position probably because PT activity compensates for the decreased FDS activity.

不同前臂姿势抓握任务中前臂内侧肌肉收缩对肘关节内侧支撑的影响
我们测量了内侧关节距离(MJD)、参与内侧肘关节支撑的肌肉活动和握力,旨在检查肌肉的支撑功能。在三种条件下,10名参与者在前臂旋后和旋前位置测量MJD:休息时(R)、肘关节外翻负荷下(L)和抓握任务中肘关节外翻负载下(L抓握)。在L型握力条件下,对指浅屈肌(FDS)、圆旋肌(PT)、桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)和尺侧腕屈肌(FCU)进行肌电图检查;随后计算归一化综合肌电图(NIEMG)。在L-握力条件下,旋前位的MJD比旋后位的短(p<0.001);然而,内旋姿势的握力较低。FDS的NIEMG在这两个职位上都是90%,FCR和FCU的NIEMG低至10%。然而,PT在仰卧位为3.6%,在旋前位为40.9%,显示旋前位的NIEMG更高(p<0.001)。握持任务中的内侧支撑在旋前位置更高,可能是因为PT活动补偿了FDS活动的减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques. As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信