Longitudinal Assessment of Mobility and Self-care Among Critically Ill Older Adults. An Age-Friendly Health Systems Initiative Quality Improvement Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 NURSING
Carleigh M Rittel, Bryan A Borg, Anelis V Hanessian, Angela Kuhar, Mindy J Fain, Christian Bime
{"title":"Longitudinal Assessment of Mobility and Self-care Among Critically Ill Older Adults. An Age-Friendly Health Systems Initiative Quality Improvement Study.","authors":"Carleigh M Rittel, Bryan A Borg, Anelis V Hanessian, Angela Kuhar, Mindy J Fain, Christian Bime","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early mobility in the intensive care unit (ICU) is vital to maintaining an older adult patient's performance of activities of daily living, functional mobility, and overall quality of life. Prior studies have shown reduced length of inpatient stay and onset of delirium in patients with early mobilization. Despite these benefits, many ICU patients are often labeled as too sick to participate in therapy and frequently do not receive physical (PT) or occupational therapy (OT) consults until they are considered floor status. This delay in therapy can negatively affect a patient's capacity to participate in his/her self-care, add to the burden on caregivers, and limit disposition options.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our goals were to perform a longitudinal assessment of mobility and self-care among older patients through their medical ICU (MICU) stays and to quantify visits by therapy services to identify areas for improvement in achieving early intervention in this at-risk population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a retrospective quality improvement analysis of a cohort of admissions to the MICU at a large tertiary academic medical center between November 2018 and May 2019. Admission information, PT and OT consult information, Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility Score, and Modified Barthel Index scores were entered into a quality improvement registry. Inclusion criteria consisted of age older than 65 years and at least 2 distinct visits by PT and/or OT for evaluation. Patients without consults and patients with weekend-only MICU stays were not assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 302 MICU patients 65 years or older admitted during the study period. Forty-four percent (132) of these patients received PT/OT consults, and among these, 32% (42) had at least 2 visits to allow comparison of objective scores. Seventy-five percent of patients had improved Perme scores (median, 9.4%; interquartile range, 2.3%-15.6%), and 58% of patients had improved Modified Barthel Index scores (median, 3%; interquartile range, -2% to 13.5%). However, 17% of potential therapy days were missed because of inadequate staffing/time, and 14% were missed because of being sedated or unable to participate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort of patients older than 65 years, receipt of therapy in the MICU led to modest improvements in score-assessed mobility and self-care before transfer to floor. Staffing, time constraints, and patient sedation or encephalopathy appeared to interfere most with further potential benefits. In the next phase, we plan to implement strategies to increase PT/OT availability in the MICU and implement a protocol to increase identification and referral of candidates for whom early therapy can prevent loss of mobility and ability to perform self-care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46646,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early mobility in the intensive care unit (ICU) is vital to maintaining an older adult patient's performance of activities of daily living, functional mobility, and overall quality of life. Prior studies have shown reduced length of inpatient stay and onset of delirium in patients with early mobilization. Despite these benefits, many ICU patients are often labeled as too sick to participate in therapy and frequently do not receive physical (PT) or occupational therapy (OT) consults until they are considered floor status. This delay in therapy can negatively affect a patient's capacity to participate in his/her self-care, add to the burden on caregivers, and limit disposition options.

Objectives: Our goals were to perform a longitudinal assessment of mobility and self-care among older patients through their medical ICU (MICU) stays and to quantify visits by therapy services to identify areas for improvement in achieving early intervention in this at-risk population.

Method: This was a retrospective quality improvement analysis of a cohort of admissions to the MICU at a large tertiary academic medical center between November 2018 and May 2019. Admission information, PT and OT consult information, Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility Score, and Modified Barthel Index scores were entered into a quality improvement registry. Inclusion criteria consisted of age older than 65 years and at least 2 distinct visits by PT and/or OT for evaluation. Patients without consults and patients with weekend-only MICU stays were not assessed.

Results: There were 302 MICU patients 65 years or older admitted during the study period. Forty-four percent (132) of these patients received PT/OT consults, and among these, 32% (42) had at least 2 visits to allow comparison of objective scores. Seventy-five percent of patients had improved Perme scores (median, 9.4%; interquartile range, 2.3%-15.6%), and 58% of patients had improved Modified Barthel Index scores (median, 3%; interquartile range, -2% to 13.5%). However, 17% of potential therapy days were missed because of inadequate staffing/time, and 14% were missed because of being sedated or unable to participate.

Conclusions: In our cohort of patients older than 65 years, receipt of therapy in the MICU led to modest improvements in score-assessed mobility and self-care before transfer to floor. Staffing, time constraints, and patient sedation or encephalopathy appeared to interfere most with further potential benefits. In the next phase, we plan to implement strategies to increase PT/OT availability in the MICU and implement a protocol to increase identification and referral of candidates for whom early therapy can prevent loss of mobility and ability to perform self-care.

纵向评估重症老年人的行动能力和自理能力。老年友好医疗系统倡议质量改进研究》。
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)中的早期移动对于维持老年患者的日常生活活动能力、功能移动能力和整体生活质量至关重要。先前的研究表明,早期移动可以缩短患者的住院时间并减少谵妄的发生。尽管有这些益处,但许多重症监护病房的病人往往被认为病情严重,无法参与治疗,而且往往直到他们被认为处于地面状态时才接受物理(PT)或作业疗法(OT)咨询。这种治疗延误会对患者参与自我护理的能力产生负面影响,加重护理人员的负担,并限制处置方案:我们的目标是对老年患者在内科重症监护病房(MICU)住院期间的行动能力和自理能力进行纵向评估,并对治疗服务的访问进行量化,以确定在对这一高危人群进行早期干预方面需要改进的地方:这是一项回顾性质量改进分析,分析对象是 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 5 月期间入住一家大型三级学术医疗中心 MICU 的一组患者。入院信息、PT和OT咨询信息、Perme重症监护室移动能力评分和改良Barthel指数评分被录入质量改进登记册。纳入标准包括年龄大于 65 岁,至少接受过 2 次康复治疗师和/或康复治疗师的评估。未进行会诊的患者和仅在周末入住重症监护病房的患者不在评估之列:研究期间,MICU 共收治了 302 名 65 岁或以上的患者。其中 44% 的患者(132 人)接受了 PT/OT 咨询,其中 32% 的患者(42 人)至少接受了两次咨询,以便比较客观评分。75%的患者Perme评分有所改善(中位数为9.4%;四分位间范围为2.3%-15.6%),58%的患者改良Barthel指数评分有所改善(中位数为3%;四分位间范围为-2%-13.5%)。然而,17%的潜在治疗天数因人手/时间不足而错过,14%的潜在治疗天数因患者镇静或无法参与治疗而错过:结论:在我们的 65 岁以上患者队列中,在重症监护病房接受治疗后,患者在转入楼层前的活动能力和自理能力评分评估方面均有适度改善。人员配备、时间限制、患者镇静或脑病似乎对进一步的潜在益处干扰最大。在下一阶段,我们计划实施相关策略,以增加 MICU 的 PT/OT 可用性,并实施一项协议,以增加对候选患者的识别和转诊,对这些患者进行早期治疗可防止其丧失行动能力和自我护理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing™ is to provide nurses with accurate, current, and relevant information and services to excel in critical care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信