Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Performance Characteristics in Those With and Without Hemorrhoids

Derek W. Ebner MD , David Rushlow MD , Joshua Mou MD , Kyle Porter MAS , Lila J. Finney Rutten MPH, PhD , Paul Limburg MD , Feyza Sancar PhD , Thomas F. Imperiale MD
{"title":"Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Performance Characteristics in Those With and Without Hemorrhoids","authors":"Derek W. Ebner MD ,&nbsp;David Rushlow MD ,&nbsp;Joshua Mou MD ,&nbsp;Kyle Porter MAS ,&nbsp;Lila J. Finney Rutten MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Paul Limburg MD ,&nbsp;Feyza Sancar PhD ,&nbsp;Thomas F. Imperiale MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the effect of hemorrhoids on noninvasive stool test performance for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of test characteristics for the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, on the basis of hemorrhoid status, recorded at the time of colonoscopy, among patients enrolled in the pivotal prospective study for mt-sDNA that was conducted from June 2011, to May 2013. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values) for FIT and mt-sDNA (performed &lt; 90 days before colonoscopy) were stratified by the presence of hemorrhoids and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Hemorrhoids were found in 51.7% (5163 of 9989) of the study cohort. Across all test characteristics, there were no statistically significant differences for FIT or mt-sDNA when stratified by hemorrhoid status. Analysis revealed mt-sDNA sensitivity of 44% and 41% for advanced precancerous lesions in nonhemorrhoidal and hemorrhoid patients, respectively (<em>P</em>=.41). The FIT sensitivity among the same lesion category was 24.9% in patients without hemorrhoids and 22.8% in those with hemorrhoids (<em>P</em>=.48). The mt-sDNA specificity was 86.4% in patients without hemorrhoids vs 87.7% in those with hemorrhoids (<em>P</em>=.67), although FIT specificity was 95.0% among patients without hemorrhoids vs 94.7% in those with hemorrhoids (<em>P</em>=.44).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presence of asymptomatic hemorrhoids did not adversely affect test performance in this large clinical study. These findings suggest that in the absence of overt gastrointestinal bleeding, FIT and mt-sDNA are options for CRC screening, irrespective of hemorrhoid status.</p></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01397747</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/73/86/main.PMC10371761.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of hemorrhoids on noninvasive stool test performance for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of test characteristics for the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and the multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, on the basis of hemorrhoid status, recorded at the time of colonoscopy, among patients enrolled in the pivotal prospective study for mt-sDNA that was conducted from June 2011, to May 2013. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values) for FIT and mt-sDNA (performed < 90 days before colonoscopy) were stratified by the presence of hemorrhoids and compared.

Results

Hemorrhoids were found in 51.7% (5163 of 9989) of the study cohort. Across all test characteristics, there were no statistically significant differences for FIT or mt-sDNA when stratified by hemorrhoid status. Analysis revealed mt-sDNA sensitivity of 44% and 41% for advanced precancerous lesions in nonhemorrhoidal and hemorrhoid patients, respectively (P=.41). The FIT sensitivity among the same lesion category was 24.9% in patients without hemorrhoids and 22.8% in those with hemorrhoids (P=.48). The mt-sDNA specificity was 86.4% in patients without hemorrhoids vs 87.7% in those with hemorrhoids (P=.67), although FIT specificity was 95.0% among patients without hemorrhoids vs 94.7% in those with hemorrhoids (P=.44).

Conclusion

The presence of asymptomatic hemorrhoids did not adversely affect test performance in this large clinical study. These findings suggest that in the absence of overt gastrointestinal bleeding, FIT and mt-sDNA are options for CRC screening, irrespective of hemorrhoid status.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01397747

有和没有痔疮的结直肠癌粪便筛查试验的表现特征
目的评价痔疮对大肠癌筛查无创大便检查效果的影响。患者和方法我们在2011年6月至2013年5月进行的mt sDNA关键前瞻性研究中,根据结肠镜检查时记录的痔疮状况,对粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)和多靶点粪便DNA(mt sDNA)试验的试验特征进行了回顾性队列研究。FIT和mt sDNA(结肠镜检查前<;90天进行)的测试特征(敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值)根据痔疮的存在进行分层并进行比较。结果研究队列中有51.7%(9989人中有5163人)发现痔疮。在所有测试特征中,按痔疮状态分层时,FIT或mt-sDNA没有统计学上的显著差异。分析显示,在非痔疮和痔疮患者中,mt-sDNA对晚期癌前病变的敏感性分别为44%和41%(P=.41)。在同一病变类别中,非痔疮患者和有痔疮患者的FIT敏感性分别为24.9%和22.8%(P=.48)。非痔疮患者的mt-sDNA特异性为86.4%,有痔疮患者为87.7%(P=.67),尽管非痔疮患者的FIT特异性为95.0%,而有痔疮患者的特异性为94.7%(P=.44)。这些发现表明,在没有明显胃肠道出血的情况下,无论痔疮状况如何,FIT和mt-sDNA都是CRC筛查的选择。试验注册clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01397747
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信