Beneficial Effects of Early Intervention Telemedicine-based Follow-Up in Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Benedikt Fridriksson, Marianne Berndtson, Henrik Hamnered, Erik Faeder, Ding Zou, Jan Hedner, Ludger Grote
{"title":"Beneficial Effects of Early Intervention Telemedicine-based Follow-Up in Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.","authors":"Benedikt Fridriksson,&nbsp;Marianne Berndtson,&nbsp;Henrik Hamnered,&nbsp;Erik Faeder,&nbsp;Ding Zou,&nbsp;Jan Hedner,&nbsp;Ludger Grote","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202208-723OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Positive airway pressure (PAP) is standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Telemedicine has been introduced for improved PAP follow-up. <b>Objectives:</b> Our study aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of and patient satisfaction with PAP follow-up with an early intervention telemedical protocol. <b>Methods:</b> A randomized controlled trial was conducted at four sleep clinics of the same county. Treatment-naive patients with obstructive sleep apnea were randomized to standard PAP follow-up (203 patients, fixed follow-up procedures) or early intervention telemedical follow-up (AirView, ResMed; 206 patients, continuous follow-up) for 3 months. Evaluated variables included PAP adherence at 3 months, patient-reported outcome measures (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, 36-item Short Form Health Survey, Insomnia Severity Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and staff time. Group differences were analyzed with linear mixed regression models adjusted for age, body mass index, apnea-hypopnea index, and study center. <b>Results:</b> The study groups were comparable at baseline (<i>N</i> = 409; mean age, 59 ± 12 yr; body mass index, 31.9 ± 6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, apnea-hypopnea index, 41.5 ± 21 events/h). PAP adherence was higher in the proactive telemedicine group than in the control group (4.3 ± 2.4 and 4.1 ± 2.6 h/night; <i>P</i> = 0.01, respectively), and mean mask pressure at follow-up was significantly lower in the telemedicine group than in the control group (8.7 ± 2.1 cm H<sub>2</sub>O vs. 9.2 ± 2.5 cm H<sub>2</sub>O; <i>P</i> = 0.028). In <i>post hoc</i> analysis, the difference in PAP adherence between groups was most pronounced in patients with depression (4.8 ± 2.6 h/night vs. 2.7 ± 2.3 h/night; <i>P</i> = 0.03). Relevant mask leakage (>24 L/min) was lower in the telemedicine group (5.4% vs. 12.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.024). Improvement of patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction was equivalent between groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Proactive telemedical management of the initial follow-up of PAP treatment compared favorably with conventional follow-up in terms of adherence, pressure level, and mask leakage. Patients with depression may particularly benefit from telemedical follow-up. Specific clinical routines are required to establish this practice in sleep clinics. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03446560).</p>","PeriodicalId":8018,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1499-1507"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202208-723OC","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Telemedicine has been introduced for improved PAP follow-up. Objectives: Our study aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of and patient satisfaction with PAP follow-up with an early intervention telemedical protocol. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at four sleep clinics of the same county. Treatment-naive patients with obstructive sleep apnea were randomized to standard PAP follow-up (203 patients, fixed follow-up procedures) or early intervention telemedical follow-up (AirView, ResMed; 206 patients, continuous follow-up) for 3 months. Evaluated variables included PAP adherence at 3 months, patient-reported outcome measures (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, 36-item Short Form Health Survey, Insomnia Severity Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and staff time. Group differences were analyzed with linear mixed regression models adjusted for age, body mass index, apnea-hypopnea index, and study center. Results: The study groups were comparable at baseline (N = 409; mean age, 59 ± 12 yr; body mass index, 31.9 ± 6 kg/m2, apnea-hypopnea index, 41.5 ± 21 events/h). PAP adherence was higher in the proactive telemedicine group than in the control group (4.3 ± 2.4 and 4.1 ± 2.6 h/night; P = 0.01, respectively), and mean mask pressure at follow-up was significantly lower in the telemedicine group than in the control group (8.7 ± 2.1 cm H2O vs. 9.2 ± 2.5 cm H2O; P = 0.028). In post hoc analysis, the difference in PAP adherence between groups was most pronounced in patients with depression (4.8 ± 2.6 h/night vs. 2.7 ± 2.3 h/night; P = 0.03). Relevant mask leakage (>24 L/min) was lower in the telemedicine group (5.4% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.024). Improvement of patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction was equivalent between groups. Conclusions: Proactive telemedical management of the initial follow-up of PAP treatment compared favorably with conventional follow-up in terms of adherence, pressure level, and mask leakage. Patients with depression may particularly benefit from telemedical follow-up. Specific clinical routines are required to establish this practice in sleep clinics. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03446560).

基于远程医疗的睡眠呼吸暂停早期干预随访的有益效果:一项随机对照多中心试验。
理由:气道正压通气(PAP)是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的标准治疗方法。远程医疗已被引入以改善PAP的随访。目的:我们的研究目的是评估早期介入远程医疗方案的PAP随访的临床实用性和患者满意度。方法:在同一县的四家睡眠诊所进行随机对照试验。未接受治疗的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者被随机分为标准PAP随访(203名患者,固定随访程序)或早期干预远程医疗随访(AirView,ResMed;206名患者,持续随访),为期3天 月。评估变量包括3岁时的PAP依从性 月,患者报告的结果测量(Epworth嗜睡量表、36项简式健康调查、失眠严重程度指数、医院焦虑和抑郁量表)和工作人员时间。采用校正了年龄、体重指数、呼吸暂停低通气指数和研究中心的线性混合回归模型分析组间差异。结果:研究组在基线时具有可比性(N = 409;平均年龄,59岁 ± 12 yr;体重指数,31.9 ± 6. kg/m2,呼吸暂停低通气指数,41.5 ± 21个事件/h)。主动远程医疗组的PAP依从性高于对照组(4.3 ± 2.4和4.1 ± 2.6 h/夜;P = 分别为0.01),远程医疗组随访时的平均面罩压力显著低于对照组(8.7 ± 2.1 cm H2O与9.2 ± 2.5 cm H2O;P = 0.028)。在事后分析中,两组之间PAP依从性的差异在抑郁症患者中最为显著(4.8 ± 2.6 小时/夜vs.2.7 ± 2.3 h/夜;P = 0.03)。相关口罩泄漏(>24 L/min)较低(5.4%vs.12.1%,P = 0.024)。患者报告的结果测量和患者满意度的改善在各组之间是相等的。结论:在依从性、压力水平和面罩渗漏方面,PAP治疗初始随访的主动远程医疗管理优于常规随访。抑郁症患者可能特别受益于远程医疗随访。在睡眠诊所建立这种做法需要特定的临床常规。在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册的临床试验(NCT03446560)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Annals of the American Thoracic Society Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Annals of the American Thoracic Society (AnnalsATS) is the official international online journal of the American Thoracic Society. Formerly known as PATS, it provides comprehensive and authoritative coverage of a wide range of topics in adult and pediatric pulmonary medicine, respiratory sleep medicine, and adult medical critical care. As a leading journal in its field, AnnalsATS offers up-to-date and reliable information that is directly applicable to clinical practice. It serves as a valuable resource for clinical specialists, supporting their formative and continuing education. Additionally, the journal is committed to promoting public health by publishing research and articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信